Forecasting of the composite dose for organs at risk and solid targets with random movements during different image-guided scenarios of the photon radiation therapy. Solution for the Varian therapeutic line.
prostate radiotherapy
robust evaluation
robust plan analysis
robustness
Journal
Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
ISSN: 1507-1367
Titre abrégé: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 100885761
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
04
10
2020
accepted:
23
02
2021
entrez:
19
7
2021
pubmed:
20
7
2021
medline:
20
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aims to develop a useful tool for robust plan analysis which includes the effects of soft tissue deformations on simulated dose distributions. The solution was benchmarked in the light of the commercial method implemented in Eclipse Study was carried out on data of one patient with prostate-restricted cancer. The workflow of the procedure developed focused on three executive elements: in-house script to create a set of artificial CT images and for movement simulation of the CT V; the Velocity The DVHs from our methods are more informative than the DVH from commercially implemented tools. For the first scenario, the highest impact on dose uncertainty has boundary positions of the CT V to the CT V-PTV margin. Using the second scenario, it is the relation of the CT V position to the whole body that has the highest effect on dose uncertainty. Our method enables a more accurate analysis of the treatment plan robustness than the method currently implemented in Eclipse
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aims to develop a useful tool for robust plan analysis which includes the effects of soft tissue deformations on simulated dose distributions. The solution was benchmarked in the light of the commercial method implemented in Eclipse
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Study was carried out on data of one patient with prostate-restricted cancer. The workflow of the procedure developed focused on three executive elements: in-house script to create a set of artificial CT images and for movement simulation of the CT V; the Velocity
RESULTS
RESULTS
The DVHs from our methods are more informative than the DVH from commercially implemented tools. For the first scenario, the highest impact on dose uncertainty has boundary positions of the CT V to the CT V-PTV margin. Using the second scenario, it is the relation of the CT V position to the whole body that has the highest effect on dose uncertainty.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our method enables a more accurate analysis of the treatment plan robustness than the method currently implemented in Eclipse
Identifiants
pubmed: 34277106
doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0051
pii: rpor-26-3-489
pmc: PMC8281900
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
489-494Informations de copyright
© 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jun;119(3):371-80
pubmed: 27162159
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jan;14(1):41-51
pubmed: 14752732
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Dec;13(6):583-91
pubmed: 24000985
Radiother Oncol. 2001 Jul;60(1):95-105
pubmed: 11410310
Phys Med Biol. 2002 Jul 7;47(13):2203-20
pubmed: 12164582
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Jul-Aug;25(4):684-691
pubmed: 32581656
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 08;17(3):25-40
pubmed: 27167256
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar - Apr;8(2):e41-e47
pubmed: 29122556
Med Phys. 2010 Nov;37(11):5850-7
pubmed: 21158297
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 1;67(3):670-7
pubmed: 17197123
Br J Radiol. 2016 Nov;89(1067):20160312
pubmed: 27377353
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Dec;153:26-33
pubmed: 32987045
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jul 1;47(4):1121-35
pubmed: 10863086
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Dec;141:267-274
pubmed: 31492443
Phys Med Biol. 1998 Jan;43(1):91-104
pubmed: 9483625
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul - Aug;9(4):200-207
pubmed: 30562614
Phys Med. 2018 Feb;46:59-66
pubmed: 29519410
Phys Med. 2019 Jan;57:183-190
pubmed: 30738524