Regional Deprivation, Stroke Incidence, and Stroke Care—An Analysis of Billing and Quality Assurance Data From the German State of Rhineland-Palatinate.
Journal
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
ISSN: 1866-0452
Titre abrégé: Dtsch Arztebl Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101475967
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 06 2021
11 06 2021
Historique:
received:
07
12
2020
revised:
07
12
2020
accepted:
04
02
2021
entrez:
26
7
2021
pubmed:
27
7
2021
medline:
7
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Regional deprivation can increase the risk of illness and adversely affect care outcomes. In this study, we investigated for the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate whether spatial-structural disadvantages are associated with an increased frequency of ischemic stroke and with less favorable care outcomes. We compared billing data from DRG statistics (2008-2017) and quality assurance data (2017) for acute ischemic stroke with the German Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010 (GIMD 2010) for the 36 districts (Landkreise) and independent cities (i.e., cities not belonging to a district) in Rhineland-Palatinate using correlation analyses, a Poisson regression analysis, and logistic regression analyses. The age-standardized stroke rates (ASR) ranged from 122 to 209 per 100 000 inhabitants, while the GIMD 2010 ranged from 4.6 to 47.5; the two values were positively correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.47; 95% confidence interval [0.16; 0.85]). In 2017, mechanical thrombectomies were performed more commonly (5.7%) in the first GIMD 2010 quartile of the regional areas (i.e., in the least deprived areas) than in the remaining quartiles (4.2-4.6%). The intravenous thrombolysis rates showed no differences from one GIMD 2010 quartile to another. Severe neurological deficits (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 5) on admission to the hospital were slightly more common in the fourth quartile (i.e., in the most deprived areas), while antiplatelet drugs and statins were somewhat less commonly ordered on discharge in those areas than in the first quartile. These findings document a relationship between regional deprivation and the occurrence of acute ischemic stroke. Poorer GIMD 2010 scores were associated with worse care outcomes in a number of variables, but the absolute differences were small.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Regional deprivation can increase the risk of illness and adversely affect care outcomes. In this study, we investigated for the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate whether spatial-structural disadvantages are associated with an increased frequency of ischemic stroke and with less favorable care outcomes.
METHODS
We compared billing data from DRG statistics (2008-2017) and quality assurance data (2017) for acute ischemic stroke with the German Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010 (GIMD 2010) for the 36 districts (Landkreise) and independent cities (i.e., cities not belonging to a district) in Rhineland-Palatinate using correlation analyses, a Poisson regression analysis, and logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS
The age-standardized stroke rates (ASR) ranged from 122 to 209 per 100 000 inhabitants, while the GIMD 2010 ranged from 4.6 to 47.5; the two values were positively correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.47; 95% confidence interval [0.16; 0.85]). In 2017, mechanical thrombectomies were performed more commonly (5.7%) in the first GIMD 2010 quartile of the regional areas (i.e., in the least deprived areas) than in the remaining quartiles (4.2-4.6%). The intravenous thrombolysis rates showed no differences from one GIMD 2010 quartile to another. Severe neurological deficits (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 5) on admission to the hospital were slightly more common in the fourth quartile (i.e., in the most deprived areas), while antiplatelet drugs and statins were somewhat less commonly ordered on discharge in those areas than in the first quartile.
CONCLUSION
These findings document a relationship between regional deprivation and the occurrence of acute ischemic stroke. Poorer GIMD 2010 scores were associated with worse care outcomes in a number of variables, but the absolute differences were small.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34304754
pii: arztebl.m2021.0149
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0149
pmc: PMC8378257
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
397-402Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Jan;78(1):42-8
pubmed: 25706042
Stroke. 2016 Jan;47(1):173-9
pubmed: 26604249
Eur J Neurol. 2017 May;24(5):694-702
pubmed: 28236340
Epidemiology. 2017 Jul;28(4):608-618
pubmed: 28410350
Neurology. 2012 Sep 18;79(12):1200-7
pubmed: 22895592
Stroke. 2015 Aug;46(8):2220-5
pubmed: 26081841
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e028553
pubmed: 31455703
Med J Aust. 2011 Jul 4;195(1):10-4
pubmed: 21728934
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Dec;14(12):1206-18
pubmed: 26581971
Health Econ. 2015 Nov;24(11):1523-30
pubmed: 25294413
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 27;9(2):e89661
pubmed: 24586945
Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1201-6
pubmed: 21393599
Stroke. 2011 Oct;42(10):2896-902
pubmed: 21817140
Stroke. 2010 Sep;41(9):1865-70
pubmed: 20689086
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Dec;60(12):1403-1412
pubmed: 29119206
Stroke. 2010 Jul;41(7):1495-500
pubmed: 20522811
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Jul;74(7):416-25
pubmed: 22020751
Neurol Res Pract. 2019 Mar 15;1:8
pubmed: 33324874
Diabet Med. 2013 Mar;30(3):e78-86
pubmed: 23127142
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):245-54
pubmed: 24449944
Stroke. 2014 Sep;45(9):2762-8
pubmed: 25074515
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Apr;3(4):e185-e193
pubmed: 29550372
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jul 16;3(4):
pubmed: 25030354