Quantitative evaluation of deep convolutional neural network-based image denoising for low-dose computed tomography.

Convolutional neural network Deep learning Denoising Image quality Low-dose computed tomography

Journal

Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art
ISSN: 2524-4442
Titre abrégé: Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101759975

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 31 03 2021
accepted: 10 06 2021
entrez: 25 7 2021
pubmed: 26 7 2021
medline: 26 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To minimize radiation risk, dose reduction is important in the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of computed tomography (CT). However, image noise degrades image quality owing to the reduced X-ray dose and a possible unacceptably reduced diagnostic performance. Deep learning approaches with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been proposed for natural image denoising; however, these approaches might introduce image blurring or loss of original gradients. The aim of this study was to compare the dose-dependent properties of a CNN-based denoising method for low-dose CT with those of other noise-reduction methods on unique CT noise-simulation images. To simulate a low-dose CT image, a Poisson noise distribution was introduced to normal-dose images while convoluting the CT unit-specific modulation transfer function. An abdominal CT of 100 images obtained from a public database was adopted, and simulated dose-reduction images were created from the original dose at equal 10-step dose-reduction intervals with a final dose of 1/100. These images were denoised using the denoising network structure of CNN (DnCNN) as the general CNN model and for transfer learning. To evaluate the image quality, image similarities determined by the structural similarity index (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) were calculated for the denoised images. Significantly better denoising, in terms of SSIM and PSNR, was achieved by the DnCNN than by other image denoising methods, especially at the ultra-low-dose levels used to generate the 10% and 5% dose-equivalent images. Moreover, the developed CNN model can eliminate noise and maintain image sharpness at these dose levels and improve SSIM by approximately 10% from that of the original method. In contrast, under small dose-reduction conditions, this model also led to excessive smoothing of the images. In quantitative evaluations, the CNN denoising method improved the low-dose CT and prevented over-smoothing by tailoring the CNN model.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34304321
doi: 10.1186/s42492-021-00087-9
pii: 10.1186/s42492-021-00087-9
pmc: PMC8310822
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

21

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409
pubmed: 21714641
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Dec;36(12):2536-2545
pubmed: 28574346
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1045-57
pubmed: 23884657
Front Neurosci. 2018 Nov 15;12:804
pubmed: 30498429
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84
pubmed: 18046031
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Apr;187:104964
pubmed: 31262537
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 26;15(8):e0235672
pubmed: 32845877
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2020 Nov;30(4):493-503
pubmed: 33038999
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 13;14(9):e0222406
pubmed: 31518374
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017 Jul;26(7):3142-3155
pubmed: 28166495
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004 Apr;13(4):600-12
pubmed: 15376593
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Oct;25(10):1272-83
pubmed: 17024831
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Dec;199(6):1266-74
pubmed: 23169718
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul;195(1):78-88
pubmed: 20566800
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Dec;36(12):2524-2535
pubmed: 28622671
Neural Netw. 2020 Nov;131:251-275
pubmed: 32829002
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):3906-3923
pubmed: 31306488
Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Jan 09;8(2):679-694
pubmed: 28270976
Med Phys. 2014 Jan;41(1):011901
pubmed: 24387509
J Med Syst. 2019 Jun 15;43(8):234
pubmed: 31203556
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):3941-3950
pubmed: 31220358
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Sep 21;56(18):5949-67
pubmed: 21860076

Auteurs

Keisuke Usui (K)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan. k-usui@juntendo.ac.jp.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan. k-usui@juntendo.ac.jp.

Koichi Ogawa (K)

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, Tokyo, 184-8584, Japan.

Masami Goto (M)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.

Yasuaki Sakano (Y)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.

Shinsuke Kyougoku (S)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.

Hiroyuki Daida (H)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.

Classifications MeSH