Real Life Clinical Management and Survival in Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma: The Italian Clinical National Melanoma Registry Experience.
cutaneous melanoma
immunotherapy
ipilimumab
medical record systems
survival analysis
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
04
03
2021
accepted:
22
06
2021
entrez:
26
7
2021
pubmed:
27
7
2021
medline:
27
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is one of the most aggressive types of skin cancer. Currently, innovative approaches such as target therapies and immunotherapies have been introduced in clinical practice. Data of clinical trials and real life studies that evaluate the outcomes of these therapeutic associations are necessary to establish their clinical utility. The aim of this study is to investigate the types of oncological treatments employed in the real-life clinical management of patients with advanced CM in several Italian centers, which are part of the Clinical National Melanoma Registry (CNMR). Melanoma-specific survival and overall survival were calculated. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios adjusting for confounders and other prognostic factors. The median follow-up time was 36 months (range 1.2-185.1). 787 CM were included in the analysis with completed information about therapies. All types of immunotherapy showed a significant improved survival compared with all other therapies (p=0.001). 75% was the highest reduction of death reached by anti-PD-1 (HR=0.25), globally immunotherapy was significantly associated with improved survival, either for anti-CTLA4 monotherapy or combined with anti-PD-1 (HR=0.47 and 0.26, respectively) and BRAFI+MEKI (HR=0.62). The nivolumab/pembrolizumab in combination of ipilimumab and the addition of ant-MEK to the BRAFi can be considered the best therapies to improve survival in a real-world-population. The CNMR can complement clinical registries with the intent of improving cancer management and standardizing cancer treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is one of the most aggressive types of skin cancer. Currently, innovative approaches such as target therapies and immunotherapies have been introduced in clinical practice. Data of clinical trials and real life studies that evaluate the outcomes of these therapeutic associations are necessary to establish their clinical utility. The aim of this study is to investigate the types of oncological treatments employed in the real-life clinical management of patients with advanced CM in several Italian centers, which are part of the Clinical National Melanoma Registry (CNMR).
METHODS
METHODS
Melanoma-specific survival and overall survival were calculated. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios adjusting for confounders and other prognostic factors.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The median follow-up time was 36 months (range 1.2-185.1). 787 CM were included in the analysis with completed information about therapies. All types of immunotherapy showed a significant improved survival compared with all other therapies (p=0.001). 75% was the highest reduction of death reached by anti-PD-1 (HR=0.25), globally immunotherapy was significantly associated with improved survival, either for anti-CTLA4 monotherapy or combined with anti-PD-1 (HR=0.47 and 0.26, respectively) and BRAFI+MEKI (HR=0.62).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The nivolumab/pembrolizumab in combination of ipilimumab and the addition of ant-MEK to the BRAFi can be considered the best therapies to improve survival in a real-world-population. The CNMR can complement clinical registries with the intent of improving cancer management and standardizing cancer treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34307142
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.672797
pmc: PMC8298066
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
672797Investigateurs
Maddalena Cespa
(M)
Rosachiara Forcignanò
(R)
Gianmichele Moise
(G)
Maria Concetta Fargnoli
(MC)
Caterina Ferreli
(C)
Maria Grimaldi
(M)
Guido Zannetti
(G)
Saverio Cinieri
(S)
Giusto Trevisan
(G)
Ignazio Stanganelli
(I)
Giovanna Moretti
(G)
Francesca Bruder
(F)
Luca Bianchi
(L)
Maria Teresa Fierro
(MT)
Luigi Mascheroni
(L)
Salvatore Asero
(S)
Caterina Catricalà
(C)
Stefania Staibano
(S)
Gaetana Rinaldi
(G)
Riccardo Pellicano
(R)
Laura Milesi
(L)
Marilena Visini
(M)
Franco Di Filippo
(F)
Leonardo Zichichi
(L)
Maria Antonietta Pizzichetta
(MA)
Carmelo Iacono
(C)
Massimo Guidoboni
(M)
Giovanni Sanna
(G)
Michele Maio
(M)
Lucia Lospalluti
(L)
Rosanna Barbati
(R)
Leonardi Vita
(L)
Annamaria Pollio
(A)
Carlo Riberti
(C)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Crispo, Corradin, Giulioni, Vecchiato, Del Fiore, Queirolo, Spagnolo, Vanella, Caracò, Tosti, Pennacchioli, Giudice, Nacchiero, Quaglino, Ribero, Giordano, Marussi, Barruscotti, Guida, De Giorgi, Occelli, Grosso, Cairo, Gatti, Massa, Atzori, Calvani, Fabrizio, Mastrangelo, Toffolutti, Celentano, Budroni, Gandini, Rossi, Testori, Palmieri, Ascierto and the Clinical National Melanoma Registry Study Group at the Italian Melanoma Intergroup.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
PA has/had a consultant/advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Array, Merck Serono, Pierre-Fabre, Incyte, Medimmune, AstraZeneca, Syndax, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Idera, Ultimovacs, Sandoz, Immunocore, 4SC, Alkermes, Italfarmaco, Nektar, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo, Oncosec, Pfizer. He also received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Array and travel support from MSD. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Oncol Lett. 2016 Apr;11(4):2706-2714
pubmed: 27073541
J Transl Med. 2013 Mar 08;11:61
pubmed: 23497384
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):626-636
pubmed: 31166680
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23
pubmed: 20525992
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(13):2046-53
pubmed: 22342554
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2507-16
pubmed: 21639808
Clin Dermatol. 2009 Jan-Feb;27(1):3-9
pubmed: 19095149
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:564-571
pubmed: 31099689
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;33(17):1889-94
pubmed: 25667295
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Feb;72:156-165
pubmed: 28030784
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862
pubmed: 28822576
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2443-54
pubmed: 22658127
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
Front Oncol. 2015 Aug 10;5:183
pubmed: 26322273
Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):611-622
pubmed: 28359784
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(28):e16328
pubmed: 31305421
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1535-1546
pubmed: 31562797
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017 May;26(3):263-267
pubmed: 26999380
Int J Cancer. 2003 Oct 20;107(1):119-26
pubmed: 12925966
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(7):1631-1639
pubmed: 28475671
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Oct;51(15):2179-2190
pubmed: 26421821
Lancet. 2012 Jul 28;380(9839):358-65
pubmed: 22735384
Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 3;9(9):8531-8541
pubmed: 29492214
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 13;371(20):1867-76
pubmed: 25265494