Effectiveness of technology-based interventions compared with other non-pharmacological interventions for relieving procedural pain in hospitalized neonates: a systematic review protocol.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
27
7
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
26
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of technology-based interventions in relieving procedural pain in hospitalized neonates compared with other non-pharmacological interventions. Neonates requiring hospital care often experience acute pain during medical procedures. The current best practice for relieving pain in neonates is the use of non-pharmacological interventions, such as oral solutions or intervention-based human touch. Technological solutions (such as games, eHealth applications, and mechanical vibrators) have become more commonplace in pediatric pain management over recent years. However, there is a knowledge gap about how effective technology-based interventions are at relieving pain in neonates. This review will consider experimental trials that include technology-based non-pharmacological interventions for relieving procedural pain in hospitalized neonates. Primary outcomes of interest include pain response to a procedure measured by a validated pain assessment scale for neonates, behavioral indicators, and/or changes in physiological indicators. MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Scopus (Elsevier), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the MEDIC databases will be searched for studies published in English, Finnish, and Swedish. Critical appraisal and data extraction will be conducted by two independent researchers following JBI methodology. Quantitative data will be pooled in statistical meta-analyses. If statistical analysis is not possible, the findings will be reported narratively. PROSPERO CRD42021254218.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34310486
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00010
pii: 02174543-900000000-99606
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2770-2776Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 JBI.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Williams MD, Lascelles BDX. Early neonatal pain: a review of clinical and experimental implications on painful conditions later in life. Front Pediatr 2020;8:30.
Ziegler KA, Paul DA, Hoffman M, Locke R. Variation in NICU admission rates without identifiable cause. Hosp Pediatr 2016;6 (5):260.
Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller A-B, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2019;7 (1):e46.
Cruz MD, Fernandes AM, Oliveira CR. Epidemiology of painful procedures performed in neonates: a systematic review of observational studies. Eur J Pain 2016;20 (4):498.
Roofthooft DWE, Simons SHP, Anand KJS, Tibboel D, Van Dijk M. Eight years later, are we still hurting newborn infants? Neonatology 2014;105 (3):226.
Laudiano-Dray MP, Pillai Riddell R, Jones L, Iyer R, Whitehead K, Fitzgerald M, et al. Quantification of neonatal procedural pain severity: a platform for estimating total pain burden in individual infants. Pain 2020;161 (6):1277.
Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Prevention and management of procedural pain in the neonate: an update. Pediatrics 2016;137 (2):e20154271.
Vinall J, Miller SP, Chau V, Brummelte S, Synnes AR, Grunau RE. Neonatal pain in relation to postnatal growth in infants born very preterm. Pain 2012;153 (7):1381.
Coviello C, Popple Martinez M, Drovandi L, Corsini I, Leonardi V, Lunardi C, et al. Neonatal pain in relation to postnatal growth in infants born very preterm. Acta Paediatr 2018;107 (5):790.
Grunau RE, Whitfield MF, Petrie-Thomas J, Synnes AR, Cepeda IL, Keidar A, et al. Neonatal pain, parenting stress and interaction, in relation to cognitive and motor development at 8 and 18 months in preterm infants. Pain 2009;143 (1–2):146.
Vinall J, Miller SP, Bjornson BH, Fitzpatrick KPV, Poskitt KJ, Brant R, et al. Invasive procedures in preterm children: brain and cognitive development at school age. Pediatrics 2014;133 (3):421.
Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A, Haliburton S, Shorkey A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;7 (7):CD001069.
Johnston C, Campbell-Yeo M, Disher T, Benoit B, Fernandes A, Streiner D, et al. Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2 (2):CD008435.
Gomes Neto M, da Silva Lopes IA, Araujo ACCLM, Oliveira LS, Saquetto MB. The effect of facilitated tucking position during painful procedure in pain management of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr 2020;179 (5):709.
Johnston CC, Filion F, Snider L, Limperopoulos C, Majnemer A, Pelausa E, et al. How much sucrose is too much sucrose? Pediatrics 2007;119 (1):226.
Mangat AK, Oei J-L, Chen K, Quah-Smith I, Schmolzer GM. A review of non-pharmacological treatments for pain management in newborn infants. Children 2018;5 (10):130.
Ballard A, Khadra C, Adler S, Trottier ED, Le May S. Efficacy of the buzzy device for pain management during needle-related procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Pain 2019;35 (6):543.
Ueki S, Yamagami Y, Makimoto K. Effectiveness of vibratory stimulation on needle-related procedural pain in children: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2019;17 (7):1463.
Nilsson S, Finnström B, Kokinsky E, Enskär K. The use of virtual reality for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents in a paediatric oncology unit. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2009;13 (2):109.
Hoffman HG, Rodriguez RA, Gonzalez M, Bernardy M, Pena R, Beck W, et al. Immersive virtual reality as an adjunctive non-opioid analgesic for pre-dominantly Latin American children with large severe burn wounds during burn wound cleaning in the intensive care unit: a pilot study. Front Hum Neurosci 2019;13:262.
Asl Aminabadi N, Erfanparast L, Sohrabi A, Ghertasi Oskouei S, Naghili A. The impact of virtual reality distraction on pain and anxiety during dental treatment in 4–6 year-old children: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2012;6 (4):117–124.
Lambert V, Boylan P, Boran L, Hicks P, Kirubakaran R, Devane D, et al. Virtual reality distraction for acute pain in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; (10):CD010686.
Trost MJ, Chrysilla G, Gold JI, Mataric M. Pain research and management socially-assistive robots using empathy to reduce pain and distress during peripheral IV placement in children. Pain Res Manage 2020;2020:7935215.
Trost MJ, Ford AR, Kysh L, Gold JI, Matarić M. Socially assistive robots for helping pediatric distress and pain. Clin J Pain 2019;35 (5):458.
Rossi S, Larafa M, Ruocco M. Emotional and behavioural distraction by a social robot for children anxiety reduction during vaccination. Int J Social Robotics 2020;12 (3):777.
Dol J, Delahunty-Pike A, Siani SA, Campbell-Yeo M. eHealth interventions for parents in neonatal intensive care units: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2017;15 (12):2981–3005.
van Dijk M, de Boer JB, Koot HM, Tibboel D, Passchier J, Duivenvoorden HJ. The reliability and validity of the COMFORT scale as a postoperative pain instrument in 0 to 3-year-old infants. Pain 2000;84 (2–3):377.
Lawrence J, Alcock D, McGrath P, Kay J, MacMurray SB, Dulberg C. The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. J Neonatal Nurs 1993;12 (6):66.
Hummel P, Lawlor-Klean P, Weiss MG. Validity and reliability of the N-PASS assessment tool with acute pain. J Perinatol 2010;30 (7):478.
Stevens BJ, Johnston C, Taddio A, Gibbins S, Yamada J. The premature infant pain profile: evaluation 13 years after development. Clin J Pain 2010;26 (9):830.
Stevens BJ, Gibbins S, Yamada J, Dionne K, Lee G, Johnston C, et al. The premature infant pain profile-revised (PIPP-R): initial validation and feasibility. Clin J Pain 2014;30 (3):243.
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Aromataris E, Munn Z. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. JBI, JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [internet]. Adelaide:2020.
Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, Stern C, Porritt K, Farrow J. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). Int J Evid Based Healthc 2019;17 (1):36–43.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med 2009;3 (3):e123–e130.
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Stephenson M, Aromataris E. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13 (3):207.
Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach [internet]. The GRADE working group. 2013 [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html.