Effect of Lens Vault on the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas in Shallow Anterior Chamber Eyes.


Journal

American journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1879-1891
Titre abrégé: Am J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2022
Historique:
received: 01 05 2021
revised: 11 07 2021
accepted: 12 07 2021
pubmed: 23 7 2021
medline: 1 2 2022
entrez: 22 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To explore the impact of preoperative lens vault (LV) on the accuracy of the Barrett Universal Ⅱ, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Hoffer QST, Holladay 1, Kane, and SRK/T formulas in eyes with a shallow anterior chamber. Retrospective case series. Included were 409 eyes with anterior chamber depth (ACD) shallower than 3.0 mm that underwent phacoemulsification. Eyes were divided into a short axial length (AL) group (<22.00 mm) and a normal AL group (22.00 ≤ AL < 24.50 mm). Each group was further divided into a small LV subgroup (LV <0.95 mm) and a large LV subgroup (LV ≥0.95 mm) according to the median of the preoperative LV. Postoperative refraction was measured 3 months after surgery. Mean absolute error (MAE) was calculated and compared for each formula. The correlation between LV and the mean numeric error predicted by each formula was analyzed. Overall, the Barrett and Kane formulas generated the smallest MAE in both short AL and normal AL groups (P < .05 for both). In short AL eyes with small LV, the Haigis formula performed better than other traditional formulas (P < .05 for all). In normal AL eyes with a small LV, the Barrett and Kane formulas showed higher accuracy (P < .05 for all), and other formulas were comparable. In either subgroup with a large LV, the Haigis formula created a significant higher MAE (P < .001 for all), followed by Hoffer QST. Positive correlations were found between LV and mean numeric errors predicted by all formulas, except for Barrett and Kane formulas (P < .001 for all), indicating a postoperative hyperopic shift with an increased LV. In shallow anterior chamber eyes with a large LV, the Haigis and Hoffer QST formulas taking preoperative ACD into calculation surprisingly showed a larger prediction error. However, the Barrett and the Kane formulas, which include both ACD and lens thickness as predictive parameters, showed good accuracy in both small and large LV subgroups. Therefore, although formulas referring to preoperative ACD are generally believed to achieve better refractive results in patients with a shallow anterior chamber, LV may be valuable to consider when choosing an IOL power calculation formula.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34293335
pii: S0002-9394(21)00379-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.07.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

57-67

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Chenxi Yan (C)

From the Eye Center (C.Y., K.Y.) of the 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

Ke Yao (K)

From the Eye Center (C.Y., K.Y.) of the 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. Electronic address: xlren@zju.edu.cn.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH