Additively Manufactured Zirconia for Dental Applications.
Rietveld refinement
Weibull analysis
X-ray diffraction (XRD)
additive manufacturing
alumina-toughened zirconia
microstructural analysis
subtractive manufacturing
zirconia
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2021
01 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
11
06
2021
revised:
27
06
2021
accepted:
28
06
2021
entrez:
19
7
2021
pubmed:
20
7
2021
medline:
20
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to assess the crystallography, microstructure and flexural strength of zirconia-based ceramics made by stereolithography (SLA). Two additively manufactured 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (3Y-TZP: LithaCon 3Y 230, Lithoz; 3D Mix zirconia, 3DCeram Sinto) and one alumina-toughened zirconia (ATZ: 3D Mix ATZ, 3DCeram Sinto) were compared to subtractively manufactured 3Y-TZP (control: LAVA Plus, 3M Oral Care). Crystallographic analysis was conducted by X-ray diffraction. Top surfaces and cross-sections of the subsurface microstructure were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Biaxial flexural strength was statistically compared using Weibull analysis. The additively and subtractively manufactured zirconia grades revealed a similar phase composition. The residual porosity of the SLA 3Y-TZPs and ATZ was comparable to that of subtractively manufactured 3Y-TZP. Weibull analysis revealed that the additively manufactured LithaCon 3Y 230 (Lithoz) had a significantly lower biaxial flexural strength than 3D Mix ATZ (3D Ceram Sinto). The biaxial flexural strength of the subtractively manufactured LAVA Plus (3M Oral Care) was in between those of the additively manufactured 3Y-TZPs, with the additively manufactured ATZ significantly outperforming the subtractively manufactured 3Y-TZP. Additively manufactured 3Y-TZP showed comparable crystallography, microstructure and flexural strength as the subtractively manufactured zirconia, thus potentially being a good option for dental implants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34279264
pii: ma14133694
doi: 10.3390/ma14133694
pmc: PMC8269801
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) JP19K10241
Organisme : the Kazuchika Ohkura Memorial Foundation
ID : N.A.
Références
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Nov;75:521-528
pubmed: 28846981
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Feb;114:104180
pubmed: 33158788
Dent Mater. 2017 Jan;33(1):99-109
pubmed: 27884403
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Mar;115:104268
pubmed: 33338964
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Mar;32(2):182-192
pubmed: 31701629
Dent Mater J. 2011;30(3):286-92
pubmed: 21597215
Addit Manuf. 2020 Dec;36:
pubmed: 32793425
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jan 25;2021:8875023
pubmed: 33575352
Int J Comput Dent. 2020;23(1):27-37
pubmed: 32207459
Dent Mater. 2017 May;33(5):477-485
pubmed: 28318544
Dent Mater. 2004 Jan;20(1):51-62
pubmed: 14698774
Dent Mater. 2018 Feb;34(2):171-182
pubmed: 29122237
Dent Mater. 2017 Apr;33(4):e147-e154
pubmed: 28077209
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Apr;125(4):685-690
pubmed: 32434662
Dent Mater. 2020 Jul;36(7):959-972
pubmed: 32493658
Dent Mater. 2020 Apr;36(4):e117-e125
pubmed: 32035668
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 24;13(3):
pubmed: 31991565
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:157360
pubmed: 25945324
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Dec;21(12):1345-52
pubmed: 20626420
Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Apr 26;4(1):13
pubmed: 29696470
Int J Prosthodont. 2021 Feb 19;:
pubmed: 33616569
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Jan;113:104115
pubmed: 33189013
Materials (Basel). 2015 Mar 05;8(3):932-958
pubmed: 28787980