Cochlear implant user perceptions of magnetic resonance imaging.

Cochlear implants Diagnostic medical imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Patient perceptions Safety User consultation

Journal

Cochlear implants international
ISSN: 1754-7628
Titre abrégé: Cochlear Implants Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101121166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 29 7 2021
medline: 26 4 2022
entrez: 28 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To characterise opinions about needing to undergo MRI within the population of current cochlear implant (CI) users. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of CI users is often associated with severe discomfort and magnet displacement. A global online survey of 310 CI users was conducted between 22nd July and 13th September 2020. Only 55% of respondents had been told whether their model of CI could undergo MRI. 31% of respondents considered MRI when deciding whether to receive a CI, and 28% when deciding which CI model to have. 64% reported concerns related to their CI if needing MRI compared to 29% reporting concerns unrelated to their CI. Willingness to undergo MRI reduced when considering magnet removal, splinting, bandaging, local anaesthesia, lasting discomfort, an inability to use their CI, or a reduction in image quality because of their CI. The single most influential factor was the possibility of damaging their CI (63%). 59% of respondents would consider minor surgery to upgrade their retaining magnet to one of a rotating design. These findings highlight the heterogeneity of CI users' opinions about MRI. We suggest several opportunities for improving the dissemination of current and accurate MRI-related information for CI users.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To characterise opinions about needing to undergo MRI within the population of current cochlear implant (CI) users.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of CI users is often associated with severe discomfort and magnet displacement.
METHODS METHODS
A global online survey of 310 CI users was conducted between 22nd July and 13th September 2020.
RESULTS RESULTS
Only 55% of respondents had been told whether their model of CI could undergo MRI. 31% of respondents considered MRI when deciding whether to receive a CI, and 28% when deciding which CI model to have. 64% reported concerns related to their CI if needing MRI compared to 29% reporting concerns unrelated to their CI. Willingness to undergo MRI reduced when considering magnet removal, splinting, bandaging, local anaesthesia, lasting discomfort, an inability to use their CI, or a reduction in image quality because of their CI. The single most influential factor was the possibility of damaging their CI (63%). 59% of respondents would consider minor surgery to upgrade their retaining magnet to one of a rotating design.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
These findings highlight the heterogeneity of CI users' opinions about MRI.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
We suggest several opportunities for improving the dissemination of current and accurate MRI-related information for CI users.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34315344
doi: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1954748
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

11-20

Auteurs

R S Dewey (RS)

Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Hearing Sciences, Division of Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK.

P T Kitterick (PT)

Hearing Sciences, Division of Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH