Osteosynthesis devices in absorbable Magnesium alloy in comparison to standard ones: a Systematic Review on effectiveness and safety.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 07 2021
26 07 2021
Historique:
received:
07
05
2021
accepted:
21
06
2021
entrez:
27
7
2021
pubmed:
28
7
2021
medline:
4
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Magnesium (Mg) is a metal physiologically present in bone tissue and essential for bone health. Mg-based-alloys exhibit mechanical properties, namely density and strength, similar to human cortical bone. These features have been exploited for the development of osteosynthesis devices in biodegradable Mg-based-alloys. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to rank the effectiveness and safety of Mg-based alloys applied in bone surgery in comparison to other suitable metals, focusing in particular on Mg superior biocompatibility and biodegradability. a systematic-review of the literature was conducted including only primary research studies dealing with patients suffering from fractured or osteotomized bones fixed using Mg-based osteosynthesis-devices. literature revision suggested Mg-alloys holding comparable properties and side effects in comparison with titanium (Ti) screws, thus showing similar efficacy and safety. In particular, the gas formation in the carpal bones was identified as the main side effect of the Mg-alloys, during the corrosion/degradation phase of Mg. according to the considered literature, the main advantages exploiting Mg-alloys for bone implants are related to their biocompatibility, bio-absorbability/-degradability, the lack of surgical removal, osteoconductivity and antibacterial activity. On the opposite, the main limitation of Mg-alloys is due to the poor mechanical resistance of small devices for internal fixation of bone fragments that lack of sufficient strength to withstand high forces. Therefore, an important future prospect could rely in the development of innovative hybrid systems aimed at fixing high load-bearing fractures, as well as in regenerative-medicine by developing new Mg-based engineered scaffolds.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK
Magnesium (Mg) is a metal physiologically present in bone tissue and essential for bone health. Mg-based-alloys exhibit mechanical properties, namely density and strength, similar to human cortical bone. These features have been exploited for the development of osteosynthesis devices in biodegradable Mg-based-alloys. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to rank the effectiveness and safety of Mg-based alloys applied in bone surgery in comparison to other suitable metals, focusing in particular on Mg superior biocompatibility and biodegradability.
METHODS
a systematic-review of the literature was conducted including only primary research studies dealing with patients suffering from fractured or osteotomized bones fixed using Mg-based osteosynthesis-devices.
RESULTS
literature revision suggested Mg-alloys holding comparable properties and side effects in comparison with titanium (Ti) screws, thus showing similar efficacy and safety. In particular, the gas formation in the carpal bones was identified as the main side effect of the Mg-alloys, during the corrosion/degradation phase of Mg.
CONCLUSIONS
according to the considered literature, the main advantages exploiting Mg-alloys for bone implants are related to their biocompatibility, bio-absorbability/-degradability, the lack of surgical removal, osteoconductivity and antibacterial activity. On the opposite, the main limitation of Mg-alloys is due to the poor mechanical resistance of small devices for internal fixation of bone fragments that lack of sufficient strength to withstand high forces. Therefore, an important future prospect could rely in the development of innovative hybrid systems aimed at fixing high load-bearing fractures, as well as in regenerative-medicine by developing new Mg-based engineered scaffolds.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34313658
doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS3.11757
pmc: PMC8420826
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alloys
0
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Magnesium
I38ZP9992A
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2021025Références
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;55(6):623-625
pubmed: 28460872
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 Nov;103(11):3526-32
pubmed: 25974048
Biomaterials. 2016 Mar;81:84-92
pubmed: 26724456
Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jun;25(3):398-405
pubmed: 30321972
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Apr 1;61:865-74
pubmed: 26838918
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 04;13(18):
pubmed: 32899725
Biomaterials. 2010 Mar;31(8):2084-96
pubmed: 20031201
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Mar;24 Suppl 1:S76-80
pubmed: 20182242
Acta Biomater. 2009 Sep;5(7):2783-9
pubmed: 19427423
Acta Biomater. 2011 Apr;7(4):1452-9
pubmed: 21145436
Biomaterials. 2006 Mar;27(9):1728-34
pubmed: 16246414
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2012 May 1;93:67-74
pubmed: 22225942
Biomaterials. 2017 Jan;112:287-302
pubmed: 27770632
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2017 Feb;49(1):37-41
pubmed: 28273677
Acta Biomater. 2012 Jul;8(7):2442-55
pubmed: 22510401
Cureus. 2018 Apr 26;10(4):e2539
pubmed: 29951346
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jul 19;20(1):334
pubmed: 31319832
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;51(5):421-7
pubmed: 22901526
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Biomaterials. 2010 Aug;31(22):5782-8
pubmed: 20452668
Nutrition. 2001 Jul-Aug;17(7-8):679-80
pubmed: 11448600
J Orthop Translat. 2019 Feb 14;17:133-137
pubmed: 31194045
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12
pubmed: 8721797
Case Rep Orthop. 2016;2016:9673174
pubmed: 27833771
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Aug;138(8):1069-1075
pubmed: 29696362
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):716-21
pubmed: 26729859
J Orthop Res. 2016 Dec;34(12):2207-2214
pubmed: 28005292
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Mar;23(2):321-327
pubmed: 29174422
Acta Biomater. 2010 May;6(5):1680-92
pubmed: 20172057
Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7
pubmed: 16814787
Cureus. 2018 Dec 19;10(12):e3752
pubmed: 30820372
Trauma Case Rep. 2017 Jan 07;8:11-15
pubmed: 29644307
Case Rep Orthop. 2016;2016:7049130
pubmed: 27800201
J Orthop Traumatol. 2020 May 25;21(1):9
pubmed: 32451727
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Nov 02;16:329
pubmed: 26527162
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Mar;79(3):637-643
pubmed: 32224081
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jan 10;20(2):
pubmed: 30634646
Clin Chim Acta. 2000 Apr;294(1-2):1-26
pubmed: 10727669
J Trauma. 1996 Nov;41(5):846-9
pubmed: 8913214
Injury. 2018 Nov;49 Suppl 3:S48-S53
pubmed: 30415669
Biomed Eng Online. 2013 Jul 03;12:62
pubmed: 23819489
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 19;2018:5242806
pubmed: 30581858
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Jan;30(1):163-173
pubmed: 31375999
Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Dec;25(6):727-732
pubmed: 30321917
J Wrist Surg. 2020 Apr;9(2):150-155
pubmed: 32257617