Using human centered design to identify opportunities for reducing inequities in perinatal care.


Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 31 12 2020
accepted: 31 05 2021
entrez: 21 7 2021
pubmed: 22 7 2021
medline: 23 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Extreme disparities in access, experience, and outcomes highlight the need to transform how pregnancy care is designed and delivered in the United States, especially for low-income individuals and people of color. We used human-centered design (HCD) to understand the challenges facing Medicaid-insured pregnant people and design interventions to address these challenges. The HCD method has three phases: Inspiration, Ideation, and Implementation. This study focused on the first and second. In the Inspiration phase we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of stakeholders who had either received or participated in the care of Medicaid-insured pregnant people within our community, with a specific emphasis on representation from marginalized communities. Using a general inductive approach to thematic analysis, we identified themes, which were then framed into design opportunities. In the Ideation phase, we conducted structured brainstorming sessions to generate potential prototypes of solutions, which were tested and iterated upon through a series of community events and engagement with a diverse community advisory group. We engaged a total of 171 stakeholders across both phases of the HCD methodology. In the Inspiration phase, interviews with 23 community members and an eight-person focus group revealed seven insights centered around two main themes: (1) racism and discrimination create major barriers to access, experience, and the ability to deliver high-value pregnancy care; (2) pregnancy care is overmedicalized and does not treat the pregnant person as an equal and informed partner. In the Ideation phase, 162 ideas were produced and translated into eight solution prototypes. Community scoring and feedback events with 140 stakeholders led to the progressive refinement and selection of three final prototypes: (1) implementing telemedicine (video visits) within the safety-net system, (2) integrating community-based peer support workers into healthcare teams, and (3) delivering co-located pregnancy-related care and services into high-need neighborhoods as a one-stop shop. Using HCD methodology and a collaborative community-health system approach, we identified gaps, opportunities, and solutions to address perinatal care inequities within our urban community. Given the urgent need for implementable and effective solutions, the design process was particularly well-suited because it focuses on understanding and centering the needs and values of stakeholders, is multi-disciplinary through all phases, and results in prototyping and iteration of real-world solutions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Extreme disparities in access, experience, and outcomes highlight the need to transform how pregnancy care is designed and delivered in the United States, especially for low-income individuals and people of color.
METHODS METHODS
We used human-centered design (HCD) to understand the challenges facing Medicaid-insured pregnant people and design interventions to address these challenges. The HCD method has three phases: Inspiration, Ideation, and Implementation. This study focused on the first and second. In the Inspiration phase we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of stakeholders who had either received or participated in the care of Medicaid-insured pregnant people within our community, with a specific emphasis on representation from marginalized communities. Using a general inductive approach to thematic analysis, we identified themes, which were then framed into design opportunities. In the Ideation phase, we conducted structured brainstorming sessions to generate potential prototypes of solutions, which were tested and iterated upon through a series of community events and engagement with a diverse community advisory group.
RESULTS RESULTS
We engaged a total of 171 stakeholders across both phases of the HCD methodology. In the Inspiration phase, interviews with 23 community members and an eight-person focus group revealed seven insights centered around two main themes: (1) racism and discrimination create major barriers to access, experience, and the ability to deliver high-value pregnancy care; (2) pregnancy care is overmedicalized and does not treat the pregnant person as an equal and informed partner. In the Ideation phase, 162 ideas were produced and translated into eight solution prototypes. Community scoring and feedback events with 140 stakeholders led to the progressive refinement and selection of three final prototypes: (1) implementing telemedicine (video visits) within the safety-net system, (2) integrating community-based peer support workers into healthcare teams, and (3) delivering co-located pregnancy-related care and services into high-need neighborhoods as a one-stop shop.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Using HCD methodology and a collaborative community-health system approach, we identified gaps, opportunities, and solutions to address perinatal care inequities within our urban community. Given the urgent need for implementable and effective solutions, the design process was particularly well-suited because it focuses on understanding and centering the needs and values of stakeholders, is multi-disciplinary through all phases, and results in prototyping and iteration of real-world solutions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34284758
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06609-8
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06609-8
pmc: PMC8293556
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

714

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):1027-1037
pubmed: 32282594
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;201:127-135
pubmed: 29494846
Am J Public Health. 2019 Oct;109(10):1342-1345
pubmed: 31415204
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jan 12;33(Supplement_1):37-44
pubmed: 33068104
Med Anthropol. 2019 Oct;38(7):560-573
pubmed: 30521376
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Apr;93(4):458-466
pubmed: 29545005
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Jan 16;15:2
pubmed: 25591945
Public Health Rep. 2001 Jul-Aug;116(4):306-16
pubmed: 12037259
Inf Technol Dev. 2019 Sep 29;26(3):477-505
pubmed: 32982007
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117
pubmed: 30264690
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2019 Apr/Jun;33(2):108-115
pubmed: 31021935
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Feb;4(1):79-86
pubmed: 26823064
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;44(1):13-25
pubmed: 28160890
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44
pubmed: 24193818
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;238:112491
pubmed: 31434029
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Mar;4(1):11-4
pubmed: 27001093

Auteurs

Malini A Nijagal (MA)

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UCSF/ZSFG, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Building 5, 6D-9, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA. malini.nijagal@ucsf.edu.

Devika Patel (D)

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

Courtney Lyles (C)

Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco at San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, USA.

Jennifer Liao (J)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.

Lara Chehab (L)

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

Schyneida Williams (S)

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UCSF/ZSFG, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Building 5, 6D-9, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.

Amanda Sammann (A)

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH