Reforms in medical education: lessons learnt from Kyrgyzstan.
Education, medical
education, medical, continuing
education, medical, graduate
education, medical, undergraduate
health care reform
Journal
Global health action
ISSN: 1654-9880
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Action
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101496665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2021
01 01 2021
Historique:
entrez:
31
7
2021
pubmed:
1
8
2021
medline:
10
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Human resources are one of the six building blocks of a health system. In order to ensure that these resources are adequately trained to meet the evolving needs of populations, medical education reforms are needed. In Kyrgyzstan, like in many other low- and middle-income countries, human resources for health are a key challenge for the health system in both the quantity and having their training aligned with the health system priorities. Here we present the experience of the Medical Education Reform Project, a project aimed at improving the quality of health professionals through reforming medical education, funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, as a collaborative effort between partners in Kyrgyzstan and Switzerland since 2013. We used a qualitative study taking a cooperative inquiry approach with an experiential perspective in order to present the implementation of the Medical Education Reform Project in Kyrgyzstan. In order to look at the different components impacting the reform process, a framework comprising: Setting the direction; Building a consensus; Engaging stakeholders; Pilot projects and evaluation; Capacity building; Timing, and Key partners was used to disentangle the lessons learnt. Champions and partnering with key institutions were essential in building consensus, as was the catalytic and facilitating role the project played. This enabled active engagement of a variety of stakeholders in the reform process using different means of interaction ranging from large roundtable discussions, workshops, trainings and even study tours. Pilot projects and research provided tangible actions that could be used to further the reforms. For capacity building, the project offered a wide range of activities that improved clinical competencies, empowered stakeholders, and strengthened organizational capacity. The timing of this reform process in medical education was facilitated by the overall reforms and policies in the health system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34330184
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1944480
pmc: PMC8330711
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1944480Références
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(6):880-886
pubmed: 29036604
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58
pubmed: 21112623
Can Med Educ J. 2019 Nov 28;10(4):e57-e61
pubmed: 31807227
Fam Med. 2013 Mar;45(3):164-70
pubmed: 23463428
Global Health. 2016 Apr 29;12(1):14
pubmed: 27129684
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Mar;13(2):184-5
pubmed: 25755042
Lancet. 2013 Jun 15;381(9883):2118-33
pubmed: 23574803
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):334
pubmed: 28745589
Global Health. 2016 Jun 02;12(1):29
pubmed: 27255370
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2013 Apr-Jun;28(2):e121-37
pubmed: 23125073
Med Teach. 2018 May;40(5):472-480
pubmed: 29475391