The cepstral spectral index of dysphonia, the acoustic voice quality index and the acoustic breathiness index as novel multiparametric indices for acoustic assessment of voice quality.
Journal
Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery
ISSN: 1531-6998
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9417024
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2021
01 Dec 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
3
8
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
2
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective assessment of voice quality using acoustic measures is an important pillar of voice diagnostics. This article reviews three recent acoustic measures and their clinical use in phoniatrics and laryngology. Two acoustic parameters, the cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (CSID) and the acoustic voice quality index (AVQI), have gained importance as validated multiparametric indices in the objective assessment of hoarseness because they include both continuous speech and sustained vowels. The acoustic breathiness index (ABI), another multiparametric index, assesses breathiness admixture during phonation and identifies it robustly, unaffected by other characteristics of dysphonia such as roughness. Acoustic measurements are useful diagnostic tools when used correctly with an appropriate recording system, consideration of environment and use of software programs. CSID, AVQI and ABI objectively improve the detection of voice quality abnormalities. In addition to their proven validity, their application is simple and their usability for clinicians is high.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34334615
doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000743
pii: 00020840-202112000-00004
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
451-457Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Références
Patel RR, Awan SN, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, et al. Recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association expert panel to develop a protocol for instrumental assessment of vocal function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2018; 27:887–905.
Pabon P, Ternström S. Feature maps of the acoustic spectrum of the voice. J Voice 2020; 34:161e1-161.e26.
Narasimhan SV, Rashmi R. Multiparameter voice assessment in dysphonics: correlation between objective and perceptual parameters. J Voice 2020; [Epub ahead of print].
Englert M, Mendoza V, Behlau M, et al. GALP qualifier scale: initial considerations to classify a voice problem. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2020; 72:402–410.
Maryn Y, Roy N, De Bodt M, et al. Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: a meta-analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 2009; 126:2619–2634.
Barsties v, Latoszek B, Maryn Y, Gerrits E, et al. A Meta-analysis: acoustic measurement of roughness and breathiness. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2018; 61:298–323.
Englert M, Lima L, Barsties v, Latoszek B, et al. Influence of the voice sample length in perceptual and acoustic voice quality analysis. J Voice 2020; [Epub ahead of print].
Sampaio M, Vaz Masson ML, de Paula Soares MF, et al. Effects of fundamental frequency, vocal intensity, sample duration, and vowel context in cepstral and spectral measures of dysphonic voices. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2020; 63:1326–1339.
Englert M, Lima L, Constantini AC, et al. Acoustic voice quality index - AVQI for Brazilian Portuguese speakers: analysis of different speech material. Codas 2019; 31:e20180082.
Englert M, Lima L, Behlau M. Acoustic voice quality index and acoustic breathiness index: analysis with different speech material in the Brazilian Portuguese. J Voice 2020; 34:810e11-810.e17.
Bottalico P, Codino J, Cantor-Cutiva LC, et al. Reproducibility of voice parameters: the effect of room acoustics and microphones. J Voice 2020; 34:320–334.
Sampaio MC, Bohlender JE, Brockmann-Bauser M. Fundamental frequency and intensity effects on cepstral measures in vowels from connected speech of speakers with voice disorders. J Voice 2021; 35:422–431.
Lovato A, De Colle W, Giacomelli L, et al. Multidimensional voice program (MDVP) vs Praat for assessing euphonic subjects: a preliminary study on the gender-discriminating power of acoustic analysis software. J Voice 2016; 30:765e1-765.e5.
Murton O, Hillman R, Mehta D. Cepstral peak prominence values for clinical voice evaluation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2020; 29:1596–1607.
Mizuta M, Abe C, Taguchi E, et al. Validation of cepstral acoustic analysis for normal and pathological voice in the Japanese language. J Voice 2020; [Epub ahead of print].
Lee Y, Kim G, Kwon S. The usefulness of auditory perceptual assessment and acoustic analysis for classifying the voice severity. J Voice 2020; 34:884–893.
Englert M, Lopes L, Vieira V, et al. Accuracy of acoustic voice quality index and its isolated acoustic measures to discriminate the severity of voice disorders. J Voice 2020; [Epub ahead of print].
Barsties v. Latoszek B, Englert M, Lucero JC, et al. The performance of the acoustic voice quality index and acoustic breathiness index in synthesized voices. J Voice 2021. [Epub ahead of print].
Stappenbeck L, Barsties v, Latoszek B, Janotte B, et al. Acoustic voice quality index and acoustic breathiness index as two examples for strengths and weaknesses of free software in medicine. Biomed Signal Process Control 2020; 59:101938.
Englert M, Barsties v, Latoszek B, Behlau M. The impact of languages and cultural backgrounds on voice quality analyses. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2021; [Epub ahead of print].
Barsties v, Latoszek B, Ulozaite-Staniene N, Maryn Y, et al. The influence of gender and age on the acoustic voice quality index and dysphonia severity index: a normative study. J Voice 2019; 33:340–345.
Jayakumar T, Benoy JJ, Yasin HM. Effect of age and gender on acoustic voice quality index across lifespan: a cross-sectional study in Indian population. J Voice 2020; [Epub ahead of print].
Barsties v, Latoszek B, Ulozaite-Staniene N, Petrauskas T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dysphonia classification of DSI and AVQI. Laryngoscope 2019; 129:692–698.
Ulozaite-Staniene N, Petrauskas T, Šaferis V, et al. Exploring the feasibility of the combination of acoustic voice quality index and glottal function index for voice pathology screening. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276:1737–1745.
Pommée T, Maryn Y, Finck C, et al. The acoustic voice quality index, version 03.01, in French and the voice handicap index. J Voice 2020; 34:646e1-646.e10.
Lee JM, Roy N, Peterson E, et al. Comparison of two multiparameter acoustic indices of dysphonia severity: the acoustic voice quality index and cepstral spectral index of dysphonia. J Voice 2018; 32:515e1-515.e13.
Barsties v, Latoszek B, Kim GH, Delgado Hernández J, et al. The validity of the acoustic breathiness index in the evaluation of breathy voice quality: a meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 2021; 46:31–40.
Hosokawa K, Barsties v, Latoszek B, Ferrer-Riesgo CA, et al. Acoustic breathiness index for the Japanese-speaking population: validation study and exploration of affecting factors. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2019; 62:2617–2631.