Aortic annuloplasty: Subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal rings.
annuloplasty
aortic valve
aortic valve reconstruction
Journal
JTCVS techniques
ISSN: 2666-2507
Titre abrégé: JTCVS Tech
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768546
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
09
12
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
entrez:
28
7
2021
pubmed:
29
7
2021
medline:
29
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aortic valve repair and valve-preserving root replacement have evolved into increasingly practiced procedures. With increasing experience, the need for an annuloplasty has become more evident, at least for pathologies that involve annular dilatation. To understand the effect of an aortic annuloplasty, it is necessary to know the details of aortic valve and root anatomy. Geometrically, the functional annulus is best defined as the virtual basal ring, ie, plane of the cusp nadirs. The sinotubular diameter also influences the aortic valve form, at least in tricuspid valves. Different annuloplasty concepts have been developed for isolated valve repair or in combination with root remodeling, such as subcommissural sutures, suture annuloplasty, external, and internal rings. Subcommissural sutures do not consistently provide durable annular stabilization. More positive results have been published for circular approaches, ie, suture annuloplasty, external, or internal rings. The results of different techniques are difficult to judge because most outcome data have not been analyzed with control of confounding predictors of repair failure. The evidence that annuloplasty improves aortic valve function and repair durability is best documented for isolated bicuspid aortic valve repair. In summary, the addition of annuloplasty to aortic valve reconstruction is probably a useful tool to improve valve competence and stabilize the repair. This is best documented for isolated bicuspid valve repair and circular approaches. The relative benefit of individual concepts is difficult to judge because of lack of both control groups and control of confounding factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34318215
doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.12.044
pii: S2666-2507(21)00108-5
pmc: PMC8311589
doi:
Types de publication
Editorial
Langues
eng
Pagination
98-102Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Références
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Feb;103(2):504-510
pubmed: 27663792
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 May;153(5):1033-1042
pubmed: 28187973
J Thorac Surg. 1958 Feb;35(2):192-205 passim
pubmed: 13514815
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;99(6):2010-6
pubmed: 25865762
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1966 Sep;59(9):1305-12
pubmed: 4961576
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Jan;107(1):162-70
pubmed: 8283879
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):406-411.e1
pubmed: 22365065
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):414-8
pubmed: 17258575
Heart. 2000 Dec;84(6):670-3
pubmed: 11083753
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Aug;2(8):931-9
pubmed: 19679280
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Feb 20;:
pubmed: 30789231
Circulation. 2011 Jan 18;123(2):178-85
pubmed: 21200006
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jan;36(Suppl 1):64-70
pubmed: 33061186
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Feb 1;57(2):308-316
pubmed: 31292613
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Sep;86(3):323-37
pubmed: 6887954
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Aug;44(2):316-22; discussion 322-3
pubmed: 23475588
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;5(12):1366-1373
pubmed: 32936224
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 1;64(8):507-12
pubmed: 2773795
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;18(1):49-54; discussion 54-5
pubmed: 24065345
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jun;97(6):2211-3
pubmed: 24882316
Circulation. 1986 Sep;74(3 Pt 2):I136-42
pubmed: 3742771
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):428-37; discussion 437-8
pubmed: 25721823
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;2(1):57-64
pubmed: 23977560
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar;155(3):885-894.e3
pubmed: 29221734
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):987-93
pubmed: 26156945