Patient and Family Engagement Approaches for Digital Health Initiatives: Protocol for a Case Study.

case study digital health mental health patient and family engagement patient engagement

Journal

JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 05 10 2020
accepted: 13 05 2021
revised: 31 03 2021
entrez: 21 7 2021
pubmed: 22 7 2021
medline: 22 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Digital health initiatives such as patient portals, virtual care platforms, and smartphone-based apps are being implemented at a rapid pace in health care organizations worldwide. This is often done to improve access beyond traditional in-person care and enhance care quality. Recent studies have indicated that better outcomes of using these initiatives and technologies may be achieved when patients and their family members are engaged in all aspects of planning, implementation, use, and evaluation. However, little guidance exists for how health care administrators can achieve effective engagement in digital health initiatives specifically. The objective of this study is to document processes related to planning and implementing patient and family engagement (PFE) in digital health initiatives. This information will be used to develop tangible resources (eg, a field guide) that other organizations can use to implement PFE approaches for digital health initiatives in their organizations. A previously developed multidimensional conceptual framework for PFE in health and health care contexts will be used to guide this work. To understand the intricacies involved in using PFE approaches in digital health strategies, a case study will be conducted. More specifically, this work will employ an embedded single-case design with PFE in digital health initiatives at a large Canadian mental health and addictions teaching hospital. Multiple digital health projects being undertaken at the study site will be explored to better understand where the PFE is intended to support the design, implementation, and operation of the digital health platform or technology. These projects will form the individual units of analysis. Data collection will involve field notes and artifact collection by a participant observer and interviews with the various digital health project teams. Data analysis will include a content and thematic analysis, triangulation of the findings, and a chronological mapping of data to a PFE process. Funding for this work was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), via a Health System Impact Fellowship. As of August 2020, digital health projects that will form the case study units have been identified, and the participant observer has started to embed themselves into these projects. Although the development and collection of field notes and artifacts, respectively, have begun, interviews have not been conducted. The study is expected to conclude in September 2021. Once this study is complete, the development of a field guide and resources to support the uptake of PFE strategies in digital health will begin. By better understanding the processes involved in PFE in digital health projects, guidance can be provided to relevant stakeholders and organizations about how to do this work in an effective manner. It is then anticipated that with the increasing use of PFE approaches, there may be improved uptake, experience, and outcomes associated with using digital health technologies. PRR1-10.2196/24274.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Digital health initiatives such as patient portals, virtual care platforms, and smartphone-based apps are being implemented at a rapid pace in health care organizations worldwide. This is often done to improve access beyond traditional in-person care and enhance care quality. Recent studies have indicated that better outcomes of using these initiatives and technologies may be achieved when patients and their family members are engaged in all aspects of planning, implementation, use, and evaluation. However, little guidance exists for how health care administrators can achieve effective engagement in digital health initiatives specifically.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to document processes related to planning and implementing patient and family engagement (PFE) in digital health initiatives. This information will be used to develop tangible resources (eg, a field guide) that other organizations can use to implement PFE approaches for digital health initiatives in their organizations.
METHODS METHODS
A previously developed multidimensional conceptual framework for PFE in health and health care contexts will be used to guide this work. To understand the intricacies involved in using PFE approaches in digital health strategies, a case study will be conducted. More specifically, this work will employ an embedded single-case design with PFE in digital health initiatives at a large Canadian mental health and addictions teaching hospital. Multiple digital health projects being undertaken at the study site will be explored to better understand where the PFE is intended to support the design, implementation, and operation of the digital health platform or technology. These projects will form the individual units of analysis. Data collection will involve field notes and artifact collection by a participant observer and interviews with the various digital health project teams. Data analysis will include a content and thematic analysis, triangulation of the findings, and a chronological mapping of data to a PFE process.
RESULTS RESULTS
Funding for this work was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), via a Health System Impact Fellowship. As of August 2020, digital health projects that will form the case study units have been identified, and the participant observer has started to embed themselves into these projects. Although the development and collection of field notes and artifacts, respectively, have begun, interviews have not been conducted. The study is expected to conclude in September 2021. Once this study is complete, the development of a field guide and resources to support the uptake of PFE strategies in digital health will begin.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
By better understanding the processes involved in PFE in digital health projects, guidance can be provided to relevant stakeholders and organizations about how to do this work in an effective manner. It is then anticipated that with the increasing use of PFE approaches, there may be improved uptake, experience, and outcomes associated with using digital health technologies.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
PRR1-10.2196/24274.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34287212
pii: v10i7e24274
doi: 10.2196/24274
pmc: PMC8339977
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e24274

Informations de copyright

©Nelson Shen, Damian Jankowicz, Gillian Strudwick. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 21.07.2021.

Références

Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31
pubmed: 23381514
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2006 Aug;Chapter 12:Unit 12.1
pubmed: 18428388
Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 18;8(1):97
pubmed: 30999950
Phys Ther. 2014 Sep;94(9):1208-9
pubmed: 25180296
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 16;18(11):e294
pubmed: 27852556
HERD. 2016 Jul;9(4):16-25
pubmed: 26791375
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Sep;102(9):1581-1589
pubmed: 31053247
Milbank Q. 2014 Jun;92(2):319-50
pubmed: 24890250
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Mar 26;7(3):e18848
pubmed: 32213476
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 01;19(11):e367
pubmed: 29092808
BMJ. 2010 Nov 16;341:c5814
pubmed: 21081595
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):13-6
pubmed: 23785099
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Dec 30;8(6):325-328
pubmed: 31256564
Am J Med Sci. 2016 Jan;351(1):59-68
pubmed: 26802759
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 05;20(2):e41
pubmed: 29402759
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Sep;41(5):545-7
pubmed: 25158659
Harv Bus Rev. 2008 Jun;86(6):84-92, 141
pubmed: 18605031
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 8;21(10):e14683
pubmed: 31596241
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 16;22(6):e19284
pubmed: 32501804
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:110-114
pubmed: 30741182
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Oct;63:150-156
pubmed: 27515924
World Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;14(2):223-30
pubmed: 26043340
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5
pubmed: 29415734
Res Nurs Health. 2011 Apr;34(2):153-9
pubmed: 21381044
PLoS Med. 2010 Nov 02;7(11):e1000360
pubmed: 21072245
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 15;14:175
pubmed: 24735787
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Oct 17;2:103
pubmed: 31637310
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:31-37
pubmed: 28750909
Health Expect. 2015 Apr;18(2):153-65
pubmed: 23252574
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Mar 1;64(5):536-43
pubmed: 17322168
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jun 27;11:100
pubmed: 21707982

Auteurs

Nelson Shen (N)

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Damian Jankowicz (D)

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Gillian Strudwick (G)

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH