Neonatal Lung Ultrasound and Surfactant Administration: A Pragmatic, Multicenter Study.


Journal

Chest
ISSN: 1931-3543
Titre abrégé: Chest
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0231335

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 26 03 2021
revised: 23 06 2021
accepted: 23 06 2021
pubmed: 23 7 2021
medline: 20 1 2022
entrez: 22 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Previous research shows that a lung ultrasound score (LUS) can anticipate CPAP failure in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Can LUS also predict the need for surfactant replacement? Multicenter, pragmatic study of preterm neonates who underwent lung ultrasound at birth and those given surfactant by masked physicians, who also were scanned within 24 h from administration. Clinical data and respiratory support variables were recorded. Accuracy of LUS, oxygen saturation to Fio Two hundred forty infants were enrolled. One hundred eight received at least one dose of surfactant. LUS predicted the first surfactant administration with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91), cut off of 9, sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86), specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), positive predictive value of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87), negative predictive value of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.89), positive likelihood ratio of 4.65 (95% CI, 3.14-6.89), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 (95% CI, 0.18-0.37). No significant difference was shown among different GA groups: 25 to 27 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99), 28 to 30 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.91), and 31 to 33 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95), respectively. LUS declined significantly within 24 h in infants receiving one surfactant dose. When comparing Fio LUS is a reliable criterion to administer the first surfactant dose regardless of GA. Its association with oxygen saturation to Fio

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Previous research shows that a lung ultrasound score (LUS) can anticipate CPAP failure in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Can LUS also predict the need for surfactant replacement?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
Multicenter, pragmatic study of preterm neonates who underwent lung ultrasound at birth and those given surfactant by masked physicians, who also were scanned within 24 h from administration. Clinical data and respiratory support variables were recorded. Accuracy of LUS, oxygen saturation to Fio
RESULTS
Two hundred forty infants were enrolled. One hundred eight received at least one dose of surfactant. LUS predicted the first surfactant administration with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91), cut off of 9, sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86), specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), positive predictive value of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87), negative predictive value of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.89), positive likelihood ratio of 4.65 (95% CI, 3.14-6.89), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 (95% CI, 0.18-0.37). No significant difference was shown among different GA groups: 25 to 27 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99), 28 to 30 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.91), and 31 to 33 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95), respectively. LUS declined significantly within 24 h in infants receiving one surfactant dose. When comparing Fio
INTERPRETATION
LUS is a reliable criterion to administer the first surfactant dose regardless of GA. Its association with oxygen saturation to Fio

Identifiants

pubmed: 34293317
pii: S0012-3692(21)01354-4
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.076
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pulmonary Surfactants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2178-2186

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Francesco Raimondi (F)

Division of Neonatology and Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Università"Federico II" di Napoli, Naples, Italy. Electronic address: raimondi@unina.it.

Fiorella Migliaro (F)

Division of Neonatology and Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Università"Federico II" di Napoli, Naples, Italy.

Iuri Corsini (I)

Division of Neonatology, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Fabio Meneghin (F)

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Vittore Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Luca Pierri (L)

Division of Neonatology and Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Università"Federico II" di Napoli, Naples, Italy.

Serena Salomè (S)

Division of Neonatology and Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Università"Federico II" di Napoli, Naples, Italy.

Alessandro Perri (A)

Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Neonatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Salvatore Aversa (S)

Division of Neonatology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Stefano Nobile (S)

Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Neonatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Silvia Lama (S)

Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Silvia Varano (S)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche and Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.

Marilena Savoia (M)

Division of Neonatology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Sara Gatto (S)

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Vittore Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Valentina Leonardi (V)

Division of Neonatology, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Letizia Capasso (L)

Division of Neonatology and Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Università"Federico II" di Napoli, Naples, Italy.

Virgilio Paolo Carnielli (VP)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche and Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.

Fabio Mosca (F)

Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Carlo Dani (C)

Division of Neonatology, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Giovanni Vento (G)

Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Neonatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Pasquale Dolce (P)

Department of Public Health, Università"Federico II" di Napoli, Naples, Italy.

Gianluca Lista (G)

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Vittore Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH