Does Variceal Drainage Affect Arteriovenous Malformation Obliteration and Hemorrhage Rates After Stereotactic Radiosurgery? A Case-Matched Analysis.
Arteriovenous malformations
Hemorrhage
Radiosurgery
Varix
Journal
Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1524-4040
Titre abrégé: Neurosurgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802914
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 09 2021
15 09 2021
Historique:
received:
08
12
2020
accepted:
08
05
2021
pubmed:
23
7
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
entrez:
22
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely accepted as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery in the management of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Dilated AVM outflow veins or varices may be caused by high-flow or partial outflow obstruction, which may increase the risk of a hemorrhage before or after SRS. To compare the obliteration and hemorrhage risks in patients with and without AVM varices (AVMv). From our prospective database of 1012 AVM patients who underwent Gamma Knife® (Elekta) SRS, we identified 103 patients with AVMv, and 847 patients without varices. The median follow-up was 52 mo. Balancing variable score matching was performed to compare obliteration and hemorrhage rates between the 2 groups. Obliteration rates in the AVMv group were 38% at 3 yr, 65% at 4 yr, and 70% at 5 yr. Patients with an AVMv had no difference in the final obliteration rate compared to patients who did not have variceal drainage (P = .35). Actuarial hemorrhage after SRS in the matched patients with AVMv was 4.9%, 13%, and 13.7%, at 1, 3, and 5 yr, respectively. The rate of hemorrhage in the group with no varix was 2.9%, 5.4%, and 9.1% at 1, 3, and 5 yr, respectively (P = .14). The presence of AVM variceal venous drainage did not affect the obliteration rate and did not confer a higher risk of a subsequent hemorrhage both before and after SRS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely accepted as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery in the management of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Dilated AVM outflow veins or varices may be caused by high-flow or partial outflow obstruction, which may increase the risk of a hemorrhage before or after SRS.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the obliteration and hemorrhage risks in patients with and without AVM varices (AVMv).
METHODS
From our prospective database of 1012 AVM patients who underwent Gamma Knife® (Elekta) SRS, we identified 103 patients with AVMv, and 847 patients without varices. The median follow-up was 52 mo. Balancing variable score matching was performed to compare obliteration and hemorrhage rates between the 2 groups.
RESULTS
Obliteration rates in the AVMv group were 38% at 3 yr, 65% at 4 yr, and 70% at 5 yr. Patients with an AVMv had no difference in the final obliteration rate compared to patients who did not have variceal drainage (P = .35). Actuarial hemorrhage after SRS in the matched patients with AVMv was 4.9%, 13%, and 13.7%, at 1, 3, and 5 yr, respectively. The rate of hemorrhage in the group with no varix was 2.9%, 5.4%, and 9.1% at 1, 3, and 5 yr, respectively (P = .14).
CONCLUSION
The presence of AVM variceal venous drainage did not affect the obliteration rate and did not confer a higher risk of a subsequent hemorrhage both before and after SRS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34293174
pii: 6325676
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab256
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
680-685Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021.