Familiarity and task context shape the use of acoustic information in voice identity perception.


Journal

Cognition
ISSN: 1873-7838
Titre abrégé: Cognition
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0367541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
received: 28 07 2020
revised: 10 05 2021
accepted: 12 05 2021
pubmed: 24 7 2021
medline: 21 10 2021
entrez: 23 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Familiar and unfamiliar voice perception are often understood as being distinct from each other. For identity perception, theoretical work has proposed that listeners use acoustic information in different ways to perceive identity from familiar and unfamiliar voices: Unfamiliar voices are thought to be processed based on close comparisons of acoustic properties, while familiar voices are processed based on diagnostic acoustic features that activate a stored person-specific representation of that voice. To date no empirical study has directly examined whether and how familiar and unfamiliar listeners differ in their use of acoustic information for identity perception. Here, we tested this theoretical claim by linking listeners' judgements in voice identity tasks to complex acoustic representation - spectral similarity of the heard voice recordings. Participants (N = 177) who were either familiar or unfamiliar with a set of voices completed an identity discrimination task (Experiment 1) or an identity sorting task (Experiment 2). In both experiments, identity judgements for familiar and unfamiliar voices were guided by spectral similarity: Pairs of recordings with greater acoustic similarity were more likely to be perceived as belonging to the same voice identity. However, while there were no differences in how familiar and unfamiliar listeners used acoustic information for identity discrimination, differences were apparent for identity sorting. Our study therefore challenges proposals that view familiar and unfamiliar voice perception as being at all times distinct. Instead, our data suggest a critical role of the listening situation in which familiar and unfamiliar voices are evaluated, thus characterising voice identity perception as a highly dynamic process in which listeners opportunistically make use of any kind of information they can access.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34298232
pii: S0010-0277(21)00199-2
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104780
pmc: PMC8381763
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104780

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Références

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Dec;145(12):1604-1614
pubmed: 27632378
Psychol Sci. 2013 Oct;24(10):1995-2004
pubmed: 23985575
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Sep;4(9):330-337
pubmed: 10962614
Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(5):829-34
pubmed: 3431677
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013 Aug;66(8):1467-85
pubmed: 23742022
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):388-407
pubmed: 31016684
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Oct;144(4):2178
pubmed: 30404485
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 May;81(4):1108-1118
pubmed: 30993655
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Sep;72(9):2240-2248
pubmed: 30808271
Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2014 Jan 01;6:92-109
pubmed: 24389264
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 31;116(Pt B):162-178
pubmed: 28694095
Psychol Res. 2010 Jan;74(1):110-20
pubmed: 19034504
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 14;8:1584
pubmed: 28959226
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):90-102
pubmed: 29943171
Percept Psychophys. 1998 Apr;60(3):355-76
pubmed: 9599989
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2184-2192
pubmed: 29124718
Br J Psychol. 2019 Aug;110(3):576-593
pubmed: 30221374
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Apr;73(4):519-536
pubmed: 31658884
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Oct;79(7):2064-2072
pubmed: 28695541
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Oct;73(10):1537-1545
pubmed: 32530364

Auteurs

Nadine Lavan (N)

Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: n.lavan@ucl.ac.uk.

Jens Kreitewolf (J)

Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. Electronic address: jens.kreitewolf@mcgill.ca.

Jonas Obleser (J)

Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Center for Brain, Behaviour, and Metabolism, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Carolyn McGettigan (C)

Department of Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH