Trimodality Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Institutional Experience.
Journal
Advances in radiation oncology
ISSN: 2452-1094
Titre abrégé: Adv Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101677247
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
06
12
2020
revised:
07
04
2021
accepted:
27
04
2021
entrez:
21
7
2021
pubmed:
22
7
2021
medline:
22
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As an alternative to radical cystectomy, tri-modality treatment (TMT) is an effective treatment approach for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The purpose of this report is to contribute to the literature by summarizing institutional outcomes of a bladder-preserving TMT approach for patients with MIBC. Patients treated with TMT for MIBC from 1998 to 2019 were identified. Patient, disease, and treatment factors were recorded. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and bladder-preserved DFS were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards regression. Thirty-two patients treated with TMT to a median dose of 64.8 Gy for T2 (78%), T3 (19%), and T4 (3%) disease were followed for a median of 19 months (mean, 36; range, 6-213); 31% had associated carcinoma in situ; 25% had associated hydronephrosis. Cisplatin was the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent. OS rates were 84% at 1 year and 61% at 5 years. DFS rates were 84% and 61% and bladder-preserved DFS rates were 84% and 60% at 1 year and 5 years, respectively. Salvage cystectomy rates at 1 year and 5 years were 4% and 9%, respectively. Four patients had locally invasive recurrences at 8, 11, 34, and 37 months after initial MIBC diagnosis, 2 of whom underwent salvage radical cystectomy. Ten (31%) patients developed distant disease at a median of 13 months after diagnosis. Unlike local recurrence, distant recurrences were associated with worse OS and hazard ratios of 3.4 ( OS and DFS were comparable to those of published data. Our outcomes support TMT as an effective option for carefully selected patients with MIBC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34286164
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100718
pii: S2452-1094(21)00076-2
pmc: PMC8273199
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100718Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Nov;16(11):3576-83
pubmed: 9817278
Trials. 2011 Mar 15;12:78
pubmed: 21406089
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):38-45
pubmed: 30686350
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3801-9
pubmed: 25366678
Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):952-960
pubmed: 28081860
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 28;349(9):859-66
pubmed: 12944571
Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):120-37
pubmed: 24613684
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 1;19(3):666-75
pubmed: 11157016
BJU Int. 2020 Feb;125(2):270-275
pubmed: 31310696