Evaluation of the solubility of a range of copper sources and the effects of iron & sulphur on copper solubility under rumen simulated conditions.

Bioavailability Copper antagonism Ruminant Supplementation

Journal

Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS)
ISSN: 1878-3252
Titre abrégé: J Trace Elem Med Biol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9508274

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 30 11 2020
revised: 13 05 2021
accepted: 03 07 2021
pubmed: 2 8 2021
medline: 17 2 2022
entrez: 1 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Antagonisms exist in vivo which inhibit copper bioavailability in ruminants. Although the antagonism between iron, sulphur and copper has been well observed in vivo in practice the mechanism by which it acts has not yet been elucidated, nor the compound it creates identified. This results in problems when trying to optimise supplementation to prevent the interaction from occurring or provide a copper source which is able to negate its effects. This work aims to establish if the antagonism between sulphur, iron and copper could be elicited under in vitro rumen replicated conditions and using a range of copper sources to investigate any differences in their participation in the interaction. Rumen simulated conditions were used to test solubility as a proxy for bioavailability of different copper sources. Sources from ionic, hydroxy and organic compounds were tested in de-ionised water and warmed, strained rumen fluid which mimicked duration, agitation, temperature and pH of the rumen. All copper sources were less soluble in rumen fluid than in de-ionised water. The addition of sulphide, alone or as part of a sulphur mix with sulphate produced a pronounced reduction in solubility on each of the copper sources. The most soluble were the greatest affected. There was no indication that an in insoluble compound containing copper and iron was formed under these conditions. The intricacy of the in vivo rumen is required to elicit the reaction between copper, iron and sulphur.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Antagonisms exist in vivo which inhibit copper bioavailability in ruminants. Although the antagonism between iron, sulphur and copper has been well observed in vivo in practice the mechanism by which it acts has not yet been elucidated, nor the compound it creates identified. This results in problems when trying to optimise supplementation to prevent the interaction from occurring or provide a copper source which is able to negate its effects. This work aims to establish if the antagonism between sulphur, iron and copper could be elicited under in vitro rumen replicated conditions and using a range of copper sources to investigate any differences in their participation in the interaction.
METHODS METHODS
Rumen simulated conditions were used to test solubility as a proxy for bioavailability of different copper sources. Sources from ionic, hydroxy and organic compounds were tested in de-ionised water and warmed, strained rumen fluid which mimicked duration, agitation, temperature and pH of the rumen.
RESULTS RESULTS
All copper sources were less soluble in rumen fluid than in de-ionised water. The addition of sulphide, alone or as part of a sulphur mix with sulphate produced a pronounced reduction in solubility on each of the copper sources. The most soluble were the greatest affected.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
There was no indication that an in insoluble compound containing copper and iron was formed under these conditions. The intricacy of the in vivo rumen is required to elicit the reaction between copper, iron and sulphur.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34333361
pii: S0946-672X(21)00105-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2021.126815
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Water 059QF0KO0R
Sulfur 70FD1KFU70
Copper 789U1901C5
Iron E1UOL152H7

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

126815

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Andrea H Clarkson (AH)

School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK. Electronic address: andrea.clarkson@nottingham.ac.uk.

Stuart W Paine (SW)

School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.

Nigel R Kendall (NR)

School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH