A multicentre and multi-national evaluation of the accuracy of quantitative Lu-177 SPECT/CT imaging performed within the MRTDosimetry project.

177Lu SPECT/CT imaging 3D printing Harmonization of SPECT/CT imaging International multicenter comparison exercise Molecular radiotherapy (MRT) Phantom Quantitative SPECT/CT Standardization of SPECT/CT imaging Traceability of SPECT/CT imaging

Journal

EJNMMI physics
ISSN: 2197-7364
Titre abrégé: EJNMMI Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101658952

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 26 04 2021
accepted: 21 06 2021
entrez: 23 7 2021
pubmed: 24 7 2021
medline: 24 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patient-specific dosimetry is required to ensure the safety of molecular radiotherapy and to predict response. Dosimetry involves several steps, the first of which is the determination of the activity of the radiopharmaceutical taken up by an organ/lesion over time. As uncertainties propagate along each of the subsequent steps (integration of the time-activity curve, absorbed dose calculation), establishing a reliable activity quantification is essential. The MRTDosimetry project was a European initiative to bring together expertise in metrology and nuclear medicine research, with one main goal of standardizing quantitative The inter-comparison included nine SPECT/CT systems. Each site performed a set of three measurements with the same setup (system, acquisition and reconstruction): (1) Determination of an image calibration for conversion from counts to activity concentration (large cylinder phantom), (2) determination of recovery coefficients for partial volume correction (IEC NEMA PET body phantom with sphere inserts), (3) validation of the established quantitative imaging setup using a 3D printed two-organ phantom (ICRP110-based kidney and spleen). In contrast to previous efforts, traceability of the activity measurement was required for each participant, and all participants were asked to calculate uncertainties for their SPECT-based activities. Similar combinations of imaging system and reconstruction lead to similar image calibration factors. The activity ratio results of the anthropomorphic phantom validation demonstrate significant harmonization of quantitative imaging performance between the sites with all sites falling within one standard deviation of the mean values for all inserts. Activity recovery was underestimated for total kidney, spleen, and kidney cortex, while it was overestimated for the medulla. This international comparison exercise demonstrates that harmonization of quantitative SPECT/CT is feasible when following very specific instructions of a dedicated calibration protocol, as developed within the MRTDosimetry project. While quantitative imaging performance demonstrates significant harmonization, an over- and underestimation of the activity recovery highlights the limitations of any partial volume correction in the presence of spill-in and spill-out between two adjacent volumes of interests.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34297218
doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00397-0
pii: 10.1186/s40658-021-00397-0
pmc: PMC8302709
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

55

Subventions

Organisme : European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research
ID : 15HLT06 MRTDosimetry
Organisme : National Measurement System of the UK's Department for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy
ID : N/A

Investigateurs

Manuel Bardiès (M)
Salvatore Berenato (S)
Ilias Bilas (I)
Christophe Bobin (C)
Marco Capogni (M)
Maxime Chauvin (M)
Sean Collins (S)
Maurice Cox (M)
Jérémie Dabin (J)
Marco D'Arienzo (M)
Johan Gustafsson (J)
Aida Hallam (A)
Theodoros Kalathas (T)
Gunjan Kayal (G)
Giuseppe Lorusso (G)
Franz-Josef Maringer (FJ)
Darren Morgan (D)
Vere Smyth (V)
Jaroslav Šolc (J)
Ludmila Štemberková (L)
Lara Struelens (L)
Alex Vergara-Gil (A)
Hannah Wiedner (H)

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(9):1480-1489
pubmed: 28331954
EJNMMI Phys. 2016 Dec;3(1):12
pubmed: 27411356
J Nucl Med. 2016 Dec;57(12):1998-2005
pubmed: 27445291
J Nucl Med. 2003 Jul;44(7):1113-47
pubmed: 12843230
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jul 21;56(14):R85-112
pubmed: 21701055
Mol Imaging Biol. 2015 Aug;17(4):585-93
pubmed: 25475521
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979 Jun;3(3):299-308
pubmed: 438372
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 Feb 11;7(1):9
pubmed: 32048097
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Aug 7;60(15):6131-49
pubmed: 26215085
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Nov 7;57(21):R119-59
pubmed: 23073343
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 Feb;33(2):125-130
pubmed: 33277151
J Nucl Med. 2020 Aug;61(8):1178-1186
pubmed: 31862802
Z Med Phys. 2006;16(1):47-59
pubmed: 16696370
EJNMMI Phys. 2018 May 2;5(1):8
pubmed: 29717385
Ann Nucl Med. 2012 Jan;26(1):92-8
pubmed: 22033783
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Dec;45(13):2456-2474
pubmed: 30218316
Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:9830386
pubmed: 29312467
J Nucl Med. 2018 Apr;59(4):616-624
pubmed: 29097409
J Nucl Med. 2016 Jan;57(1):151-62
pubmed: 26471692
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 May;38 Suppl 1:S69-77
pubmed: 21484383
J Nucl Med. 2012 Aug;53(8):1310-25
pubmed: 22743252
Phys Med. 2019 Feb;58:40-46
pubmed: 30824148
EJNMMI Phys. 2018 Aug 2;5(1):17
pubmed: 30069805
J Nucl Med. 2004 Jul;45(7):1168-71
pubmed: 15235063
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 Feb 14;7(1):10
pubmed: 32060777
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Nov 21;61(22):7975-7993
pubmed: 27779136
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 May;37(5):1092-1102
pubmed: 29727273
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 May;41 Suppl 1:S17-25
pubmed: 24037503

Auteurs

Johannes Tran-Gia (J)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Tran_J@ukw.de.

Ana M Denis-Bacelar (AM)

National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.

Kelley M Ferreira (KM)

National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.

Andrew P Robinson (AP)

National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Christie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Nicholas Calvert (N)

Christie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Andrew J Fenwick (AJ)

National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Domenico Finocchiaro (D)

Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Federica Fioroni (F)

Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Elisa Grassi (E)

Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Warda Heetun (W)

National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.

Stephanie J Jewitt (SJ)

Radiation Physics and Protection, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Maria Kotzassarlidou (M)

Nuclear Medicine Department, "THEAGENIO" Anticancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Michael Ljungberg (M)

Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Daniel R McGowan (DR)

Radiation Physics and Protection, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nathaniel Scott (N)

Radiation Physics and Protection, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

James Scuffham (J)

National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner (KS)

Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Jill Tipping (J)

Christie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Jill Wevrett (J)

National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

Michael Lassmann (M)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH