Design and validation of a modular micro-robotic system for the mechanical characterization of soft tissues.
Embryonic tendon
Extracellular matrix
Soft tissue mechanics
Tendon mechanics
Tensile testing
Journal
Acta biomaterialia
ISSN: 1878-7568
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomater
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233144
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 10 2021
15 10 2021
Historique:
received:
07
01
2021
revised:
14
07
2021
accepted:
15
07
2021
pubmed:
25
7
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
entrez:
24
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The mechanical properties of tissues are critical design parameters for biomaterials and regenerative therapies seeking to restore functionality after disease or injury. Characterizing the mechanical properties of native tissues and extracellular matrix throughout embryonic development helps us understand the microenvironments that promote growth and remodeling, activities critical for biomaterials to support. The mechanical characterization of small, soft materials like the embryonic tissues of the mouse, an established mammalian model for development, is challenging due to difficulties in handling minute geometries and resolving forces of low magnitude. While uniaxial tensile testing is the physiologically relevant modality to characterize tissues that are loaded in tension in vivo, there are no commercially available instruments that can simultaneously measure sufficiently low tensile force magnitudes, directly measure sample deformation, keep samples hydrated throughout testing, and effectively grip minute geometries to test small tissues. To address this gap, we developed a micromanipulator and spring system that can mechanically characterize small, soft materials under tension. We demonstrate the capability of this system to measure the force contribution of soft materials, silicone, fibronectin sheets, and fibrin gels with a 5 nN - 50 µN force resolution and perform a variety of mechanical tests. Additionally, we investigated murine embryonic tendon mechanics, demonstrating the instrument can measure differences in mechanics of small, soft tissues as a function of developmental stage. This system can be further utilized to mechanically characterize soft biomaterials and small tissues and provide physiologically relevant parameters for designing scaffolds that seek to emulate native tissue mechanics. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The mechanical properties of cellular microenvironments are critical parameters that contribute to the modulation of tissue growth and remodeling. The field of tissue engineering endeavors to recapitulate these microenvironments in order to construct tissues de novo. Therefore, it is crucial to uncover the mechanical properties of the cellular microenvironment during tissue formation. Here, we present a system capable of acquiring microscale forces and optically measuring sample deformation to calculate the stress-strain response of soft, embryonic tissues under tension, and easily adaptable to accommodate biomaterials of various sizes and stiffnesses. Altogether, this modular system enables researchers to probe the unknown mechanical properties of soft tissues throughout development to inform the engineering of physiologically relevant microenvironments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34303012
pii: S1742-7061(21)00473-6
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.035
pmc: PMC8542608
mid: NIHMS1728565
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
466-476Subventions
Organisme : NCCIH NIH HHS
ID : DP2 AT009833
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR071359
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Mol Cancer Res. 2018 Oct;16(10):1579-1589
pubmed: 29934326
J Cell Sci. 2002 Oct 15;115(Pt 20):3861-3
pubmed: 12244123
Matrix Biol. 2017 Jul;60-61:110-123
pubmed: 27553509
Dev Dyn. 2011 Nov;240(11):2520-8
pubmed: 22012594
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2019 Sep;10(3):500-507
pubmed: 31098919
Exp Mech. 2019 Nov;59(9):1307-1321
pubmed: 31762478
Biomaterials. 2011 Apr;32(12):3233-43
pubmed: 21296410
Dev Biol. 2018 Mar 15;435(2):122-129
pubmed: 29352963
Exp Cell Res. 2016 Apr 10;343(1):60-66
pubmed: 26524505
Science. 2005 Nov 18;310(5751):1139-43
pubmed: 16293750
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Aug 04;17(8):
pubmed: 28777341
Biophys J. 2013 Nov 19;105(10):2240-51
pubmed: 24268136
J Biol Chem. 2006 Mar 24;281(12):8016-23
pubmed: 16407178
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013 Oct;24(5):834-40
pubmed: 23916867
Dev Dyn. 1997 Mar;208(3):291-8
pubmed: 9056634
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Dec;15(12):771-85
pubmed: 25370693
Circ Res. 2009 May 22;104(10):1217-24
pubmed: 19372465
J Biomech. 2014 Jun 27;47(9):1964-8
pubmed: 24484642
Lab Chip. 2019 Mar 27;19(7):1153-1161
pubmed: 30776038
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2020 Jul;19(7):1220-1235
pubmed: 32381549
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Nov;99:118-126
pubmed: 31351401
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Oct;111(4):999-1006
pubmed: 21737825
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Dec;15(12):786-801
pubmed: 25415508
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 24;373(1759):
pubmed: 30249775
J Cell Sci. 2008 Feb 1;121(Pt 3):255-64
pubmed: 18216330
Acta Biomater. 2019 Apr 1;88:78-85
pubmed: 30780000
Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 15;84:169-179
pubmed: 30508655
J Biomech. 1987;20(1):59-65
pubmed: 3558429
Thromb Res. 1983 Feb 1;29(3):269-80
pubmed: 6845281
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Mar;103:103503
pubmed: 32090940
Biomaterials. 2017 Aug;136:86-97
pubmed: 28521203
Matrix Biol. 2013 Mar 11;32(2):106-16
pubmed: 23357642
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 16;110(16):6370-5
pubmed: 23576745
Biomaterials. 2007 Jan;28(1):55-65
pubmed: 16962167
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Apr;108(4):875-81
pubmed: 20110546
Development. 2015 Dec 15;142(24):4191-204
pubmed: 26672092
Acta Biomater. 2019 Aug;94:514-523
pubmed: 31152942
Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2008 Sep;84(3):228-44
pubmed: 18773462
Ann Biomed Eng. 2011 Jul;39(7):1904-13
pubmed: 21431455
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Oct;14(10):733-44
pubmed: 24045690
Adv Mater. 2019 Nov;31(46):e1904580
pubmed: 31565823
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Oct;101(4):1113-7
pubmed: 16728516
Acta Biomater. 2018 Apr 1;70:270-280
pubmed: 29447959
J Biomech Eng. 2021 Jan 1;143(1):
pubmed: 33006367
J Orthop Res. 2017 Jul;35(7):1353-1365
pubmed: 27878999
Development. 2007 Jul;134(14):2697-708
pubmed: 17567668
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 12;6:24272
pubmed: 27067516
EMBO Rep. 2014 Dec;15(12):1243-53
pubmed: 25381661
Acta Biomater. 2018 Sep 15;78:308-319
pubmed: 30059802
Adv Mater. 2018 Apr;30(14):e1707196
pubmed: 29484715
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013 Oct;24(5):830-3
pubmed: 23726156
J R Soc Interface. 2009 Jan 6;6(30):1-10
pubmed: 18801715