Development of a prediction model for foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes using easy-to-obtain clinical variables.
diabetic foot
foot ulcer
models
statistical
Journal
BMJ open diabetes research & care
ISSN: 2052-4897
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101641391
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
08
03
2021
accepted:
30
06
2021
entrez:
24
7
2021
pubmed:
25
7
2021
medline:
12
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to develop a prediction model for foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes using easy-to-obtain clinical variables and to validate its predictive performance in order to help risk assessment in this high-risk group. We used data from a prospective analysis of 304 people with foot ulcer history who had 18-month follow-up for ulcer outcome. Demographic, disease-related and organization-of-care variables were included as potential predictors. Two logistic regression prediction models were created: model 1 for all recurrent foot ulcers (n=126 events) and model 2 for recurrent plantar foot ulcers (n=70 events). We used 10-fold cross-validation, each including five multiple imputation sets for internal validation. Performance was assessed in terms of discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0-1, 1=perfect discrimination), and calibration with the Brier Score (0-1, 0=complete concordance predicted vs observed values) and calibration graphs. Predictors in model 1 were: a younger age, more severe peripheral sensory neuropathy, fewer months since healing of previous ulcer, presence of a minor lesion, use of a walking aid and not monitoring foot temperatures at home. Mean AUC for model 1 was 0.69 (2SD 0.040) and mean Brier Score was 0.22 (2SD 0.011). Predictors in model 2 were: a younger age, plantar location of previous ulcer, fewer months since healing of previous ulcer, presence of a minor lesion, consumption of alcohol, use of a walking aid, and foot care received in a university medical center. Mean AUC for model 2 was 0.66 (2SD 0.023) and mean Brier Score was 0.16 (2SD 0.0048). These internally validated prediction models predict with reasonable to good calibration and fair discrimination who is at highest risk of ulcer recurrence. The people at highest risk should be monitored more carefully and treated more intensively than others. NTR5403.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34301678
pii: 9/1/e002257
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002257
pmc: PMC8311312
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
NTR
['NTR5403']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Oct;58(4):559-565
pubmed: 30028522
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(57):1-210
pubmed: 26211920
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2367-2375
pubmed: 28614678
Diabetes Care. 1994 Jun;17(6):557-60
pubmed: 8082524
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Oct;28(7):574-600
pubmed: 22730196
Diabet Med. 2020 Aug;37(8):1266-1279
pubmed: 32426872
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36
pubmed: 7063747
Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):2123-9
pubmed: 21868781
Int Wound J. 2013 Oct;10(5):555-61
pubmed: 22712631
Diabetes Care. 1998 Jul;21(7):1071-5
pubmed: 9653597
BMJ. 2009 Feb 23;338:b375
pubmed: 19237405
Lancet. 2014 Jun 7;383(9933):1999-2007
pubmed: 24910231
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3266
pubmed: 32176447
Diabetes Care. 2004 Aug;27(8):1980-4
pubmed: 15277427
Br J Surg. 2015 Feb;102(3):148-58
pubmed: 25627261
Diabet Med. 2018 Nov;35(11):1480-1493
pubmed: 30102422
Diabetes Care. 2020 May;43(5):964-974
pubmed: 32139380
Diabet Med. 2019 Aug;36(8):995-1002
pubmed: 31004370
Diabetes Care. 2013 Dec;36(12):4109-16
pubmed: 24130357
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3269
pubmed: 32176451
Diabetologia. 2011 May;54(5):1190-9
pubmed: 21249490
Stat Med. 1996 Feb 28;15(4):361-87
pubmed: 8668867
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43
pubmed: 11491192
Health Econ. 1993 Oct;2(3):217-27
pubmed: 8275167
Lancet. 2005 Nov 12;366(9498):1719-24
pubmed: 16291066
Diabetologia. 2007 Jan;50(1):18-25
pubmed: 17093942
Am J Med. 2007 Dec;120(12):1042-6
pubmed: 18060924
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004 May-Jun;20 Suppl 1:S23-8
pubmed: 15150809
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S135-S151
pubmed: 31862754
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3234
pubmed: 31944530
Muscle Nerve. 2019 Nov;60(5):520-527
pubmed: 31281987
Trials. 2018 Sep 24;19(1):520
pubmed: 30249296
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004 May-Jun;20 Suppl 1:S90-5
pubmed: 15150820
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;98(2):130-6
pubmed: 18347122
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1697-705
pubmed: 24705610
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Mar;8(1):
pubmed: 32193202
Diabetologia. 2020 Jan;63(1):49-64
pubmed: 31773194
Diabetologia. 2010 Oct;53(10):2241-8
pubmed: 20556354
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:243-250
pubmed: 31610352
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3274
pubmed: 32176441
Diabetologia. 2020 Mar;63(3):659-667
pubmed: 31848633
QJM. 2011 May;104(5):403-10
pubmed: 21186178
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 May;127:105-114
pubmed: 28340359
Diabetes Care. 2007 Aug;30(8):2077-9
pubmed: 17507693
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32 Suppl 1:195-200
pubmed: 26452160