Multilevel mixed effects analysis of individual and community level factors associated with modern contraceptive use among married women in Uganda.
Community
Married women
Modern contraceptives
Uganda
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 07 2021
27 07 2021
Historique:
received:
02
06
2020
accepted:
16
05
2021
entrez:
28
7
2021
pubmed:
29
7
2021
medline:
6
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In spite of the universal right for women to decide freely for themselves when, and how many children they want to have in life, married women in Uganda are less likely to use modern contraceptives as compared to other marital categories. This study examines the individual and community factors associated with modern contraceptive use among married women in Uganda. The study used data from the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey which comprised of 8671 married women aged 15-49 years who were fecund and non-pregnant at the time of the survey. Analysis was done using a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model. Findings showed that married women who were; Muslims (AOR = 0.78, CI = 0.66-0.91), had more than five children (AOR = 0.76, CI = 0.61-0.98), staying in communities with high poverty (AOR = 0.78, CI = 0.65-0.93), with older age at first birth (AOR = 0.94, CI = 0.92-0.96) as well as having spousal age difference of more than 9 years (AOR = 0.86, CI = 0.76-0.98) were associated with low modern contraceptive use. Women living in communities with higher age at first marriage (AOR = 0.93, CI = 0.88-0.98) or higher sexual debut (AOR = 0.91, CI = 0.85-0.98) were also associated with reduced odds of modern contraception. In addition, older women (AOR = 1.03, CI = 1.01-1.04), having secondary/higher education (AOR = 1.93, CI = 1.58-2.37), living in a rich household (AOR = 1.32, CI = 1.14-1.53), short distance to health facility (AOR = 1.18, CI = 1.06-1.31), high community education (AOR = 1.38, CI = 1.17-1.62), high community exposure to family planning messages (AOR = 1.24, CI = 1.08-1.42), and communities with high proportion of women working (AOR = 1.22, CI = 1.06-1.39) were more likely to use modern contraceptives. The study revealed that both individual and community factors were important in explaining the factors associated with modern contraceptive use among married women in Uganda. Therefore, there is need to invest in community based programs like: family planning outreach services, mass media campaigns and community mobilization activities to help in dissemination of family planning information, increase awareness and promotion in use of modern contraceptives. Also, expansion of higher education and the need to make family planning services available and accessible to areas with limited physical access to health facilities will lead to sustained increase in uptake of modern contraceptives.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In spite of the universal right for women to decide freely for themselves when, and how many children they want to have in life, married women in Uganda are less likely to use modern contraceptives as compared to other marital categories. This study examines the individual and community factors associated with modern contraceptive use among married women in Uganda.
METHODS
The study used data from the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey which comprised of 8671 married women aged 15-49 years who were fecund and non-pregnant at the time of the survey. Analysis was done using a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model.
RESULTS
Findings showed that married women who were; Muslims (AOR = 0.78, CI = 0.66-0.91), had more than five children (AOR = 0.76, CI = 0.61-0.98), staying in communities with high poverty (AOR = 0.78, CI = 0.65-0.93), with older age at first birth (AOR = 0.94, CI = 0.92-0.96) as well as having spousal age difference of more than 9 years (AOR = 0.86, CI = 0.76-0.98) were associated with low modern contraceptive use. Women living in communities with higher age at first marriage (AOR = 0.93, CI = 0.88-0.98) or higher sexual debut (AOR = 0.91, CI = 0.85-0.98) were also associated with reduced odds of modern contraception. In addition, older women (AOR = 1.03, CI = 1.01-1.04), having secondary/higher education (AOR = 1.93, CI = 1.58-2.37), living in a rich household (AOR = 1.32, CI = 1.14-1.53), short distance to health facility (AOR = 1.18, CI = 1.06-1.31), high community education (AOR = 1.38, CI = 1.17-1.62), high community exposure to family planning messages (AOR = 1.24, CI = 1.08-1.42), and communities with high proportion of women working (AOR = 1.22, CI = 1.06-1.39) were more likely to use modern contraceptives.
CONCLUSION
The study revealed that both individual and community factors were important in explaining the factors associated with modern contraceptive use among married women in Uganda. Therefore, there is need to invest in community based programs like: family planning outreach services, mass media campaigns and community mobilization activities to help in dissemination of family planning information, increase awareness and promotion in use of modern contraceptives. Also, expansion of higher education and the need to make family planning services available and accessible to areas with limited physical access to health facilities will lead to sustained increase in uptake of modern contraceptives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34315436
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11069-0
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-11069-0
pmc: PMC8314485
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contraceptive Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1457Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Afr J Reprod Health. 2017 Jun;21(2):35-48
pubmed: 29624938
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 15;5(12):e008371
pubmed: 26671948
Soc Biol. 2000 Spring-Summer;47(1-2):51-60
pubmed: 11521456
Health Promot Int. 2018 Apr 1;33(2):311-317
pubmed: 28334747
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219963
pubmed: 31318953
J Health Popul Nutr. 2020 Dec 7;39(1):15
pubmed: 33287906
Lancet. 2018 Mar 3;391(10123):870-882
pubmed: 29217374
Afr J Reprod Health. 2012 Sep;16(3):48-56
pubmed: 23437499
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015 Jan;41(1):24-6
pubmed: 25331120
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;15:262
pubmed: 25885372
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Jun;43(2):94-102
pubmed: 21651708
Reprod Health. 2014 Mar 05;11(1):21
pubmed: 24597502
Arch Public Health. 2019 Oct 30;77:46
pubmed: 31687139
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 31;18(1):390
pubmed: 29855292
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 31;10(3):e030980
pubmed: 32234737
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):430
pubmed: 29609567
Etude Popul Afr. 2014 Jul;28(2):1009-1021
pubmed: 25530666
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2015 Nov;77(4):551-61
pubmed: 26663934
J Contracept Stud. 2016 Jan 26;1(1):
pubmed: 28317036
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Jan;21(1):73-9
pubmed: 21992618
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 10;6(3):e009991
pubmed: 26966059
Arch Public Health. 2018 Jan 29;76:5
pubmed: 29423218
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Sep;45(3):301-14
pubmed: 25207494