Nomophobia in healthcare: an observational study between nurses and students.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 07 2021
29 07 2021
Historique:
received:
24
03
2021
accepted:
28
06
2021
entrez:
30
7
2021
pubmed:
31
7
2021
medline:
4
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The abuse of technical devices can be considered a form of addiction that is defined in current literature as Nomophobia. The phenomenon appears to be quite widespread among nurses and nursing students, and nomophobic behaviours of professionals can lead to a reduction in the quality of the care provided. The aim of this study is to investigate the situation in a University and in a hospital in northern Italy and evaluate the levels of nomophobia among nurses and students. An observational study was conducted with a questionnaire using a sample of nursing students and nurses. Both of the studies had the common goal of investigating the levels of nomophobia and evaluate the comparison between the two groups. In general, neither nurses nor students seem to demonstrate nomophobia's critical levels. The comparison of the daily use of the smartphone between nurses and students shows that the frequent use of students is balanced by the nurses' daily trend line that progressively decreases. Both nurses and students affirm to use their smartphones at work with a certain frequency although, especially among the students, it is usually for appropriate and justified reasons. It is necessary to consider the development of an educational project that regulates the use of smartphones, explaining the meaning of nomophobia, right from the first year of the University experience so as to correctly address the students' (and future professionals') behaviours to make them aware of the misuse of mobile phones, especially in the clinical setting that can easily cause distractions and consequently irreversible errors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
The abuse of technical devices can be considered a form of addiction that is defined in current literature as Nomophobia. The phenomenon appears to be quite widespread among nurses and nursing students, and nomophobic behaviours of professionals can lead to a reduction in the quality of the care provided. The aim of this study is to investigate the situation in a University and in a hospital in northern Italy and evaluate the levels of nomophobia among nurses and students.
METHODS
An observational study was conducted with a questionnaire using a sample of nursing students and nurses. Both of the studies had the common goal of investigating the levels of nomophobia and evaluate the comparison between the two groups.
RESULTS
In general, neither nurses nor students seem to demonstrate nomophobia's critical levels. The comparison of the daily use of the smartphone between nurses and students shows that the frequent use of students is balanced by the nurses' daily trend line that progressively decreases. Both nurses and students affirm to use their smartphones at work with a certain frequency although, especially among the students, it is usually for appropriate and justified reasons.
CONCLUSIONS
It is necessary to consider the development of an educational project that regulates the use of smartphones, explaining the meaning of nomophobia, right from the first year of the University experience so as to correctly address the students' (and future professionals') behaviours to make them aware of the misuse of mobile phones, especially in the clinical setting that can easily cause distractions and consequently irreversible errors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34328137
doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11505
pmc: PMC8383234
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2021031Références
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2019 Feb;13(1):20-29
pubmed: 30659927
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2010 Mar;23(1):52-4
pubmed: 20299865
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Mar;47(3):342-349
pubmed: 29845021
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 19;17(17):
pubmed: 32824979
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Apr;68(4):888-97
pubmed: 21950615
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 4;12(8):e0182239
pubmed: 28777828
J Addict Nurs. 2017 Oct/Dec;28(4):210-214
pubmed: 29200048
Heliyon. 2020 May 28;6(5):e04084
pubmed: 32490259
Heliyon. 2018 Nov 01;4(11):e00895
pubmed: 30426100
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 22;6(1):e24
pubmed: 29358161
Nurse Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):86-9
pubmed: 18317322
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 27;13(8):e0202953
pubmed: 30148870
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jan;34:79-84
pubmed: 30472531
Crit Care. 2004 Feb;8(1):46-53
pubmed: 14975045
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2015 Jan;3(1):39-43
pubmed: 25587554
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2014 May 16;7:155-60
pubmed: 24876797
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Mar 26;7(7 Spec No):79-92
pubmed: 26153207
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Apr;8(4):1297-1300
pubmed: 31143710