Is thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate equally safe and effective in elderly patients? A propensity score matched analysis of early perioperative and functional outcomes.
Vapoenucleación prostática con láser Tulio. ¿Es igual de segura y efectiva en pacientes ancianos? Análisis por puntuación de propensión de los resultados funcionales y perioperatorios tempranos.
Ancianos frágiles
Frail Elderly
Hiperplasia prostática
Laser Therapy
Prostate
Prostatic Hyperplasia
Próstata
Resección transuretral de próstata
Terapia láser
Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
Journal
Actas urologicas espanolas
ISSN: 2173-5786
Titre abrégé: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101771154
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jul 2021
29 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
01
07
2020
revised:
10
09
2020
accepted:
22
09
2020
entrez:
2
8
2021
pubmed:
3
8
2021
medline:
3
8
2021
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To evaluate if thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) is equally safe and effective in a selected cohort of elderly patients when compared to "younger" patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent ThuVEP between September 2018 and February 2020. After application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, patients were stratified according to the 75 years-old cut-off point suggested by the WHO. Group A included patients < 75 years-old; Group B included patients > 75 years-old. Preoperative assessment included urological consultation, prostate specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life index, transrectal ultrasound to estimate prostate volume (PVol), and uroflowmetry to assess preoperative Qmax, Qave and post-void residual volume (PVR). Perioperative and postoperative data were analyzed during 3-month follow-up. After propensity-score analysis, 51 versus 51 patients were 1:1 matched according to PVol, PSA, Qmax, IPSS and QoL. Patients were comparable at baseline excluding age (65 (IQR 59-70) versus 79 (IQR 77-82) years, Group A versus B, respectively, p-value < 0.001). No differences were found in terms of hemoglobin drop, complications rate, catheterization time and length of hospital stay. Group A (younger) patients had more significant improvement in 30-days absolute Qmax, Qave and ΔQmax. At 90-days follow-up, the differences between the groups disappeared. Within the 90-days follow-up, no significant differences were found in the readmission rate, with no need of reinterventions. In our hands, even in elderly patients affected by BPH, ThuVEP appears to be a safe and effective treatment option.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34334243
pii: S0210-4806(21)00091-7
doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.09.015
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
spa
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 AEU. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.