Artificial Intelligence Compared to Radiologists for the Initial Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Studies.

PRISMA-DTA QUADAS-2 artificial intelligence computer-aided diagnosis deep learning machine learning magnetic resonance imaging prostate cancer systematic review

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 28 05 2021
revised: 24 06 2021
accepted: 30 06 2021
entrez: 20 7 2021
pubmed: 21 7 2021
medline: 21 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), using artificial intelligence (AI), may reduce missed cancers and unnecessary biopsies, increase inter-observer agreement between radiologists, and alleviate pressures caused by rising case incidence and a shortage of specialist radiologists to read prostate mpMRI. However, well-designed evaluation studies are required to prove efficacy above current clinical practice. A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and arXiv electronic databases was conducted for studies that compared CAD for prostate cancer detection or classification on MRI against radiologist interpretation and a histopathological reference standard, in treatment-naïve men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. Twenty-seven studies were included in the final analysis. Due to substantial heterogeneities in the included studies, a narrative synthesis is presented. Several studies reported superior diagnostic accuracy for CAD over radiologist interpretation on small, internal patient datasets, though this was not observed in the few studies that performed evaluation using external patient data. Our review found insufficient evidence to suggest the clinical deployment of artificial intelligence algorithms at present. Further work is needed to develop and enforce methodological standards, promote access to large diverse datasets, and conduct prospective evaluations before clinical adoption can be considered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34282762
pii: cancers13133318
doi: 10.3390/cancers13133318
pmc: PMC8268820
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Références

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jun;44(6):2030-2039
pubmed: 30460529
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6867-6876
pubmed: 32591889
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
Eur Radiol. 2017 Sep;27(9):3600-3608
pubmed: 28289941
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36
pubmed: 22007046
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jun;192(6):1682-9
pubmed: 19457835
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4082-4090
pubmed: 28374077
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Apr;10(4):808-823
pubmed: 32355645
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Nov;38(11):2496-2506
pubmed: 30835218
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 May;33(5):1083-92
pubmed: 24770913
BJU Int. 2019 Aug;124(2):209-220
pubmed: 30929292
J Urol. 2020 Apr;203(4):706-712
pubmed: 31642740
Eur Radiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):4407-4417
pubmed: 29651763
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 06;12(8):
pubmed: 32781640
Radiology. 2018 May;287(2):525-533
pubmed: 29361244
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Dec;100(12):801-811
pubmed: 31350218
Oncotarget. 2018 Sep 18;9(73):33804-33817
pubmed: 30333911
Radiology. 2018 Oct;289(1):128-137
pubmed: 30063191
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):575-582
pubmed: 28373135
Radiology. 2020 Mar;294(3):487-489
pubmed: 31891322
Eur Radiol Exp. 2019 Aug 7;3(1):35
pubmed: 31392526
Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3187-99
pubmed: 26060063
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jul;5(4):592-599
pubmed: 29226826
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4754-4764
pubmed: 31187216
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:789561
pubmed: 25525604
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351
pubmed: 30898406
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 17;10:631831
pubmed: 33680954
Eur Radiol. 2015 Feb;25(2):523-32
pubmed: 25226842
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jul 02;12(7):
pubmed: 32630787
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):20-29
pubmed: 33051065
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0185995
pubmed: 29023572
J Urol. 2020 Dec;204(6):1141-1149
pubmed: 32716687
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262
pubmed: 33172724
Radiology. 2019 Dec;293(3):607-617
pubmed: 31592731
Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):761-9
pubmed: 24592959
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4200-4208
pubmed: 28386721
Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):521-30
pubmed: 23204542
Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):800-809
pubmed: 29309734
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Oct;215(4):903-912
pubmed: 32755355
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Sep;13(9):541-8
pubmed: 27530265
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Mar;210(3):549-556
pubmed: 29220213
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jan;31(1):302-313
pubmed: 32767102
BMC Urol. 2015 Sep 04;15:91
pubmed: 26334874
Clin Imaging. 2020 Mar;60(1):123-130
pubmed: 31874336
Res Rep Urol. 2018 Nov 22;10:233-235
pubmed: 30538970
BMJ. 2020 Aug 14;370:m2632
pubmed: 32816740
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jun;30(6):3383-3392
pubmed: 32052171

Auteurs

Tom Syer (T)

Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, Bloomsbury Campus, University College London, London WC1E 6DH, UK.

Pritesh Mehta (P)

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Bloomsbury Campus, University College London, London WC1E 6DH, UK.

Michela Antonelli (M)

School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Campus, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.

Sue Mallett (S)

Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, Bloomsbury Campus, University College London, London WC1E 6DH, UK.

David Atkinson (D)

Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, Bloomsbury Campus, University College London, London WC1E 6DH, UK.

Sébastien Ourselin (S)

School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Campus, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.

Shonit Punwani (S)

Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, Bloomsbury Campus, University College London, London WC1E 6DH, UK.

Classifications MeSH