Trimodality Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Institutional Experience.


Journal

Advances in radiation oncology
ISSN: 2452-1094
Titre abrégé: Adv Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101677247

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 06 12 2020
revised: 07 04 2021
accepted: 27 04 2021
entrez: 21 7 2021
pubmed: 22 7 2021
medline: 22 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

As an alternative to radical cystectomy, tri-modality treatment (TMT) is an effective treatment approach for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The purpose of this report is to contribute to the literature by summarizing institutional outcomes of a bladder-preserving TMT approach for patients with MIBC. Patients treated with TMT for MIBC from 1998 to 2019 were identified. Patient, disease, and treatment factors were recorded. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and bladder-preserved DFS were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards regression. Thirty-two patients treated with TMT to a median dose of 64.8 Gy for T2 (78%), T3 (19%), and T4 (3%) disease were followed for a median of 19 months (mean, 36; range, 6-213); 31% had associated carcinoma in situ; 25% had associated hydronephrosis. Cisplatin was the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent. OS rates were 84% at 1 year and 61% at 5 years. DFS rates were 84% and 61% and bladder-preserved DFS rates were 84% and 60% at 1 year and 5 years, respectively. Salvage cystectomy rates at 1 year and 5 years were 4% and 9%, respectively. Four patients had locally invasive recurrences at 8, 11, 34, and 37 months after initial MIBC diagnosis, 2 of whom underwent salvage radical cystectomy. Ten (31%) patients developed distant disease at a median of 13 months after diagnosis. Unlike local recurrence, distant recurrences were associated with worse OS and hazard ratios of 3.4 ( OS and DFS were comparable to those of published data. Our outcomes support TMT as an effective option for carefully selected patients with MIBC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34286164
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100718
pii: S2452-1094(21)00076-2
pmc: PMC8273199
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100718

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Références

J Clin Oncol. 1998 Nov;16(11):3576-83
pubmed: 9817278
Trials. 2011 Mar 15;12:78
pubmed: 21406089
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):38-45
pubmed: 30686350
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3801-9
pubmed: 25366678
Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):952-960
pubmed: 28081860
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 28;349(9):859-66
pubmed: 12944571
Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):120-37
pubmed: 24613684
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 1;19(3):666-75
pubmed: 11157016
BJU Int. 2020 Feb;125(2):270-275
pubmed: 31310696

Auteurs

Praneet Polineni (P)

Departments of Radiation Oncology.

Laura Ashack (L)

Departments of Radiation Oncology.

John Kalapurakal (J)

Departments of Radiation Oncology.

Alicia Morgans (A)

Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division.

David VanderWeele (D)

Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division.

Shilajit Kundu (S)

Urology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Maha Hussain (M)

Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division.

Joshua Meeks (J)

Urology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Sean Sachdev (S)

Departments of Radiation Oncology.

Classifications MeSH