Best practices and opportunities for integrating nutrition specific into nutrition sensitive interventions in fragile contexts: a systematic review.
Integration
Multi-sectoral programme
Nutrition outcome
Nutrition sensitive
Nutrition specific
Journal
BMC nutrition
ISSN: 2055-0928
Titre abrégé: BMC Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672434
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jul 2021
29 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
22
12
2020
accepted:
19
05
2021
entrez:
29
7
2021
pubmed:
30
7
2021
medline:
30
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Annually, undernutrition contributes globally to 45% (3.1 million) of preventable deaths in children under 5. Effect following undernutrition i.e. physical growth & cognitive development etc. can be prevented during the first 1000 days also called window of opportunity. There is substantial evidence of positive nutrition outcomes resulting from integrating nutrition-specific interventions into nutrition specific program. However, there is paucity of knowledge on establishing and sustaining effective integration of nutrition intervention in fragile context. The objective of this review is to map and review the integration of nutrition-specific intervention to nutrition sensitive program and its impacts on nutrition outcomes. In the study, we systematically searched the literature on integrated nutrition intervention into multi-sectoral programme in PUBMED, Google's Scholar, the Cochrane Library, World Health Organisation (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank and trial registers from their inception until Oct 30, 2020 for up-to-date published and grey resources. We screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in duplicates. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020209730). Forty-four studies were included in this review, outlining the integration of nutrition-specific interventions among children 0-59 months with various existing programme. Most common integration platform in the study included integrated community case management and Integrated Management of Childhood Illness, Child Health Days, immunization, early child development, and cash transfers. Limited quantitative data were suggestive of some positive impact on nutrition and non-nutrition outcomes with a number of model of integration which varies according to the context and demands of the particular setting in which integration occurs. Overall, existing evidence for nutrition sensitive and specific interventions is not robust and remains limited. It's worthwhile to note, for future studies/interventions should be based on the context key criteria like relevance, political support, effectiveness, feasibility, expected contribution to health system strengthening, local capacities, ease of integration and targeting for sustainability, cost effectiveness and financial availability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Annually, undernutrition contributes globally to 45% (3.1 million) of preventable deaths in children under 5. Effect following undernutrition i.e. physical growth & cognitive development etc. can be prevented during the first 1000 days also called window of opportunity. There is substantial evidence of positive nutrition outcomes resulting from integrating nutrition-specific interventions into nutrition specific program. However, there is paucity of knowledge on establishing and sustaining effective integration of nutrition intervention in fragile context. The objective of this review is to map and review the integration of nutrition-specific intervention to nutrition sensitive program and its impacts on nutrition outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
In the study, we systematically searched the literature on integrated nutrition intervention into multi-sectoral programme in PUBMED, Google's Scholar, the Cochrane Library, World Health Organisation (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank and trial registers from their inception until Oct 30, 2020 for up-to-date published and grey resources. We screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in duplicates. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020209730).
RESULT
RESULTS
Forty-four studies were included in this review, outlining the integration of nutrition-specific interventions among children 0-59 months with various existing programme. Most common integration platform in the study included integrated community case management and Integrated Management of Childhood Illness, Child Health Days, immunization, early child development, and cash transfers. Limited quantitative data were suggestive of some positive impact on nutrition and non-nutrition outcomes with a number of model of integration which varies according to the context and demands of the particular setting in which integration occurs.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, existing evidence for nutrition sensitive and specific interventions is not robust and remains limited. It's worthwhile to note, for future studies/interventions should be based on the context key criteria like relevance, political support, effectiveness, feasibility, expected contribution to health system strengthening, local capacities, ease of integration and targeting for sustainability, cost effectiveness and financial availability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34321101
doi: 10.1186/s40795-021-00443-1
pii: 10.1186/s40795-021-00443-1
pmc: PMC8320180
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
46Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Food Nutr Bull. 2009 Sep;30(3):233-44
pubmed: 19927603
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Nov;98(5):1335-42
pubmed: 24067666
Lancet. 2004 Oct 30-Nov 5;364(9445):1583-94
pubmed: 15519628
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Sep;83(3):559-64
pubmed: 20810820
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Jan;1308:218-31
pubmed: 24673168
Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):371-372
pubmed: 23746782
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Oct;86(10):796-804, A
pubmed: 18949217
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Apr;14(2):e12519
pubmed: 29024381
Matern Child Nutr. 2013 Jan;9(1):130-42
pubmed: 22515318
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Sep;19(9):1985-92
pubmed: 25665894
BMJ. 2012 Mar 21;344:e1634
pubmed: 22438367
Lancet. 2013 Aug 10;382(9891):536-51
pubmed: 23746780
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Dec;31(10):1364-1373
pubmed: 27296062
J Glob Health. 2014 Dec;4(2):020401
pubmed: 25520791
Nutr J. 2014 Mar 20;13:22
pubmed: 24649941
Lancet. 2004 Oct 30-Nov 5;364(9445):1595-602
pubmed: 15519629
J Infect Dis. 2012 Mar;205 Suppl 1:S120-5
pubmed: 22315379
Indian J Pediatr. 2000 May;67(5):322-8
pubmed: 10885201
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Jan;19(1):1-10
pubmed: 14679280
Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):243-60
pubmed: 18207566
Matern Child Nutr. 2015 Oct;11(4):1011-22
pubmed: 23941290
Health Policy Plan. 2005 Dec;20 Suppl 1:i69-i76
pubmed: 16306072
Bull World Health Organ. 1989;67(1):77-80
pubmed: 2706729
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39(2):613-29
pubmed: 20202929
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0183316
pubmed: 28910328
Lancet. 2014 Oct 4;384(9950):1282-93
pubmed: 24947106
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 04;11(3):e0149218
pubmed: 26943124
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Mar;15(3):296-305
pubmed: 20070638
J Glob Health. 2015 Jun;5(1):010401
pubmed: 25674350
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Lancet. 2009 Aug 1;374(9687):393-403
pubmed: 19647607
J Nutr. 2017 Dec;147(12):2326-2337
pubmed: 29021370
Am J Public Health. 2000 Oct;90(10):1526-9
pubmed: 11029982
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Aug;91(2):424-434
pubmed: 24799369
Lancet. 2008 Jan 26;371(9609):340-57
pubmed: 18206223
Food Nutr Bull. 2013 Dec;34(4):412-9
pubmed: 24605691
Lancet. 2013 Aug 10;382(9891):552-69
pubmed: 23746781
J Infect Dis. 2012 Mar;205 Suppl 1:S28-39
pubmed: 22315383
Health Policy Plan. 2005 Dec;20 Suppl 1:i77-i84
pubmed: 16306073
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Jan;1308:149-61
pubmed: 24571216
J Transcult Nurs. 2015 Sep;26(4):402-8
pubmed: 24810514
BMJ. 2014 Aug 29;349:g4988
pubmed: 25172514
BMC Med. 2017 Apr 26;15(1):87
pubmed: 28441944
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 May;96(5):1253-1260
pubmed: 28193744