Prevalence and changes in food-related hardships by socioeconomic and demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A longitudinal panel study.

COVID-19 Food insecurity Food-related hardships Furlough Job Retention Scheme Lockdown measures

Journal

The Lancet regional health. Europe
ISSN: 2666-7762
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health Eur
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101777707

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
entrez: 26 7 2021
pubmed: 27 7 2021
medline: 27 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Food insecurity concerns have featured prominently in the UK response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We assess changes in the prevalence of food-related hardships in the UK population from April to July 2020. We analysed longitudinal data on food-related hardships for 11,104 respondents from the April-July 2020 waves of the Understanding Society COVID-19 web survey with linked data from the 2017-9 wave of the annual Understanding Society survey. Outcome variables were reports of being hungry but not eating and of being unable to eat healthy and nutritious food in the last week, which were adapted from the Food Insecurity Experience Scale. We used unadjusted estimates to examine changes in population prevalence and logistic regression to assess the association between employment transitions and both outcomes at the individual level. The prevalence of reporting an inability to eat healthy or nutritious food rose from 3•2% in April to 16•3% in July 2020. The largest increases in being unable to eat healthy or nutritious food were among Asian respondents, the self-employed, and 35-44-year-olds. The prevalence of being hungry but not eating rose from 3•3% in April to 5•1% in July, with the largest increases observed among unemployed individuals below age 65. Those moving from employment to unemployment had higher odds of being hungry but not eating in the last week relative to furloughed individuals (OR = 2•2; p < 0•05; 95% CI: 1•1 to 4•2) and to the persistently employed (OR = 3•5; p < 0•001; 95% CI: 1•8 to 6•9), adjusting for age, highest qualification in 2017-19, net household income in 2017-19 (equivalized), gender, race/ethnicity, number children at home (aged 0-4, 5-15, and 16-18), cohabitation status, and government office region. Respondents moving from employment to unemployment also had higher odds of reporting an inability to eat healthy and nutritious food relative to furloughed individuals (OR = 1•9; p < 0•05; 95% CI: 1•4 to 3•2) and to the persistently employed (OR = 2•0; p < 0•01; 95% CI: 1•2 to 3•4). No statistically significant differences were found between furloughed individuals and the persistently employed in their probability of reporting either outcome. Food-related hardships increased substantially in the UK between April and July 2020, largely driven by reports of an inability to eat healthy and nutritious food. The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and Self-Employment Income Support Scheme appeared to have conferred some protection, but more could have been done to mitigate the problems we describe in obtaining affordable food. DS is funded by the Wellcome Trust investigator award. JK and DS are funded by the European Research Council n. 313590 - HRES. VT is funded by the European Research Council n. 694145- IFAMID.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Food insecurity concerns have featured prominently in the UK response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We assess changes in the prevalence of food-related hardships in the UK population from April to July 2020.
METHOD METHODS
We analysed longitudinal data on food-related hardships for 11,104 respondents from the April-July 2020 waves of the Understanding Society COVID-19 web survey with linked data from the 2017-9 wave of the annual Understanding Society survey. Outcome variables were reports of being hungry but not eating and of being unable to eat healthy and nutritious food in the last week, which were adapted from the Food Insecurity Experience Scale. We used unadjusted estimates to examine changes in population prevalence and logistic regression to assess the association between employment transitions and both outcomes at the individual level.
FINDINGS RESULTS
The prevalence of reporting an inability to eat healthy or nutritious food rose from 3•2% in April to 16•3% in July 2020. The largest increases in being unable to eat healthy or nutritious food were among Asian respondents, the self-employed, and 35-44-year-olds. The prevalence of being hungry but not eating rose from 3•3% in April to 5•1% in July, with the largest increases observed among unemployed individuals below age 65. Those moving from employment to unemployment had higher odds of being hungry but not eating in the last week relative to furloughed individuals (OR = 2•2; p < 0•05; 95% CI: 1•1 to 4•2) and to the persistently employed (OR = 3•5; p < 0•001; 95% CI: 1•8 to 6•9), adjusting for age, highest qualification in 2017-19, net household income in 2017-19 (equivalized), gender, race/ethnicity, number children at home (aged 0-4, 5-15, and 16-18), cohabitation status, and government office region. Respondents moving from employment to unemployment also had higher odds of reporting an inability to eat healthy and nutritious food relative to furloughed individuals (OR = 1•9; p < 0•05; 95% CI: 1•4 to 3•2) and to the persistently employed (OR = 2•0; p < 0•01; 95% CI: 1•2 to 3•4). No statistically significant differences were found between furloughed individuals and the persistently employed in their probability of reporting either outcome.
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
Food-related hardships increased substantially in the UK between April and July 2020, largely driven by reports of an inability to eat healthy and nutritious food. The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and Self-Employment Income Support Scheme appeared to have conferred some protection, but more could have been done to mitigate the problems we describe in obtaining affordable food.
FUNDING BACKGROUND
DS is funded by the Wellcome Trust investigator award. JK and DS are funded by the European Research Council n. 313590 - HRES. VT is funded by the European Research Council n. 694145- IFAMID.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34308408
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100125
pii: S2666-7762(21)00102-2
pmc: PMC8291709
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100125

Subventions

Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 313590
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None to declare. All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf. DS and JK are supported by the the European Research Council 313590 - HRES. DS is also supported by the Wellcome Trust investigator award. VT is funded by the European Research Council, 694145- IFAMID.

Références

Prev Med. 2016 Aug;89:44-50
pubmed: 27212071
BMJ. 2020 Aug 6;370:m3085
pubmed: 32764108
BMJ. 2020 Apr 27;369:m1557
pubmed: 32341002
Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2020 Oct 02;:
pubmed: 33042510
BMJ. 2015 Apr 08;350:h1775
pubmed: 25854525
Public Health. 2020 Oct;187:161-164
pubmed: 32980783
Arch Public Health. 2017 Mar 3;75:13
pubmed: 28270912

Auteurs

Jonathan Koltai (J)

Sociology Department, University of New Hampshire, Durham, USA.

Veronica Toffolutti (V)

Centre for Health Economics & Policy Innovation and Department of Economics & Public Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Martin McKee (M)

Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

David Stuckler (D)

Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy and Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH