Technical note: Impact of face covering on aerosol transport patterns during coughing and sneezing.
Aerosol transmission
COVID-19
Coughing
Facemask
Sneezing
Journal
Journal of aerosol science
ISSN: 0021-8502
Titre abrégé: J Aerosol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1263115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
28
05
2021
revised:
10
07
2021
accepted:
12
07
2021
entrez:
26
7
2021
pubmed:
27
7
2021
medline:
27
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
COVID-19 is spread via different routes, including virus-laden airborne particles generated by human respiratory activities. In addition to large droplets, coughing and sneezing produce a lot of small aerosol particles. While face coverings are believed to reduce the aerosol transmission, information about their outward effectiveness is limited. Here, we determined the aerosol concentration patterns around a coughing and sneezing manikin and established spatial zones representing specific elevations of the aerosol concentration relative to the background. Real-time measurements of sub-micrometer aerosol particles were performed in the vicinity of the manikin. The tests were carried out without any face covering and with three different types of face covers: a safety faceshield, low-efficiency facemask and high-efficiency surgical mask. With no face covering, the simulated coughing and sneezing created a powerful forward-propagating fine aerosol flow. At 6 ft forward from the manikin head, the aerosol concentration was still 20-fold above the background. Adding a face covering reconfigured the forward-directed aerosol transmission pattern. The tested face coverings were found capable of mitigating the risk of coronavirus transmission; their effectiveness is dependent on the protective device. The outward leakage associated with a specific face covering was shown to be a major determinant of the exposure level for a person standing or seating next to or behind the coughing or sneezing "spreader" in a bus/train/aircraft/auditorium setting. Along with reports recently published in the literature, the study findings help assess the infectious dose and ultimately health risk for persons located within a 6-ft radius around the "spreader."
Identifiants
pubmed: 34305164
doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105847
pii: S0021-8502(21)00578-4
pmc: PMC8279921
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
105847Informations de copyright
© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 18;72(10):e652-e654
pubmed: 32857833
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 3;71(9):2311-2313
pubmed: 32628269
Aerosol Sci Technol. 2021 Jun 14;55(10):1125-1142
pubmed: 35923216
Indoor Air. 2009 Dec;19(6):517-25
pubmed: 19840145
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 24;10(1):15665
pubmed: 32973285
Aerosol Sci Technol. 2021 Jan 7;55(4):449-457
pubmed: 35924077
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4):
pubmed: 33431650
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 18;72(10):e639-e641
pubmed: 32945338
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):998-999
pubmed: 33566056
J R Soc Interface. 2013 Sep 11;10(88):20130560
pubmed: 24026469
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(7):443-9
pubmed: 22651099
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59970
pubmed: 23560060
Environ Int. 2020 Jun;139:105730
pubmed: 32294574
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):676-680
pubmed: 32371934
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016 Jul;13(7):569-76
pubmed: 26225807
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Apr;129(4):47002
pubmed: 33793301