Changes of renal function after retrograde intrarenal surgery using flexible ureteroscope in renal stone patients.

Renal stones nomogram model predictor renal function retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)

Journal

Translational andrology and urology
ISSN: 2223-4691
Titre abrégé: Transl Androl Urol
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101581119

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 25 12 2020
accepted: 06 04 2021
entrez: 23 7 2021
pubmed: 24 7 2021
medline: 24 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is widely performed for renal stones. Theoretically, removing renal stones could prevent the deterioration of renal function. However, two studies reported that not all patients would see an increase in renal function after RIRS. The aim of our study was to evaluate the change of renal function of the operative site, and to identify predictors of improvement or deterioration of renal function after RIRS. We retrospectively reviewed renal stones patients who received RIRS and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before and after surgery. Improved renal function was defined as the change of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >10% postoperatively, and that <-10% was regarded as deteriorated renal function. Logistic and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analyses were used to identify predictors for the improvement or deterioration of renal function, and predictive nomogram models were built. A total of 120 renal stone patients were included. Twenty-one (17.5%), 79 (65.8%) and 20 (16.7%) patients had improved, stable and deteriorated renal function of operative site after surgery, respectively. Lower alkaline phosphatase, lower low-density lipoprotein, lower GFR of the operative site, thicker renal parenchyma, higher serum creatinine, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) history were associated with the improved renal function. The predictive accuracy of the model for the improved renal function was 0.800. Additionally, older age, longer flexible ureteroscopic time, thinner renal parenchyma and existence of ureteral stones were risk factors for deteriorated renal function. The predictive accuracy of the model for the deteriorated renal function was 0.725. The renal function of most renal stone patients did not decrease after RIRS. For patients with potential deterioration of renal function postoperatively, urologists could shorten flexible ureteroscopic time to prevent the occurrence of this outcome.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is widely performed for renal stones. Theoretically, removing renal stones could prevent the deterioration of renal function. However, two studies reported that not all patients would see an increase in renal function after RIRS. The aim of our study was to evaluate the change of renal function of the operative site, and to identify predictors of improvement or deterioration of renal function after RIRS.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed renal stones patients who received RIRS and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before and after surgery. Improved renal function was defined as the change of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >10% postoperatively, and that <-10% was regarded as deteriorated renal function. Logistic and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analyses were used to identify predictors for the improvement or deterioration of renal function, and predictive nomogram models were built.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 120 renal stone patients were included. Twenty-one (17.5%), 79 (65.8%) and 20 (16.7%) patients had improved, stable and deteriorated renal function of operative site after surgery, respectively. Lower alkaline phosphatase, lower low-density lipoprotein, lower GFR of the operative site, thicker renal parenchyma, higher serum creatinine, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) history were associated with the improved renal function. The predictive accuracy of the model for the improved renal function was 0.800. Additionally, older age, longer flexible ureteroscopic time, thinner renal parenchyma and existence of ureteral stones were risk factors for deteriorated renal function. The predictive accuracy of the model for the deteriorated renal function was 0.725.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The renal function of most renal stone patients did not decrease after RIRS. For patients with potential deterioration of renal function postoperatively, urologists could shorten flexible ureteroscopic time to prevent the occurrence of this outcome.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34295719
doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1521
pii: tau-10-06-2320
pmc: PMC8261420
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2320-2331

Informations de copyright

2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1521). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

World J Urol. 2016 May;34(5):725-32
pubmed: 26226940
Pediatr Nephrol. 2010 Apr;25(4):687-97
pubmed: 19844747
Yonsei Med J. 2012 Jul 1;53(4):708-14
pubmed: 22665335
Curr Urol Rep. 2020 Mar 24;21(4):17
pubmed: 32211985
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Jun;16(3):329.e1-329.e8
pubmed: 32146062
J Inflamm (Lond). 2010 Apr 22;7:19
pubmed: 20412564
Ren Fail. 2019 Nov;41(1):718-725
pubmed: 31409217
J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):1033-41
pubmed: 22819101
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Jun;22(6):1578-86
pubmed: 17347284
BJU Int. 2019 Feb;123(2):220-232
pubmed: 30656839
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Sep-Oct;41(5):920-6
pubmed: 26689517
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2035851
pubmed: 28553645
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 4):S371-S380
pubmed: 31656743
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):724-9
pubmed: 25015037
Asian J Urol. 2018 Oct;5(4):205-214
pubmed: 30364478
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1301-1320
pubmed: 28213860
J Urol. 2010 Sep;184(3):1111-4
pubmed: 20650495
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):124-132
pubmed: 29943184
Maturitas. 2012 Nov;73(3):230-8
pubmed: 22951150

Auteurs

Yu Liu (Y)

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Zhongyu Jian (Z)

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China Biomedical Big Data Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Yucheng Ma (Y)

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Yuntian Chen (Y)

Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Xi Jin (X)

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Liang Zhou (L)

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Kunjie Wang (K)

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Hong Li (H)

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Classifications MeSH