A Dual Path Model of Work-Related Well-Being in Healthcare and Social Work Settings: The Interweaving Between Trait Emotional Intelligence, End-User Job Demands, Coworkers Related Job Resources, Burnout, and Work Engagement.
burnout
healthcare
path model
social work
trait emotional intelligence
well-being
work engagement
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
28
01
2021
accepted:
24
05
2021
entrez:
19
7
2021
pubmed:
20
7
2021
medline:
20
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Framing the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, the present study deepened how trait emotional intelligence (TEI, i.e., perception about one's own emotional realm) contributes to the work-related well-being of healthcare professionals. A total of 302 healthcare professionals were involved in the study and completed an anonymous self-report questionnaire. The results of the structural equation modeling revealed that TEI was directly and indirectly-mediated by end-user job demands-negatively associated with burnout, and directly and indirectly-mediated by coworkers related job resources- associated with work engagement. According to the health impairment and motivational processes of JD-R, the present study highlights that TEI could targets burnout and work engagement through different paths. The first path revealed that TEI would reduce burnout protecting by the insurgence harmful relationships with service end-users and the second showed that TEI would support work engagement sustaining the development of positive relationship with coworkers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34276483
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660035
pmc: PMC8280767
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
660035Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Tesi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Mar;24(2):E101-11
pubmed: 26032875
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422
pubmed: 11148311
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Jun;41:59-61
pubmed: 29853216
J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Jul;16(3):361-89
pubmed: 21728441
J Occup Health Psychol. 2010 Jul;15(3):209-222
pubmed: 20604629
J Pers Assess. 2010 Sep;92(5):449-57
pubmed: 20706931
Psychol Rep. 2004 Oct;95(2):386-90
pubmed: 15587197
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903
pubmed: 14516251
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2743
pubmed: 31920801
Glob J Health Sci. 2013 May 02;5(4):142-50
pubmed: 23777730
J Appl Psychol. 1996 Apr;81(2):123-33
pubmed: 8603909
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Oct;45(10):1460-9
pubmed: 18221742
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285
pubmed: 27732008
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Aug;65(4):599-610
pubmed: 9256561
Burn Res. 2015 Sep;2(2-3):71-79
pubmed: 26877971
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 17;7:1182
pubmed: 27582713
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 06;8:62
pubmed: 32211366