Inclusive Leadership and Career Sustainability: Mediating Roles of Supervisor Developmental Feedback and Thriving at Work.
China
career sustainability
inclusive leadership
supervisor developmental feedback
thriving at work
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
24
02
2021
accepted:
10
05
2021
entrez:
23
7
2021
pubmed:
24
7
2021
medline:
24
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Career sustainability is a well-researched issue in academics and other sectors. Technology advancements and COVID-19 have jeopardized career sustainability. Numerous studies have explored the influence of individual characteristics on career sustainability, but few have focused on leadership. In addition, cultural factors must be considered because leadership is rooted in culture. In particular, inclusive leadership reflects traditional Chinese culture. Therefore, based on self-determination social exchange theories, we analyzed the effects of inclusive leadership on career sustainability as well as the roles of thriving at work and supervisor developmental feedback (SDF) in career sustainability. In total, 363 samples were collected from China. The results revealed that inclusive leadership improves career sustainability through SDF and thriving at work. Theoretically, our study fills the research gap and establishes a mechanism and theoretical framework for inclusive leadership and career sustainability. Practically, we offer guidance for enterprises to cultivate inclusive leadership and improve career sustainability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34295283
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671663
pmc: PMC8291222
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
671663Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Fang, Ren, Chen, Chin, Yuan and Lin.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 06;10:1803
pubmed: 31447740
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Nov;96(6):1317-27
pubmed: 21688879
J Organ Behav. 2017 Jan;38(1):108-123
pubmed: 28133415
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903
pubmed: 14516251
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Jun;88(3):413-22
pubmed: 12814291
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 03;17(11):
pubmed: 32503169
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Jan;23(1):31-43
pubmed: 27631555
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 20;11:62
pubmed: 32153448
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 22;10:2960
pubmed: 32038369
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;87(2):246-60
pubmed: 15301630
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 09;10:1581
pubmed: 31338055
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 11;12:632787
pubmed: 33776854
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Apr;24(3):357-65
pubmed: 26264773
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2013;56(2):127-45
pubmed: 23350567
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Sep;27(3):467-476
pubmed: 27837374
J Vocat Behav. 2020 Jun;119:103436
pubmed: 32390656
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Jun;87(3):565-73
pubmed: 12090614