Ultrastructural analysis of Lyophilized Human Spermatozoa.

cryopreservation human semen lyophilization transmission electron microscopy

Journal

JBRA assisted reproduction
ISSN: 1518-0557
Titre abrégé: JBRA Assist Reprod
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101684552

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 07 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 22 7 2021
medline: 2 2 2022
entrez: 21 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Lyophilization is potentially more practical and cost-effective alternative for sperm preservation. However, there are no studies that evaluate the ultrastructure of human spermatozoa after lyophilization. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the ultrasctructure of lyophilized spermatozoa using Transmission Electron Microscopy. From a total of 21 donated seminal samples, 30 aliquots were originated and divided into two aliquots so that one could have been submitted to cryopreservation/thaw and the other for lyophilization/rehydration. The liquefied aliquots were homogenized at room temperature. Samples assigned for cryopreservation were placed in straws and samples assigned for lyophilization were placed in the appropriate vials. Cryopreservation samples were placed at -30oC for 30 minutes subsequently for 30 minutes at vapour phase and then plunged into liquid nitrogen. Lately, were warmed in water bath at 37oC for 10 minutes followed by 10 minutes centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended and analysed in a Makler chamber. The semen vials assigned for lyophilization were loaded into a pre-fixed freeze-drying chamber. Following lyophilization, vials were removed from the freeze-drying chamber and kept at 4oC until rehydration. TEM was performed after rehydration and thawing. Sperm samples were fixed, rinsed in buffer, post fixed and dehydration was carried out in escalating concentrations of alcohol solution, acetone and then, embedding in Epon resin. Ultrathin sections were stained and examined in a Transmission Electron Microscope. Analysis of sperm after freezing/thawing using Transmission Electron Microscopy showed lesions to the midpiece, with some mitochondria degeneration and random rupture of plasma membrane. In the head, we identified intact plasma membrane, nucleus and acrosome, as in the flagellum all main structures remained intact including the plasma membrane, the longitudinal columns of dense fibers and the semicircular fibers. Analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy showed that spermatozoa heads had ruptured plasma membranes, absence of acrosomes, nuclei with heterogeneous and decompressed chromatin. Mitochondria were deteriorated in the midpiece. Longitudinal columns of dense fibers were absent in the flagellum. Axonemes, in cross-sections, were disrupted with disorganized structures. To our knowledge, our study demonstrated, for the first time, the structure of the human spermatozoa after lyophilization using Transmission Electron Microscopy. The use of a fixed lyophilization protocol with media containing cryoprotectants might explain the damage to the structures. More studies are necessary to improve the results of sperm lyophilization. In the future, the use of lyophilization of spermatozoa might reduce the costs of fertility preservation, since there will be no need for storage space and transportation is simpler.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34286941
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210028
pmc: PMC8312306
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

473-479

Références

Anim Reprod Sci. 2018 Mar;190:85-93
pubmed: 29397252
Cryo Letters. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):277-85
pubmed: 25282494
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000 Apr;17(4):218-21
pubmed: 10955246
Biol Reprod. 2003 Jan;68(1):136-9
pubmed: 12493705
Nat Biotechnol. 1998 Jul;16(7):639-41
pubmed: 9661196
Andrologia. 2016 Mar;48(2):203-10
pubmed: 25988980
Fertil Steril. 2003 Sep;80(3):531-5
pubmed: 12969693
Hum Reprod. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):2007-2015
pubmed: 28938751
Transfusion. 2009 Sep;49(9):1924-30
pubmed: 19453977
Cryobiology. 2005 Jun;50(3):231-8
pubmed: 15925575
Hum Reprod Update. 1996 Nov-Dec;2(6):553-9
pubmed: 9111188
Hum Reprod. 2018 Nov 1;33(11):1975-1983
pubmed: 30285105
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 6;114(23):5988-5993
pubmed: 28533361
Biol Reprod. 2005 Oct;73(4):627-33
pubmed: 15930320
Mol Reprod Dev. 2008 May;75(5):890-4
pubmed: 17926349
Biol Reprod. 2004 Jun;70(6):1776-81
pubmed: 14960482
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 20;98(24):13501-6
pubmed: 11707598
Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Jun;12(6):779-96
pubmed: 16792858
Reprod Domest Anim. 2020 Jan;55(1):29-37
pubmed: 31626708
MethodsX. 2019 Sep 18;6:2198-2204
pubmed: 31667120
Biol Reprod. 2003 Dec;69(6):2100-8
pubmed: 12930716
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Sep;11(3):300-8
pubmed: 16176668
Zygote. 2005 Feb;13(1):79-85
pubmed: 15984166
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Aug;36(8):1713-1720
pubmed: 31273587
Cryobiology. 2015 Oct;71(2):286-90
pubmed: 26247315
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Mar;24(3):301-7
pubmed: 22285239
J Reprod Dev. 2011 Apr;57(2):176-82
pubmed: 21551975
Cryobiology. 2003 Apr;46(2):146-52
pubmed: 12686204
Theriogenology. 2007 May;67(8):1307-15
pubmed: 17383718
Reproduction. 2007 Apr;133(4):841-6
pubmed: 17504927
Cryobiology. 2006 Oct;53(2):279-82
pubmed: 16870171
Fertil Steril. 2012 May;97(5):1067-1073.e1
pubmed: 22386843
Comp Med. 2005 Apr;55(2):140-4
pubmed: 15884775
Reproduction. 2011 Oct;142(4):529-38
pubmed: 21846810
Cryobiology. 2019 Apr;87:105-109
pubmed: 30682339
J Equine Vet Sci. 2019 Jan;72:8-15
pubmed: 30929788
Fertil Steril. 2004 Oct;82(4):913-8
pubmed: 15482768
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e113381
pubmed: 25409172
Hum Reprod. 1997 May;12(5):994-1001
pubmed: 9194653
J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1079-84
pubmed: 14501696
Hum Reprod. 2008 Feb;23(2):233-9
pubmed: 18056060
Biopreserv Biobank. 2019 Apr;17(2):171-182
pubmed: 30499684
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:74-79
pubmed: 31234060
Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):153-64
pubmed: 19109313
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Mar;10(3):350-4
pubmed: 15820041
Biol Reprod. 2004 Nov;71(5):1430-6
pubmed: 15215192
Cryobiology. 2015 Oct;71(2):329-33
pubmed: 26277039
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019 Nov;47(11):797-801
pubmed: 31593817
Hum Reprod. 1999 Dec;14(12):2941-3
pubmed: 10601075

Auteurs

Renata de Lima Bossi (RL)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
ORIGEN, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Marcelo Cabral (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Monica Oliveira (M)

Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Sávia Lopes (S)

Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Rodrigo Hurtado (R)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
ORIGEN, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Marcos Sampaio (M)

ORIGEN, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Selmo Geber (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
ORIGEN, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH