Association of Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes With Gut Microbial Diversity: A Microbiome-Wide Analysis From Population Studies.
Adult
Bacteria
/ genetics
Blood Glucose
/ analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ microbiology
Feces
/ microbiology
Female
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
/ genetics
Humans
Insulin
/ blood
Insulin Resistance
Male
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Prospective Studies
RNA, Bacterial
/ analysis
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
/ analysis
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2021
01 07 2021
Historique:
entrez:
29
7
2021
pubmed:
30
7
2021
medline:
4
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous studies have indicated that gut microbiome may be associated with development of type 2 diabetes. However, these studies are limited by small sample size and insufficient for confounding. Furthermore, which specific taxa play a role in the development of type 2 diabetes remains unclear. To examine associations of gut microbiome composition with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes in a large population-based setting controlling for various sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. This cross-sectional analysis included 2166 participants from 2 Dutch population-based prospective cohorts: the Rotterdam Study and the LifeLines-DEEP study. The 16S ribosomal RNA method was used to measure microbiome composition in stool samples collected between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013. The α diversity (Shannon, richness, and Inverse Simpson indexes), β diversity (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix), and taxa (from domain to genus level) were identified to reflect gut microbiome composition. Associations among α diversity, β diversity, and taxa with the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) and with type 2 diabetes were examined. Glucose and insulin were measured to calculate the HOMA-IR. Type 2 diabetes cases were identified based on glucose levels and medical records from January 2012 to December 2013. Analyses were adjusted for technical covariates, lifestyle, sociodemographic, and medical factors. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. There were 2166 participants in this study: 1418 from the Rotterdam Study (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [5.9] years; 815 [57.5%] male) and 748 from the LifeLines-DEEP study (mean [SD] age, 44.7 [13.4] years; 431 [57.6%] male); from this total, 193 type 2 diabetes cases were identified. Lower microbiome Shannon index and richness were associated with higher HOMA-IR (eg, Shannon index, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.02), and patients with type 2 diabetes had a lower richness than participants without diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.99). The β diversity (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix) was associated with insulin resistance (R2 = 0.004, P = .001 in the Rotterdam Study and R2 = 0.005, P = .002 in the LifeLines-DEEP study). A total of 12 groups of bacteria were associated with HOMA-IR or type 2 diabetes. Specifically, a higher abundance of Christensenellaceae (β = -0.08; 95% CI, -0.12 to -0.03: P < .001), Christensenellaceae R7 group (β = -0.07; 95% CI, -0.12 to -0.03; P < .001), Marvinbryantia (β = -0.07; 95% CI, -0.11 to -0.03; P < .001), Ruminococcaceae UCG005 (β = -0.09; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.05; P < .001), Ruminococcaceae UCG008 (β = -0.07; 95% CI, -0.11 to -0.03; P < .001), Ruminococcaceae UCG010 (β = -0.08; 95% CI, -0.12 to -0.04; P < .001), or Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 group (β = -0.09; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.05; P < .001) was associated with lower HOMA-IR. A higher abundance of Clostridiaceae 1 (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.65; P < .001), Peptostreptococcaceae (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45-0.70; P < .001), C sensu stricto 1 (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.40-0.65; P < .001), Intestinibacter (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48-0.76; P < .001), or Romboutsia (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.70; P < .001) was associated with less type 2 diabetes. These bacteria are all known to produce butyrate. In this cross-sectional study, higher microbiome α diversity, along with more butyrate-producing gut bacteria, was associated with less type 2 diabetes and with lower insulin resistance among individuals without diabetes. These findings could help provide insight into the etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34323983
pii: 2782527
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18811
pmc: PMC8322996
doi:
Substances chimiques
Blood Glucose
0
Insulin
0
RNA, Bacterial
0
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2118811Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec;31(6):619-623
pubmed: 29566904
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 23;10(1):1040
pubmed: 31974429
Gut. 2020 Aug;69(8):1510-1519
pubmed: 32409589
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 22;9(1):287
pubmed: 30670726
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38(1):159-65
pubmed: 25538312
Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Sep;95(3):221-7
pubmed: 16077740
Nature. 2015 Dec 10;528(7581):262-266
pubmed: 26633628
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;32(9):807-850
pubmed: 29064009
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7
pubmed: 17938396
Cell. 2014 Nov 6;159(4):789-99
pubmed: 25417156
Lancet. 2017 Jun 3;389(10085):2239-2251
pubmed: 28190580
Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):55-60
pubmed: 23023125
mSystems. 2017 Jul 18;2(4):
pubmed: 28761933
Nutrients. 2019 Jul 16;11(7):
pubmed: 31315227
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1172-80
pubmed: 25502107
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 28;5(8):e006772
pubmed: 26319774
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Apr;71(4):405-11
pubmed: 24535643
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 05;5(2):e9085
pubmed: 20140211
Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):99-103
pubmed: 23719380
Gut. 1994 Jan;35(1 Suppl):S35-8
pubmed: 8125387
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Jan;4(1):44-51
pubmed: 26575606
Circ Res. 2019 Jun 7;124(12):1808-1820
pubmed: 30971183
Nature. 2016 Jul 21;535(7612):376-81
pubmed: 27409811
Diabetologia. 1985 Jul;28(7):412-9
pubmed: 3899825
Science. 2016 Apr 29;352(6285):560-4
pubmed: 27126039