What is the impact of head movement on automated CT perfusion mismatch evaluation in acute ischemic stroke?


Journal

Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 15 03 2021
accepted: 04 07 2021
pubmed: 25 7 2021
medline: 18 5 2022
entrez: 24 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Automated CT perfusion mismatch assessment is an established treatment decision tool in acute ischemic stroke. However, the reliability of this method in patients with head motion is unclear. We therefore sought to evaluate the influence of head movement on automated CT perfusion mismatch evaluation. Using a realistic CT brain-perfusion-phantom, 7 perfusion mismatch scenarios were simulated within the left middle cerebral artery territory. Real CT noise and artificial head movement were added. Thereafter, ischemic core, penumbra volumes and mismatch ratios were evaluated using an automated mismatch analysis software (RAPID, iSchemaView) and compared with ground truth simulated values. While CT scanner noise alone had only a minor impact on mismatch evaluation, a tendency towards smaller infarct core estimates (mean difference of -5.3 (-14 to 3.5) mL for subtle head movement and -7.0 (-14.7 to 0.7) mL for strong head movement), larger penumbral estimates (+9.9 (-25 to 44) mL and +35 (-14 to 85) mL, respectively) and consequently larger mismatch ratios (+0.8 (-1.5 to 3.0) for subtle head movement and +1.9 (-1.3 to 5.1) for strong head movement) were noted in dependence of patient head movement. Motion during CT perfusion acquisition influences automated mismatch evaluation. Potentially treatment-relevant changes in mismatch classifications in dependence of head movement were observed and occurred in favor of mechanical thrombectomy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34301804
pii: neurintsurg-2021-017510
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017510
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

628-633

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Arne Potreck (A)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany arne.potreck@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Fatih Seker (F)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Matthias Anthony Mutke (MA)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Charlotte Sabine Weyland (CS)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Christian Herweh (C)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Sabine Heiland (S)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Martin Bendszus (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Markus Möhlenbruch (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH