How CO
BRICS
CO2 emission. Environmental quality
Digitalization
Government size
Journal
Environmental science and pollution research international
ISSN: 1614-7499
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9441769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
06
06
2021
accepted:
24
07
2021
pubmed:
2
8
2021
medline:
6
1
2022
entrez:
1
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The role of government size and digitization in the process of environmental quality is a matter of considerable debate in the field of environmental economics. BRICS economies have suffered from environmental pollution. This paper scrutinizes that how CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 34333752
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15693-6
pii: 10.1007/s11356-021-15693-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Dioxide
142M471B3J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
457-467Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Acaravci A, Ozturk I (2010) On the relationship between energy consumption, CO
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.009
Adewuyi AO (2016) Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 65:489–506
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.090
Ahmed K, Rehman MU, Ozturk I (2017) What drives carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run? Evidence from selected South Asian Countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:1142–1153
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.018
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2016) The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: the role of energy prices. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1622–1631
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.131
Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026
Aslam B, Hu J, Hafeez M, Ma D, AlGarni TS, Saeed M, Abdullah MA, Hussain S (2021) Applying environmental Kuznets curve framework to assess the nexus of industry, globalization, and CO
doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101377
Baloch MA, Wang B (2019) Analyzing the role of governance in CO
doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.08.007
Barro RJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 106(2):407–443
doi: 10.2307/2937943
Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100(2):223–251
doi: 10.1086/261816
Beck S, Mahony M (2018) The IPCC and the new map of science and politics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 9(6):e547
Bernauer T, & Koubi V (2006). States as providers of public goods: how does government size affect environmental quality?. Available at SSRN 900487.
Carlsson F, & Lundström S (2001). Political and economic freedom and the environment: the case of CO
Cheikh NB, Zaied YB, Chevallier J (2021) On the nonlinear relationship between energy use and CO
doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101331
Danish, Ozcan B, Ulucak R (2021) An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO
doi: 10.1016/j.net.2020.12.008
Farzanegan MR, Markwardt G (2018) Development and pollution in the Middle East and North Africa: democracy matters. J Policy Model 40(2):350–374
doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.01.010
Fölster S, Henrekson M (2001) Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries. Eur Econ Rev 45(8):1501–1520
doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00083-0
Frederik C, & Lundström S (2001). Political and economic freedom and the environment: the case of CO
Galinato GI, Islam A (2017) The challenge of addressing consumption pollutants with fiscal policy. Environ Dev Econ 22(5):624–647
doi: 10.1017/S1355770X17000237
Godil DI, Sharif A, Ali MI, Ozturk I, Usman R (2021) The role of financial development, R&D expenditure, globalization and institutional quality in energy consumption in India: New evidence from the QARDL approach. J Environ Manag 285:112208
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112208
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377
doi: 10.2307/2118443
Habibi F, Zabardast MA (2020) Digitalization, education and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Middle East and OECD countries. Technol Soc 63:101370
doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101370
Hafeez M, Yuan C, Khelfaoui I, Sultan Musaad OA, Waqas Akbar M, Jie L (2019) Evaluating the energy consumption inequalities in the one belt and one road region: implications for the environment. Energies 12(7):1358
doi: 10.3390/en12071358
Hafeez M, Yuan C, Shah WUH, Mahmood MT, Li X, Iqbal K (2020) Evaluating the relationship among agriculture, energy demand, finance and environmental degradation in one belt and one road economies. Carbon Manag 11(2):139–154
doi: 10.1080/17583004.2020.1721974
Hakkio CS, Rush M (1991) Cointegration: how short is the long run? J Int Money Financ 10(4):571–581
doi: 10.1016/0261-5606(91)90008-8
Halkos GE, Paizanos EΑ (2013) The effect of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation. Ecol Econ 91:48–56
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.002
Halkos GE, Paizanos EΑ (2016) The effects of fiscal policy on CO
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.035
Han C, Zhang B, Chen H, Wei Z, Liu Y (2019) Spatially distributed crop model based on remote sensing. Agric Water Manag 218:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.035
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.035
Han X, Wei Z, Zhang B, Li Y, Du T et al (2021) Crop evapotranspiration prediction by considering dynamic change of crop coefficient and the precipitation effect in back-propagation neural network model. J Hydrol (Amsterdam) 596:126104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126104
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126104
He X, Zhang T, Xue Q, Zhou Y, Wang H, Bolan NS, Jiang R, Tsang DCW (2021) Enhanced adsorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution by polyethyleneimine modified straw hydrochar. Sci Total Environ 778:146116–146116
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146116
Houghton JW (2015) ICT, The Environment, and Climate Change. Int Encycl Digital Commun Soc 76:39–60
Islam AM, & López RE (2013). Government spending and air pollution in the US (No. 1667-2016-136314).
Khan M, Ozturk I (2021) Examining the direct and indirect effects of financial development on CO
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112812
Kotera G, Okada K, Samreth S (2012) Government size, democracy, and corruption: An empirical investigation. Econ Model 29(6):2340–2348
doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.06.022
Lange S, Pohl J, Santarius T (2020) Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand? Ecol Econ 176:106760
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106760
Lashkarizadeh M, Salatin P (2012) The Effects of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) on Air Pollution. Elixir Pollut 46:8058–8064
Li J, Wang F, He Y (2020) Electric Vehicle Routing Problem with Battery Swapping Considering Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland) 12(24):10537. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410537
doi: 10.3390/su122410537
Lopez RE, & Palacios A (2010). Have government spending and energy tax policies contributed to make Europe environmentally cleaner? (No. 1667-2016-136345).
López R, Galinato GI, Islam A (2011) Fiscal spending and the environment: theory and empirics. J Environ Econ Manag 62(2):180–198
doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.03.001
Lu, W. C. (2018). The Impacts of Information and Communication Technology, Energy Consumption, Financial Development, and Economic Growth on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in 12 Asian Countries. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang., 1-15.
Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–437
Martynenko TS, Vershinina IA (2018) Digital economy: The possibility of sustainable development and overcoming social and environmental inequality in Russia. Revista Espacios 39(44)
Murshed M, Nurmakhanova M, Elheddad M, Ahmed R (2020) Value addition in the services sector and its heterogeneous impacts on CO 2 emissions: revisiting the EKC hypothesis for the OPEC using panel spatial estimation techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(31):38951–38973
doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09593-4
Murshed M, Alam R, Ansarin A (2021) The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Bangladesh: the importance of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and hydropower consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(14):17208–17227
doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11976-6
Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37(17):1979–1990
OECD (2010). Greener and Smarter: ICTs, The Environment and Climate Change. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at www.oecd.org/ site/stitff/45983022.
Olaoye OO, Eluwole OO, Ayesha A, Afolabi OO (2020) Government spending and economic growth in ECOWAS: An asymmetric analysis. J Econ Asymmetries 22:e00180
doi: 10.1016/j.jeca.2020.e00180
Ozcan B, Apergis N (2018) The Impact of Internet Use on Air Pollution: Evidence from Emerging Countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(5):4174–4189
doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0825-1
Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.005
Ozturk I, Salah Uddin G (2012) Causality among carbon emissions, energy consumption and growth in India. Econ Res-Ekonomska istraživanja 25(3):752–775
doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2012.11517532
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326
doi: 10.1002/jae.616
Plepys A (2002) The Grey Side of ICT. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22(5):509–523
doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00025-2
Qian Y, Liu J, Cheng Z, & Forrest JYL (2021). Does the smart city policy promote the green growth of the urban economy? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-15.
Qin L, Raheem S, Murshed M, Miao X, Khan Z, & Kirikkaleli D (2021). Does financial inclusion limit carbon dioxide emissions? Analyzing the role of globalization and renewable electricity output. Sustain Dev.
Quan Q, Gao S, Shang Y, Wang B (2021) Assessment of the sustainability of Gymnocypris eckloni habitat under river damming in the source region of the Yellow River. Sci Total Environ 778:146312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146312
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146312
Rao PK (2010) The architecture of green economic policies. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
Rehman A, Ma H, Ahmad M, Ozturk I, & Işık C (2021a). Estimating the connection of information technology, foreign direct investment, trade, renewable energy and economic progress in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL approach and cointegrating regression analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-13.
Rehman, A., Ma, H., Ozturk, I., Murshed, M., & Dagar, V. (2021b). The dynamic impacts of CO
Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I (2016) The Effects of Internet Usage and Economic Growth on CO
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.018
Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I, Sohag K (2018) The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.009
Shaheen A, Sheng J, Arshad S, Salam S, Hafeez M (2020a) The Dynamic Linkage between Income, Energy Consumption, Urbanization and Carbon Emissions in Pakistan. Pol J Environ Stud 29(1):267–276. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/95033
doi: 10.15244/pjoes/95033
Shaheen A, Sheng J, Arshad S, Muhammad H, Salam S (2020b) Forecasting the determinants of environmental degradation: a gray modeling approach. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects:1–21
Shvakov EE, Petrova EA (2019) Newest trends and future scenarios for a sustainable digital economy development. In: In Institute of Scientific Communications Conference. Springer, Cham, pp 1378–1385
Solow RM (1994) Perspectives on growth theory. J Econ Perspect 8(1):45–54
doi: 10.1257/jep.8.1.45
Su CW, Xie Y, Shahab S, Faisal C, Nadeem M, Hafeez M, Qamri GM (2021) Towards achieving sustainable development: Role of technology innovation, technology adoption and CO
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010277
Sui DZ, Rejeski DW (2002) Environmental impacts of the emerging digital economy: the e-for-environment e-commerce? Environ Manag 29(2):155–163
doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0027-X
Sun G, Yuan C, Hafeez M, Raza S, Jie L, Liu X (2020) Does regional energy consumption disparities assist to control environmental degradation in OBOR: an entropy approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(7):7105–7119
doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07360-8
Ullah S, Apergis N, Usman A, Chishti MZ (2020a) Asymmetric effects of inflation instability and GDP growth volatility on environmental quality in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–13
Ullah S, Ozturk I, Sohail S (2020b) The asymmetric effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on Pakistan’s environmental pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–12
Usman A, Ozturk I, Hassan A, Zafar SM, Ullah S (2021) The effect of ICT on energy consumption and economic growth in South Asian economies: an empirical analysis. Telematics Inform 58:101537
doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101537
Vogler, J., & Jordan, A. (2003). Governance and the environment. Negotiating Environmental Change: New Perspectives from Social Science, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 137-58.
Wu Y, Luo C, Luo L (2021) The impact of the development of the digital economy on Sulfur Dioxide emissions: Empirical evidence based on provincial panel data. J Wuhan Polytech 20:82–88
Yuelan P, Akbar MW, Hafeez M, Ahmad M, Zia Z, Ullah S (2019) The nexus of fiscal policy instruments and environmental degradation in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(28):28919–28932
doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06071-4
Zhang C, Liu C (2015) The Impact of ICT Industry on CO
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.011
Zhang B, Xu D, Liu Y, Li F, Cai J et al (2016) Multi-scale evapotranspiration of summer maize and the controlling meteorological factors in north China. Agric For Meteorol 216:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.015
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.015
Zhang J, Wang M, Tang Y, Ding Q, Wanga C, Huang X,... Yan F (2021). Angular Velocity Measurement with Improved Scale Factor Based on a Wideband-tunable Optoelectronic Oscillator. IEEE Trans Instrum Measur 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3067183
Zimmerman R (2005) Mass transit infrastructure and urban health. J Urban Health 82(1):21–32
doi: 10.1093/jurban/jti005