Clinimetric Properties of Self-reported Disability Scales for Whiplash: A Systematic Review for the Whiplash Core Outcome Set (CATWAD).
Journal
The Clinical journal of pain
ISSN: 1536-5409
Titre abrégé: Clin J Pain
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8507389
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2021
01 10 2021
Historique:
received:
15
11
2020
accepted:
02
07
2021
pubmed:
21
7
2021
medline:
25
2
2023
entrez:
20
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A core outcomes set (COS) for whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) has been proposed to improve consistency of outcome reporting in clinical trials. Patient-reported disability was one outcome of interest within this COS. The aim of this review was to identify the most suitable tools for measuring self-reported disability in WAD based on clinimetric performance. Database searches took place in 2 stages. The first identified outcome measures used to assess self-reported disability in WAD, and the second identified studies assessing the clinimetric properties of these outcome measures in WAD. Data on the study, population and outcome measure characteristics were extracted, along with clinimetric data. Quality and clinimetric performance were assessed in accordance with the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). Of 19,663 records identified in stage 1 searches, 32 were retained following stage 2 searches and screening. Both the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index performed well in reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.84 to 0.98), construct validity (74% to 82% of hypotheses accepted), and responsiveness (majority of correlations in accordance with hypotheses). Both received Category B recommendations due to a lack of evidence for content validity. This review identified the Neck Disability Index and Whiplash Disability Questionnaire as the most appropriate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing self-reported disability in WAD based on moderate to high-quality evidence for sufficient reliability, construct validity and responsiveness. However, the content validity of these PROMs has yet to be established in WAD, and until this is undertaken, it is not possible to recommend 1 PROM over the other for inclusion in the WAD COS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34282060
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000968
pii: 00002508-202110000-00006
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
766-787Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Weebe J, Ali S, Sakonidou S, et al. Inconsistent outcome reporting in large neonatal trials: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019;105:69–75.
Hirsch M, Duffy J, Kusznir J, et al. Variation in outcome reporting in endometriosis trials: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:452–464.
Duffy J, Hirsch M, Kawsar A, et al. Outcome reporting across randomised controlled trials evaluating therapeutic interventions for pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2017;124:1829–1839.
Williamson P, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132.
Boers M, Idzerda L, Kirwan JR, et al. Toward a generalized framework of core measurement areas in clinical trials: a position paper for OMERACT 11. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:978–985.
Tugwell P, Boers M, Brooks P, et al. OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology. Trials. 2007;8:38.
Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, et al. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trils: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2003;106:337–345.
Chiarotto A, Deyo RA, Terwee CB, et al. Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1127–1142.
Emery CA, Whittaker JL, Mahmoudian A, et al. Establishing outcome measures in early knee osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15:438–448.
Kirkham J, Davis K, Altman DG, et al. Core Outcome Set—STAndards for Development: the COS-STAD recommendations. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002447.
Chen K, Andersen T, Carroll L, et al. Recommendations for core outcome domain set for whiplash-associated disorders (CATWAD). Clin J Pain. 2019;35:727–736.
Ritchie C, Hendrikz J, Kenardy J, et al. Derivation of a clinical prediction rule to identify both chronic moderate/severe disability and full recovery following whiplash injury. Pain. 2013;154:2198–2206.
Griffin A, Moloney N, Leaver AL, et al. Defining recovery in chronic whiplash: a qualitative study. Clin J Pain. 2019;36:505–515.
Walton D, MacDermid J, Taylor T. ICON. What does ‘recovery’ mean to people with neck pain? Results of a descriptive thematic analysis. Open Orthop J. 2013;7:420–427.
Maujean A, Sterling J, Sterling M. What information do patients need following a whiplash injury? The perspectives of patients and physiotherapists. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:1135–1141.
Kamper SJ, Rebbeck TJ, Maher CG, et al. Course and prognostic factors of whiplash: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2008;138:617–629.
Sterling M, Hendrikz J, Kenardy J. Compensation claim lodgement and health outcome developmental trajectories following whiplash injury: a prospective study. Pain. 2010;150:22–28.
Jull G, Kenardy J, Hendrikz J, et al. Management of acute whiplash: a randomized controlled trial of multidisciplinary stratified treatments. Pain. 2013;154:1798–1806.
Pinfold M, Niere KR, O’Leary EF, et al. Validity and internal consistency of a whiplash-specific disability measure. Spine. 2004;29:263–268.
Rebbeck TJ, Refshauge KM, Maher CG, et al. Evaluation of the core outcome measure in whiplash. Spine. 2007;32:696–702.
Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:409–415.
Bolton JE, Humphreys BK. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure, II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25:141–148.
Mokkink LB, de Vet HC, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient‐reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1171–1179.
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1147–1157.
Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1159–1170.
Allan C, Campbell W, Guptill C, et al. A conceptual model for interprofessional eduction: the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). J Interprof Care. 2006;20:235–245.
Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on whiplash-associated disorders: redefining ‘Whiplash’ and its management. Spine. 1995;20:8.
Chiarotto A, Maxwell LJ, Terwee CB, et al. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: which has better measurement properties for measuring physical functioning in nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2016;96:1620–1637.
De Vet H, Terwee C, Mokkink L, et al. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COMSIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–657.
GRADE. GRADE Handbook—Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach; 2013.
Ware JE, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:903–912.
Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the pain disability index. Percept Mot Skills. 1984;59:974.
Takasaki H, Johnson V, Treleaven J, et al. The Neck Pain Driving Index (NPDI) for chronic whiplash-associated disorders: development, reliability, and validity assessment. Spine J. 2012;12:912–920.
BenDebba M, Heller J, Ducker T, et al. Cervical spine outcomes questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties. Spine. 2002;27:2116–2123.
Angst F, Verra M, Lehmann S, et al. Responsiveness of the cervical Northern American Spine Society questionnaire (NASS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) in chronic whiplash. Clinic Rehabil. 2011;26:142–15151.
Barriga-Martin A, Holgado-Moreno E, Avila-Martin G, et al. Spanish version of the whiplash disability questionnaire in adults with acute whiplash-associated disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018;42:276–283.
Benneker LM, Roenn C, Aghayev E, et al. Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire. J Spine. 2014;3.
Bjorklund M, Hamberg J, Heiden M, et al. The ProFitMap-neck - reliability and validity of a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1096–1107.
Chiarotto A, Falla D, Polli A, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire in patients with neck pain disorders. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48:204–216.
de Vries GE, Jorritsma W, Dijkstra PU, et al. The construct validity of the Short Form-36 Health Survey for patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38:137–143.
Fejer R, Hartvigsen J. Neck pain and disability due to neck pain: what is the relation? Eur Spine J. 2008;17:80–88.
Hoving JL, O’Leary EF, Niere KR, et al. Validity of the Neck Disability Index, Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability assocaited with whiplash associated disorders. Pain. 2003;102:273–281.
Jorritsma W, de Vries G, Geertzen J, et al. Neck Pain and Disability Scale and the Neck Disability Index: reproducibility of the Dutch language versions. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1695–1701.
Jorritsma W, Dijkstra PU, de Vries GE, et al. Detecting relevant changes and responsiveness of Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:2550–2557.
Jorritsma W, de Vries GE, Dijkstra PU, et al. Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index: validity of Dutch language versions. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:93–100.
Lankester BJA, Garneti N, Bannister GC. The classification of outcome following whiplash injury—a comparison of methods. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:605–609.
McCaskey M, Ettlin T, Schuster C. German version of the whiplash disability questionnaire: reproducibility and responsiveness. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:36.
Nieto R, Miro J, Huguet A. Disability in subacute whiplash patients—usefulness of the Neck Disability Index. Spine. 2008;33:E630–E635.
Ortega JAA, Martinez ADD, Ruiz RA. Validation of the Spanish Version of the Neck Disability Index. Spine. 2010;35:E114–E118.
Pink J, Petrou S, Williamson E, et al. Properties of patient-reported outcome measures in individuals following acute whiplash injury. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:38.
Schmitt MA, de Wijer A, van Genderen FR, et al. The neck bournemouth questionnaire cross-cultural adaptation into dutch and evaluation of its psychometric properties in a population with subacute and chronic whiplash associated disorders. Spine. 2009;34:2551–2561.
Schuster C, McCaskey M, Ettlin T. German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the whiplash disability questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:45.
Stenneberg MS, Schmitt MA, van Trijffel E, et al. Validation of a new questionnaire to assess the impact of whiplash associated disorders: the Whiplash Activity and Participation List (WAL). Man Ther. 2015;20:84–89.
Stewart M, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, et al. Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash. Spine. 2007;32:580–585.
Stupar M, Côté P, Beaton DE, et al. A test-retest reliability study of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire in patients with acute whiplash-associated disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38:629–636.
Stupar M, Cote P, Beaton DE, et al. Structural and construct validity of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire in adults with acute whiplash-associated disorders. Spine J. 2015;15:2369–2377.
Swanenburg J, Humphreys K, Langenfeld A, et al. Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G). Man Ther. 2014;19:52–58.
Trippolini MA, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB, et al. Measurement properties of the spinal function sort in patients with sub-acute whiplash-associated disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:527–536.
van der Meer S, Reneman MF, Verhoeven J, et al. Relationship between self-reported disability and functional capacity in patients with Whiplash Associated Disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:419–424.
Vernon H. Correlations among ratings of pain, disability and impairment in chronic whiplash-assoiated disorder. Pain Res Manage. 1997;4:207–213.
Vernon H, Guerriero R, Soave D, et al. The relationship between self-reated disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, and nonorganic signs in patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorder. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011;34:506–513.
Willis C, Niere KR, Hoving JL, et al. Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire. Pain. 2004;110:681–688.
Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, et al. The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271–273.
De Vet H, Terwee C, Mokkink L, et al. Chapter IV: Field-testing: Item Reduction and Data Structure. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (Practical Guides to Biostatistics and Epidemiology). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2011:65–95.
Ailliet L, Knol D, Rubinstein SM, et al. Definition of the construct to be measured is a prerequisite for the assessment of validity. The Neck Disability Index as an example. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:775–782.
Hains F, Waalen J, Mior S. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:75–80.
Wodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti JF, et al. Translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:376–382.
Macdermid J, Walton D, Avery S, et al. Measurement properties of the Neck Disability Index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:400–417.
Cleland J, Fritz J, Whitman J, et al. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2006;31:598–602.
De Vet H, Terwee C, Mokkink L, et al. Chapter VII: Responsiveness. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (Practical Guides to Biostatistics and Epidemiology). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2011 :202–226.
Kamper S, Ostelo R, Knol D, et al. Global perceived effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:760–766.