Hepatitis C elimination in Myanmar: Modelling the impact, cost, cost-effectiveness and economic benefits.
Elimination
Hepatitis C
Low and middle income country
Mathematical model
Myanmar
Journal
The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific
ISSN: 2666-6065
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health West Pac
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101774968
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
11
11
2020
revised:
25
02
2021
accepted:
01
03
2021
entrez:
30
7
2021
pubmed:
31
7
2021
medline:
31
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Myanmar has set national hepatitis C (HCV) targets to achieve 50% of people diagnosed and 50% treated by 2030. The WHO has additional targets of reducing incidence by 80% and mortality by 65% by 2030. We aimed to estimate the impact, cost, cost-effectiveness and net economic benefit of achieving these targets. Mathematical models of HCV transmission, disease progression and the care cascade were calibrated to 15 administrative regions of Myanmar. Cost data were collected from a community testing and treatment program in Yangon. Three scenarios were projected for 2020-2030: (1) baseline (current levels of testing/treatment); and testing/treatment scaled up sufficiently to reach (2) the national strategy targets; and (3) the WHO targets. Without treatment scale-up, 333,000 new HCV infections and 97,000 HCV-related deaths were estimated to occur in Myanmar 2020-2030, with HCV costing a total $100 million in direct costs (testing, treatment, disease management) and $10.4 billion in lost productivity. In the model, treating 55,000 people each year was sufficient to reach the national strategy targets and prevented a cumulative 40,000 new infections (12%) and 25,000 HCV-related deaths (25%) 2020-2030. This was estimated to cost a total $189 million in direct costs ($243 per DALY averted compared to no treatment scale-up), but only $9.8 billion in lost productivity, making it cost-saving from a societal perspective by 2024 with an estimated net economic benefit of $553 million by 2030. Reaching the WHO targets required further treatment scale-up and additional direct costs but resulted in greater longer-term benefits. Current levels of HCV testing and treatment in Myanmar are insufficient to reach the national strategy targets. Scaling up HCV testing and treatment in Myanmar to reach the national strategy targets is estimated to generate significant health and economic benefits. Gilead Sciences.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Myanmar has set national hepatitis C (HCV) targets to achieve 50% of people diagnosed and 50% treated by 2030. The WHO has additional targets of reducing incidence by 80% and mortality by 65% by 2030. We aimed to estimate the impact, cost, cost-effectiveness and net economic benefit of achieving these targets.
METHODS
METHODS
Mathematical models of HCV transmission, disease progression and the care cascade were calibrated to 15 administrative regions of Myanmar. Cost data were collected from a community testing and treatment program in Yangon. Three scenarios were projected for 2020-2030: (1) baseline (current levels of testing/treatment); and testing/treatment scaled up sufficiently to reach (2) the national strategy targets; and (3) the WHO targets.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Without treatment scale-up, 333,000 new HCV infections and 97,000 HCV-related deaths were estimated to occur in Myanmar 2020-2030, with HCV costing a total $100 million in direct costs (testing, treatment, disease management) and $10.4 billion in lost productivity. In the model, treating 55,000 people each year was sufficient to reach the national strategy targets and prevented a cumulative 40,000 new infections (12%) and 25,000 HCV-related deaths (25%) 2020-2030. This was estimated to cost a total $189 million in direct costs ($243 per DALY averted compared to no treatment scale-up), but only $9.8 billion in lost productivity, making it cost-saving from a societal perspective by 2024 with an estimated net economic benefit of $553 million by 2030. Reaching the WHO targets required further treatment scale-up and additional direct costs but resulted in greater longer-term benefits.
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
Current levels of HCV testing and treatment in Myanmar are insufficient to reach the national strategy targets. Scaling up HCV testing and treatment in Myanmar to reach the national strategy targets is estimated to generate significant health and economic benefits.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
Gilead Sciences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34327345
doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100129
pii: S2666-6065(21)00038-9
pmc: PMC8315611
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100129Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
NS and the Burnet Institute received investigator-initiated research funding from Gilead Sciences for this work. KPK receives non-financial support from Mylan Myanmar, Hetero Pharmaceutical, and Royal Ruby Co. Ltd. WN received non-financial support from Mylan Myanmar and Cipla Pharmaceutical. MH receives investigator-initiated research funding from Gilead Sciences and AbbVie outside of this work. TMW, TT, HH, BD, PTZA, YX, AB, CK, SS, KSA have nothing to declare.
Références
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17265-78
pubmed: 25516637
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;5(10):940-947
pubmed: 32730785
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e712-23
pubmed: 26475018
Gastroenterology. 2014 Mar;146(3):736-743.e1
pubmed: 24262278
Gut. 2017 Aug;66(8):1507-1515
pubmed: 27196586
AIDS. 2014 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S35-46
pubmed: 24468945
Public Health Action. 2018 Dec 21;8(4):202-210
pubmed: 30775281
J Hepatol. 2005;42 Suppl(1):S108-14
pubmed: 15777565
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jun;34(6):551-67
pubmed: 26748919
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 21;6(1):e16349
pubmed: 21283696
Liver Int. 2019 Oct;39(10):1818-1836
pubmed: 31433902
J Med Econ. 2011;14(2):253-61
pubmed: 21385147
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):45-53
pubmed: 23281975
Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):515-23
pubmed: 24209977
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1081-1088
pubmed: 27394647
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 May;55(5):1550-1556
pubmed: 28275079
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;3(12):819
pubmed: 30507463
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Feb;88:102634
pubmed: 31882272
Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Sep;141(9):1831-9
pubmed: 23114026
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2129-43
pubmed: 23245605
Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):571-83
pubmed: 21802134
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:107-116
pubmed: 28797497
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Feb 1;91(2):102-23
pubmed: 23554523
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 31;364(13):1195-206
pubmed: 21449783
J Clin Virol. 2017 Mar;88:46-51
pubmed: 28160728
J Viral Hepat. 2006 Jan;13(1):34-41
pubmed: 16364080
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Aug 15;33(4):562-9
pubmed: 11462196
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jul 14;9(7):e16863
pubmed: 32673260
Hepatology. 2008 Aug;48(2):418-31
pubmed: 18563841
J Viral Hepat. 2016 Mar;23(3):217-26
pubmed: 26482680
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(11):1-205, iii
pubmed: 17346498
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan;152(1):142-156.e2
pubmed: 27641509