Working in the Eye of the Pandemic: Local COVID-19 Infections and Daily Employee Engagement.

COVID-19 aging diary study leadership work engagement

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 15 01 2021
accepted: 02 06 2021
entrez: 19 7 2021
pubmed: 20 7 2021
medline: 20 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically changed many aspects of our society and work life. This study assesses how daily variations in employees' work engagement are affected by daily variations in infection rates in employees' communities. Applying the conceptual framework of event system theory, we argue that surging COVID-19 cases have an impact on employee engagement, depending on the individual sensemaking processes of the pandemic. We assume that employee age and received leader support are key context factors for these sensemaking processes and that particularly older employees and employees who receive little leader consideration react with lower work engagement levels toward rising local COVID-19 infections in their proximity. We find support for most of our proposed relationships in an 8-day diary study of German employees, which we integrate with official COVID-19 case statistics on the county level. We discuss the implications of these results for the literature on extreme events and individual workplace behavior. Furthermore, these findings have important implications for companies and executives who are confronted with local COVID-19 outbreaks or other extreme societal events.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34276476
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654126
pmc: PMC8282194
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

654126

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Reinwald, Zimmermann and Kunze.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Appl Psychol. 2021 Mar;106(3):317-329
pubmed: 33871269
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Nov;101(11):1620-1634
pubmed: 27504658
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Feb;89(1):36-51
pubmed: 14769119
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Dec;82(6):858-72
pubmed: 9638087
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1990;47:65-97
pubmed: 11538273
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Mar;106(3):345-363
pubmed: 32309963
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jul;73(1):5-18
pubmed: 9216076
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2020 Sep-Oct;32(6-7):363-365
pubmed: 32643963
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):e64
pubmed: 32220657
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Feb;106(2):185-198
pubmed: 33600192
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;66(6):525-527
pubmed: 32349580
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):121-38
pubmed: 17563168
Biosci Trends. 2008 Feb;2(1):2
pubmed: 20103890
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Nov;96(6):1246-57
pubmed: 21766997
J Theor Biol. 2008 Sep 21;254(2):499-507
pubmed: 18606170
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e24-e29
pubmed: 32470120
Psychol Methods. 2017 Mar;22(1):114-140
pubmed: 27149401
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Sep;97(5):913-30
pubmed: 22708919
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Nov;105(11):1218-1233
pubmed: 33030924

Auteurs

Max Reinwald (M)

Institute for Leadership and Organization, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Sophia Zimmermann (S)

Chair for Organisational Studies, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Florian Kunze (F)

Chair for Organisational Studies, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Classifications MeSH