Development of a Clinical Judgment Scale for Japanese Nurses.


Journal

Journal of continuing education in nursing
ISSN: 1938-2472
Titre abrégé: J Contin Educ Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0262321

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
entrez: 29 7 2021
pubmed: 30 7 2021
medline: 5 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to develop a scale to assess the clinical judgment of nurses based on the clinical judgment process. Based on a qualitative analysis of interviews with specialized and certified nurses and extant literature, a scale comprising 44 question items was created. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 1,444 nurses working in 28 general hospitals, psychiatric wards, cardiac care units, and intensive care units in Japan. Valid responses were obtained from 610 nurses. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the 23 items extracted by item analysis, and two factors, "theoretical and practical reasoning" and "grasping the condition by observation," were extracted. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed the fit of the model. Cronbach's alpha confidence factor was 0.943 for the first factor and 0.924 for the second factor. These results support the factor validity and reliability of the clinical judgment scale.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to develop a scale to assess the clinical judgment of nurses based on the clinical judgment process.
METHOD METHODS
Based on a qualitative analysis of interviews with specialized and certified nurses and extant literature, a scale comprising 44 question items was created. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 1,444 nurses working in 28 general hospitals, psychiatric wards, cardiac care units, and intensive care units in Japan.
RESULTS RESULTS
Valid responses were obtained from 610 nurses. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the 23 items extracted by item analysis, and two factors, "theoretical and practical reasoning" and "grasping the condition by observation," were extracted. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed the fit of the model. Cronbach's alpha confidence factor was 0.943 for the first factor and 0.924 for the second factor.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
These results support the factor validity and reliability of the clinical judgment scale.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34324379
doi: 10.3928/00220124-20210714-08
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

383-391

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH