Three-dimensional bladder ultrasound to measure daily urinary bladder volume in hospitalized dogs.
bladder volume
dogs
ultrasound
urine
urine residual volume
Journal
Journal of veterinary internal medicine
ISSN: 1939-1676
Titre abrégé: J Vet Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8708660
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
revised:
10
07
2021
received:
21
12
2020
accepted:
15
07
2021
pubmed:
1
8
2021
medline:
1
10
2021
entrez:
31
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Urinary bladder volume (UBV) and urine residual volume (URV) provide important information for hospitalized dogs and might allow recognition of urine retention. Using 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound to monitor daily URV is a safe and effective way to recognize urinary retention. Twenty-five client-owned hospitalized dogs. Prospective, observational study. UBV and URV were measured using 3D ultrasound daily at approximately the same time. UBV was measured, the dog was taken for a 5-minute controlled leash walk, then URV was estimated. Concurrent use of opioids, anesthetics, and fluids administered IV were recorded. Daily URVs were >0.4 mL/kg in 22 of 25 dogs on at least 1 day of hospitalization. Seventeen of 25 dogs had an abnormal URV at the time of discharge. Of 18 dogs that were anesthetized while hospitalized, 16 had a URV >0.4 mL/kg with a mean of 4.34 mL/kg (range, 0.5-13.4 mL/kg). No statistical difference in degree of URV was found based on the use of anesthesia, administration of fluids IV, or opioids. Weight was significantly associated with URV; dogs <10 kg had a higher URV per unit mass than dogs >10 kg (P = .001). Use of a 3D ultrasound device to measure daily UBV and URV in hospitalized dogs provides a safe estimate of bladder volume in real-time. Monitoring daily URV might help in early identification of patients that are retaining urine, thereby preventing potential adverse effects of urethral catheterization or prolonged urinary retention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Urinary bladder volume (UBV) and urine residual volume (URV) provide important information for hospitalized dogs and might allow recognition of urine retention.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Using 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound to monitor daily URV is a safe and effective way to recognize urinary retention.
ANIMALS
METHODS
Twenty-five client-owned hospitalized dogs.
METHODS
METHODS
Prospective, observational study. UBV and URV were measured using 3D ultrasound daily at approximately the same time. UBV was measured, the dog was taken for a 5-minute controlled leash walk, then URV was estimated. Concurrent use of opioids, anesthetics, and fluids administered IV were recorded.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Daily URVs were >0.4 mL/kg in 22 of 25 dogs on at least 1 day of hospitalization. Seventeen of 25 dogs had an abnormal URV at the time of discharge. Of 18 dogs that were anesthetized while hospitalized, 16 had a URV >0.4 mL/kg with a mean of 4.34 mL/kg (range, 0.5-13.4 mL/kg). No statistical difference in degree of URV was found based on the use of anesthesia, administration of fluids IV, or opioids. Weight was significantly associated with URV; dogs <10 kg had a higher URV per unit mass than dogs >10 kg (P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE
CONCLUSIONS
Use of a 3D ultrasound device to measure daily UBV and URV in hospitalized dogs provides a safe estimate of bladder volume in real-time. Monitoring daily URV might help in early identification of patients that are retaining urine, thereby preventing potential adverse effects of urethral catheterization or prolonged urinary retention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34331488
doi: 10.1111/jvim.16232
pmc: PMC8478037
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study, Veterinary
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2256-2262Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.
Références
Res Vet Sci. 1999 Dec;67(3):295-9
pubmed: 10607511
Urology. 2008 Jul;72(1):24-8
pubmed: 18400276
J Vet Intern Med. 2020 Jul;34(4):1488-1495
pubmed: 32463540
J Ultrasound Med. 1996 Sep;15(9):627-32
pubmed: 8866444
Can Vet J. 1998 Oct;39(10):650-2
pubmed: 9789679
Nurs Res. 2014 Nov-Dec;63(6):418-25
pubmed: 25350541
Bladder (San Franc). 2018;5(1):
pubmed: 29354653
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Feb;22(3-4):347-55
pubmed: 22931456
Drug Saf. 1998 Jul;19(1):45-55
pubmed: 9673857
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;48(3):258-61
pubmed: 19797016
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004 Jun 15;224(12):1936-40
pubmed: 15230447
J Small Anim Pract. 1999 Apr;40(4):177-9
pubmed: 10340248
J Vet Intern Med. 2021 Sep;35(5):2256-2262
pubmed: 34331488
Drug Saf. 2008;31(5):373-88
pubmed: 18422378
J Vet Intern Med. 2020 Nov;34(6):2460-2467
pubmed: 33156977
Anesth Analg. 1999 Jul;89(1):90-7
pubmed: 10389784
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jan;81(1):18-21
pubmed: 10638870
Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1139-57
pubmed: 19352147
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Sep 15;231(6):893-9
pubmed: 17867973
Res Vet Sci. 1999 Jun;66(3):175-7
pubmed: 10333455
Vet Surg. 2008 Dec;37(8):791-800
pubmed: 19121176
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2003 Oct;30(4):257-64
pubmed: 12925183
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1981 May 1;178(9):989-91
pubmed: 7240019