Role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the prognosis and classification of muscle injuries in professional football players: correlation between imaging and return to sport time.
Lower extremity
Muscular diseases
Prognosis
Return to sport
Soccer
Journal
La Radiologia medica
ISSN: 1826-6983
Titre abrégé: Radiol Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0177625
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
07
02
2021
accepted:
05
07
2021
pubmed:
27
7
2021
medline:
19
11
2021
entrez:
26
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To study distractive muscle injuries applying US and MRI specific classifications and to find if any correlation exists between the results and the return to sport (RTS) time. The second purpose is to evaluate which classification has the best prognostic value and if the lesions extension correlates with the RTS time. A total of 26 male, professional soccer players (age 21.3 ± 5.6), diagnosed with traumatic muscle injury of the lower limbs, received ultrasound and MRI evaluation within 2 days from the trauma. Concordance between US and MRI findings was investigated. The relationships between MRI and US based injury grading scales and RTS time were evaluated. Correlation between injuries' longitudinal extension and RTS time was also investigated. The correlation between US and MRI measurements returned a Spearman value of r Both US and MRI can be used as prognostic indicators along with the Peetrons (US) and the Mueller-Wohlfahrt (MRI) classifications. MRI is more precise and generates more reproducible results. The lesion craniocaudal extension must be considered as a prognostic indicator, while the injury location inside the muscle or along its major axis has doubtful significance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34309765
doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01396-y
pii: 10.1007/s11547-021-01396-y
pmc: PMC8558158
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1460-1467Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Radiol Med. 2006 Sep;111(6):836-45
pubmed: 16896557
J Sci Med Sport. 2004 Jun;7(2):248-58
pubmed: 15362322
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014 Feb 24;3(4):331-6
pubmed: 24596698
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;49(5):306
pubmed: 25394420
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Oct 15;5(1):e000505
pubmed: 31673400
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009 Nov;17(4):757-73, vii
pubmed: 19887301
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Oct;183(4):975-84
pubmed: 15385289
J Ultrasound Med. 1995 Dec;14(12):899-905
pubmed: 8583525
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Apr;47(6):342-50
pubmed: 23080315
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):197-206
pubmed: 17170160
Skeletal Radiol. 2018 Aug;47(8):1087-1098
pubmed: 29564488
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(18):1370-6
pubmed: 24255767
Acta Biomed. 2019 Sep 06;90(3):238-244
pubmed: 31580309
Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):3532-3541
pubmed: 29460072
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2018 Sep;17(9):296-301
pubmed: 30204633
Eur Radiol. 2002 Jan;12(1):35-43
pubmed: 11868072
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;46(2):112-7
pubmed: 22144005
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010 Jun;14(2):194-200
pubmed: 20486027
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Nov;20(11):2356-62
pubmed: 22773066
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(13):1229-36
pubmed: 24784885
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):399-404
pubmed: 24335495
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Apr;89:182-190
pubmed: 28267537
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Dec;179(6):1621-8
pubmed: 12438066