A Qualitative Study of Perceived Risk of Occupational Exposure to HIV and Use of Post Exposure Prophylaxis Services Among Health-Care Workers in Tanzania.
Journal
The East African health research journal
ISSN: 2520-5285
Titre abrégé: East Afr Health Res J
Pays: Burundi
ID NLM: 101713200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
19
10
2018
accepted:
26
08
2019
entrez:
26
7
2021
pubmed:
1
1
2019
medline:
1
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Occupational exposure to HIV continues to present a risk of HIV infections to health-care workers (HCWs) in low-income countries. Since 2005, policies in Tanzania have been in place to guide the implementation of HIV/AIDS post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) interventions in the workplace. However, little is known about how frontline HCWs experience and view these interventions. This study aimed to explore how HCWs perceive their HIV infection risk and capture their experiences of workplace HIV/AIDS interventions. A descriptive qualitative design was used. Medical and nonmedical personnel from 2 hospitals in the Pwani and Dodoma regions of Tanzania participated in the study. We conducted 22 In-depth interviews (IDIs) with HCWs (heads of departments, hospital units, or sections). A content analysis approach was used. The HCWs perceived and reasoned that working in medical wards, incinerator units, dental units, obstetric wards, laundries, laboratories, and mortuaries exposed them to HIV acquisition risk. Many of the medically trained personnel reported that invasive procedures exposed them to some risk of HIV infection. Nonmedical personnel reported to be potentially exposed to HIV infection while incorrectly handling discarded needles and blades (sharps). Although most HCWs expressed awareness about the availability of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), not all HCWs knew where to report and whom to contact in case of accidents. Ignorance about the implications of exposure to contaminated sharps hindered PEP use among certain cadres. Also, some PEP users were reported to experience side effects, but they were motivated to complete the doses to remain healthy. Occupational exposure to HIV infection remains a significant concern to HCWs, particularly among nonmedical cadres. Despite expressed awareness about infection prevention and control, the reporting channels and the strategies to promote recognition of the importance of using PEP services after exposure need to be strengthened.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Occupational exposure to HIV continues to present a risk of HIV infections to health-care workers (HCWs) in low-income countries. Since 2005, policies in Tanzania have been in place to guide the implementation of HIV/AIDS post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) interventions in the workplace. However, little is known about how frontline HCWs experience and view these interventions. This study aimed to explore how HCWs perceive their HIV infection risk and capture their experiences of workplace HIV/AIDS interventions.
METHODS
METHODS
A descriptive qualitative design was used. Medical and nonmedical personnel from 2 hospitals in the Pwani and Dodoma regions of Tanzania participated in the study. We conducted 22 In-depth interviews (IDIs) with HCWs (heads of departments, hospital units, or sections). A content analysis approach was used.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The HCWs perceived and reasoned that working in medical wards, incinerator units, dental units, obstetric wards, laundries, laboratories, and mortuaries exposed them to HIV acquisition risk. Many of the medically trained personnel reported that invasive procedures exposed them to some risk of HIV infection. Nonmedical personnel reported to be potentially exposed to HIV infection while incorrectly handling discarded needles and blades (sharps). Although most HCWs expressed awareness about the availability of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), not all HCWs knew where to report and whom to contact in case of accidents. Ignorance about the implications of exposure to contaminated sharps hindered PEP use among certain cadres. Also, some PEP users were reported to experience side effects, but they were motivated to complete the doses to remain healthy.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Occupational exposure to HIV infection remains a significant concern to HCWs, particularly among nonmedical cadres. Despite expressed awareness about infection prevention and control, the reporting channels and the strategies to promote recognition of the importance of using PEP services after exposure need to be strengthened.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34308202
doi: 10.24248/EAHRJ-D-19-00018
pii: EAHRJ-D-19-00018
pmc: PMC8279300
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
96-104Informations de copyright
© The East African Health Research Commission 2019.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing Interests: None declared.
Références
Am J Infect Control. 2005 Feb;33(1):34-41
pubmed: 15685133
Int Nurs Rev. 2011 Dec;58(4):454-62
pubmed: 22092324
Lancet. 2000 Feb 26;355(9205):722-3
pubmed: 10703807
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Feb;166(2):263-7
pubmed: 8553928
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Dec 29;5:704
pubmed: 23273066
SAHARA J. 2012;9(1):1-5
pubmed: 23237015
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;28(1):10-7
pubmed: 17230382
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Jan 9;63(53):1245-6
pubmed: 25577991
Pan Afr Med J. 2013;14:10
pubmed: 23504245
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 25;13:508
pubmed: 23705668
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2004 Oct-Dec;10(4):451-6
pubmed: 15702761
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Nov;19(21-22):3227-34
pubmed: 21040024
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 30;13:369
pubmed: 24079806
Adv Prev Med. 2014;2014:296148
pubmed: 24987531
N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 20;337(21):1485-90
pubmed: 9366579
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 15;113(10):740-6
pubmed: 2240876
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;28(6):695-701
pubmed: 17520543
Am J Ind Med. 2005 Dec;48(6):482-90
pubmed: 16299710
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Dec 10;167(22):2524-6
pubmed: 18071177
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2010 Mar;20(1):55-64
pubmed: 22434961
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 28;356(26):2693-9
pubmed: 17596603