Domestic cats (Felis catus) prefer freely available food over food that requires effort.
Journal
Animal cognition
ISSN: 1435-9456
Titre abrégé: Anim Cogn
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9814573
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
06
01
2021
accepted:
07
07
2021
revised:
14
06
2021
pubmed:
27
7
2021
medline:
11
3
2022
entrez:
26
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Contrafreeloading is the willingness of animals to work for food when equivalent food is freely available. This behavior is observed in laboratory, domesticated, and captive animals. However, previous research found that six laboratory cats failed to contrafreeload. We hypothesized that cats would contrafreeload in the home environment when given a choice between a food puzzle and a tray of similar size and shape. We also hypothesized that more active cats would be more likely to contrafreeload. We assessed the behavior of 17 neutered, indoor domestic cats (Felis catus) when presented with both a food puzzle and a tray across ten 30-min trials. Each cat wore an activity tracker, and all sessions were video recorded. Cats ate more food from the free feed tray than the puzzle (t (16) = 6.77, p < 0.001). Cats made more first choices to approach and eat from the tray. There was no relationship between activity and contrafreeloading, and there was no effect of sex, age, or previous food puzzle experience on contrafreeloading. Our results suggest that cats do not show strong tendencies to contrafreeload in the home environment, although some cats (N = 4) ate most food offered in the puzzle or showed weak contrafreeloading tendencies (N = 5). Eight cats did not contrafreeload. Cats who consumed more food from the puzzle, consumed more food in general, suggesting a relationship between hunger and effort. Further research is required to understand why domestic cats, unlike other tested species, do not show a strong preference to work for food.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34309759
doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01530-3
pii: 10.1007/s10071-021-01530-3
pmc: PMC8904335
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
95-102Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001860
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Zoo Biol. 2019 Oct;38(5):414-423
pubmed: 31432564
Res Vet Sci. 1997 Mar-Apr;62(2):131-6
pubmed: 9243711
J Exp Psychol. 1963 May;65:451-4
pubmed: 13957621
J Anim Sci. 2009 Feb;87(2):594-602
pubmed: 18997063
Zoo Biol. 2010 Jul-Aug;29(4):484-502
pubmed: 19816856
Zoo Biol. 2014 Jan-Feb;33(1):54-62
pubmed: 24402968
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):303-10
pubmed: 9163936
Behav Processes. 2009 May;81(1):80-4
pubmed: 19429200
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011 Jan 1;238(1):67-73
pubmed: 21194324
J Feline Med Surg. 2016 Sep;18(9):723-32
pubmed: 27102691
Anim Behav. 1997 Jun;53(6):1171-91
pubmed: 9236014
Science. 2014 Oct 3;346(6205):81-5
pubmed: 25278610
Br J Nutr. 2011 Oct;106 Suppl 1:S19-23
pubmed: 22005425
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e89557
pubmed: 24586869
Behav Biol. 1976 Oct;18(2):263-72
pubmed: 999580