Concomitant Acute Ischemic Stroke and Upper Extremity Arterial Occlusion: Feasibility of Mechanical Thrombectomy of the Upper Limb Using Neurointerventional Devices and Techniques.
ischemic stroke
large vessel occlusion
mechanical thrombectomy
upper extremity arterial occlusion
upper limb ischemia
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jul 2021
20 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
17
05
2021
revised:
02
07
2021
accepted:
12
07
2021
entrez:
24
7
2021
pubmed:
25
7
2021
medline:
25
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Concomitant acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO), and acute upper extremity arterial occlusion causing upper limb ischemia (ULI) is a rarely observed coincidence. The first-line treatment for AIS is mechanical thrombectomy (MT), with or without additional intravenous thrombolysis, while there are different pharmacological, surgical and endovascular treatment options for an acute occlusion of the UL arteries. Here, we describe the practicability, efficacy and safety of neurointerventional devices and techniques for MT of upper extremity arterial occlusions. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patient databases from four neurovascular centers was performed. Clinical and imaging data, as well as procedural parameters, were assessed. Seven out of 6138 patients (incidence: 0.11%) presenting with an AIS due to the occlusion of craniocervical arteries requiring MT and a concomitant occlusion of the brachial (4/7), axillary (2/7), or ulnar (1/7) artery causing acute ULI were identified. Craniocervical MT was technically successful in all cases. Subsequent MT of the upper limb was performed using neurointerventional thrombectomy techniques, most frequently stent retriever thrombectomy (in 4/7 cases) and direct aspiration (in 7/7 cases). MT achieved successful recanalization in 6/7 cases, and the UL completely recovered in all six cases. In one case, recanalization was not successful, and the patient still had a marginally threatened extremity after the procedure, which improved after pharmacological therapy. In the rare case of AIS requiring MT and concomitant acute upper extremity arterial occlusion, MT of the UL arteries using neurointerventional devices and techniques is practical, effective, and safe.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Concomitant acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO), and acute upper extremity arterial occlusion causing upper limb ischemia (ULI) is a rarely observed coincidence. The first-line treatment for AIS is mechanical thrombectomy (MT), with or without additional intravenous thrombolysis, while there are different pharmacological, surgical and endovascular treatment options for an acute occlusion of the UL arteries. Here, we describe the practicability, efficacy and safety of neurointerventional devices and techniques for MT of upper extremity arterial occlusions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patient databases from four neurovascular centers was performed. Clinical and imaging data, as well as procedural parameters, were assessed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Seven out of 6138 patients (incidence: 0.11%) presenting with an AIS due to the occlusion of craniocervical arteries requiring MT and a concomitant occlusion of the brachial (4/7), axillary (2/7), or ulnar (1/7) artery causing acute ULI were identified. Craniocervical MT was technically successful in all cases. Subsequent MT of the upper limb was performed using neurointerventional thrombectomy techniques, most frequently stent retriever thrombectomy (in 4/7 cases) and direct aspiration (in 7/7 cases). MT achieved successful recanalization in 6/7 cases, and the UL completely recovered in all six cases. In one case, recanalization was not successful, and the patient still had a marginally threatened extremity after the procedure, which improved after pharmacological therapy.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In the rare case of AIS requiring MT and concomitant acute upper extremity arterial occlusion, MT of the UL arteries using neurointerventional devices and techniques is practical, effective, and safe.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34300359
pii: jcm10143189
doi: 10.3390/jcm10143189
pmc: PMC8303877
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Nov;40(5):628-34
pubmed: 20619701
Vasa. 2003 May;32(2):111-6
pubmed: 12945107
Radiol Case Rep. 2017 Dec 19;13(1):183-185
pubmed: 29487654
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 Nov;28(5):508-12
pubmed: 15465372
Clin Neuroradiol. 2018 Sep;28(3):327-338
pubmed: 28194477
Lancet. 2000 May 13;355(9216):1670-4
pubmed: 10905241
JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):443-452
pubmed: 28763550
Vasc Surg. 2001 May-Jun;35(3):181-97
pubmed: 11452344
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001 Jul-Aug;24(4):218-23
pubmed: 11779009
Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41
pubmed: 7678184
Stroke. 2013 Sep;44(9):2650-63
pubmed: 23920012
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998 Dec;45(4):386-93
pubmed: 9863742
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;33(3):477.e3-4
pubmed: 25227978
J Vasc Nurs. 2012 Sep;30(3):71-6
pubmed: 22901445
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Sep;26(3):517-38
pubmed: 9308598
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418
pubmed: 31662037
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Mar;4(1):6-12
pubmed: 31165090