Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol.
change management
organisational development
quality in health care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 07 2021
28 07 2021
Historique:
entrez:
29
7
2021
pubmed:
30
7
2021
medline:
5
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the use of a wide variety of improvement tools and approaches, healthcare organisations continue to struggle in several key areas. Complexity-informed approaches have the potential to offer health and social care a new paradigm for understanding, designing, implementing and evaluating solutions, yet so far has failed to gain the traction anticipated some years ago. There is a growing need for high quality syntheses of the existing knowledge base in this area and given the diversity of theory and approaches, a scoping review is the best approach to curate this knowledge. A scoping review of relevant literature from January 2000 to present, using the refined Arksey and O'Malley six-stage framework will be conducted. This protocol will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. A three-step search strategy will be used. An initial search of databases will be undertaken to identify key search terms followed by an analysis of retrieved papers title and abstract text words, and of index terms used to describe the articles. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Third, the reference lists of identified reports and articles will be searched. Authors of primary articles will be contacted and a search for grey material performed. Finally, a complete search strategy of one major database will be included. As this is a scoping review, ethical approval is not required. The results of the scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences and will guide a large research project investigating teamwork. All data will be stored in accordance with best General Data Protection Regulation practice. This scoping review protocol has been registered with Open Science Framework.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34321301
pii: bmjopen-2020-047633
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047633
pmc: PMC8319978
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e047633Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):600-606
pubmed: 29380477
BMJ. 2018 May 17;361:k2014
pubmed: 29773537
Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 20;11(1):127
pubmed: 27647152
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3
pubmed: 27366130
Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Jul 09;6:7
pubmed: 18613961
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252
pubmed: 30196093
BMJ. 2001 Sep 15;323(7313):625-8
pubmed: 11557716
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 12;16:87
pubmed: 26968157
BMJ. 2019 Oct 1;367:l5514
pubmed: 31575526
Future Hosp J. 2016 Oct;3(3):191-194
pubmed: 31098223
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143
pubmed: 30453902
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48
pubmed: 23522333
BMC Med. 2018 Apr 30;16(1):63
pubmed: 29706132
BMJ. 2001 Oct 6;323(7316):799-803
pubmed: 11588088
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Jun;21(3):153-9
pubmed: 19383716
BMJ. 2001 Sep 29;323(7315):746-9
pubmed: 11576986
Science. 1999 Apr 2;284(5411):107-9
pubmed: 10103172
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2127-2133
pubmed: 33038125
J Nurs Adm. 2001 Oct;31(10):474-82
pubmed: 11676217
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e027308
pubmed: 30904877
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):95
pubmed: 29921272