Liver Venous Deprivation or Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy?: A Retrospective Multicentric Study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
/ therapy
Embolization, Therapeutic
/ methods
Feasibility Studies
Female
Hepatectomy
/ methods
Hepatic Veins
/ surgery
Humans
Intention to Treat Analysis
/ methods
Ligation
/ methods
Liver Neoplasms
/ therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Portal Vein
/ surgery
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Journal
Annals of surgery
ISSN: 1528-1140
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372354
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2021
01 11 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
3
8
2021
medline:
23
11
2021
entrez:
2
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare 2 techniques of remnant liver hypertrophy in candidates for extended hepatectomy: radiological simultaneous portal vein embolization and hepatic vein embolization (HVE); namely LVD, and ALPPS. Recent advances in chemotherapy and surgical techniques have widened indications for extended hepatectomy, before which remnant liver augmentation is mandatory. ALPPS and LVD typically show higher hypertrophy rates than portal vein embolization, but their respective places in patient management remain unclear. All consecutive ALPPS and LVD procedures performed in 8 French centers between 2011 and 2020 were included. The main endpoint was the successful resection rate (resection rate without 90-day mortality) analyzed according to an intention-to-treat principle. Secondary endpoints were hypertrophy rates, intra and postoperative outcomes. Among 209 patients, 124 had LVD 37 [13,1015] days before surgery, whereas 85 underwent ALPPS with an inter-stages period of 10 [6, 69] days. ALPPS was mostly-performed for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), LVD for CRLM and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hypertrophy was faster for ALPPS. Successful resection rates were 72.6% for LVD ± rescue ALPPS (n = 6) versus 90.6% for ALPPS (P < 0.001). Operative duration, blood losses and length-of-stay were lower for LVD, whereas 90-day major complications and mortality were comparable. Results were globally unchanged for CRLM patients, or after excluding the early 2 years of experience (learning-curve effect). This study is the first 1 comparing LVD versus ALPPS in the largest cohort so far. Despite its retrospective design, it yields original results that may serve as the basis for a prospective study.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
To compare 2 techniques of remnant liver hypertrophy in candidates for extended hepatectomy: radiological simultaneous portal vein embolization and hepatic vein embolization (HVE); namely LVD, and ALPPS.
BACKGROUND
Recent advances in chemotherapy and surgical techniques have widened indications for extended hepatectomy, before which remnant liver augmentation is mandatory. ALPPS and LVD typically show higher hypertrophy rates than portal vein embolization, but their respective places in patient management remain unclear.
METHODS
All consecutive ALPPS and LVD procedures performed in 8 French centers between 2011 and 2020 were included. The main endpoint was the successful resection rate (resection rate without 90-day mortality) analyzed according to an intention-to-treat principle. Secondary endpoints were hypertrophy rates, intra and postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS
Among 209 patients, 124 had LVD 37 [13,1015] days before surgery, whereas 85 underwent ALPPS with an inter-stages period of 10 [6, 69] days. ALPPS was mostly-performed for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), LVD for CRLM and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hypertrophy was faster for ALPPS. Successful resection rates were 72.6% for LVD ± rescue ALPPS (n = 6) versus 90.6% for ALPPS (P < 0.001). Operative duration, blood losses and length-of-stay were lower for LVD, whereas 90-day major complications and mortality were comparable. Results were globally unchanged for CRLM patients, or after excluding the early 2 years of experience (learning-curve effect).
CONCLUSIONS
This study is the first 1 comparing LVD versus ALPPS in the largest cohort so far. Despite its retrospective design, it yields original results that may serve as the basis for a prospective study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34334642
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005121
pii: 00000658-202111000-00027
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
874-880Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Skrzypczyk C, Truant S, Duhamel A, et al. Relevance of the ISGLS definition of posthepatectomy liver failure in early prediction of poor outcome after liver resection. Ann Surg 2014; 260:865–870.
Wicherts DA, Miller R, de Haas RJ, et al. Long-term results of two-stage hepatectomy for irresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Surg 2008; 248:994–1005.
Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, et al. Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 2012; 255:405–414.
Truant S, Scatton O, Dokmak S, et al. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): impact of the inter-stages course on morbi-mortality and implications for management. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41:674–682.
Schadde E, Ardiles V, Robles-Campos R, et al. Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the International ALPPS registry. Ann Surg 2014; 260:828–829.
Lang H, De Santibañes E, Schlitt HJ, et al. 10th anniversary of ALPPS – lessons learned and quo Vadis. Ann Surg 2019; 269:114–119.
Oldhafer KJ, Stavrou GA, Van Gulik TM, et al. ALPPS – where do we stand, where do we go? Eight recommendations from the first international expert meeting. Ann Surg 2016; 263:839–841.
Linecker M, Björnsson B, Stavrou GA, et al. Risk adjustment in ALPPS is associated with a dramatic decrease in early mortality and morbidity. Ann Surg 2017; 266:779–786.
Linecker M, Stavrou GA, Oldhafer KJ, et al. The ALPPS risk score: avoiding futile use of ALPPS. Ann Surg 2016; 264:763–771.
Maulat C, Philis A, Charriere B, et al. Rescue associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy after portal embolization: our experience and literature review. World J Clin Oncol 2017; 8:351.
Tschuor C, Croome KP, Sergeant G, et al. Salvage parenchymal liver transection for patients with insufficient volume increase after portal vein occlusion – an extension of the ALPPS approach. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39:1230–1235.
Guiu B, Chevallier P, Denys A, et al. Simultaneous trans-hepatic portal and hepatic vein embolization before major hepatectomy: the liver venous deprivation technique. Eur Radiol 2016; 26:4259–4267.
Guiu B, Quenet F, Panaro F, et al. Liver venous deprivation versus portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy: future liver remnant volumetric and functional changes. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2020; 9:564–576.
Guiu B, Quenet F, Escal L, et al. Extended liver venous deprivation before major hepatectomy induces marked and very rapid increase in future liver remnant function. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:3343–3352.
Deshayes E, Schadde E, Piron L, et al. Extended liver venous deprivation leads to a higher increase in liver function that ALPPS in early assessment: a comment to “Sparrelid, E. et al. Dynamic evaluation of liver volume and function in associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (2017)”. J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 21:1754–1755.
Laurent C, Fernandez B, Marichez A, et al. Radiological simultaneous portohepatic vein embolization (RASPE) before major hepatectomy: a better way to optimize liver hypertrophy compared to portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 2020; 272:199–205.
Madoff DC, Odisio BC, Schadde E, et al. Improving the safety of major resection for hepatobiliary malignancy: portal vein embolization and recent innovations in liver regeneration strategies. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:59.
Truant S, El Amrani M, Baillet C, et al. Laparoscopic partial ALPPS: much better than ALPPS!. Ann Hepatol 2019; 18:269–273.
Truant S, Bouras AF, Petrovai G, et al. Volumetric gain of the liver after major hepatectomy in obese patients: a case-matched study in 84 patients. Ann Surg 2013; 258:694–696.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240:205–213.
Cai X, Tong Y, Yu H, et al. The ALPPS in the treatment of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis: a single-center study and literature review. Surg Innov 2017; 24:358–364.
Petrowsky H, Linecker M, Raptis DA, et al. First long-term oncologic results of the ALPPS procedure in a large cohort of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 2020; 272:793–800.
Esposito F, Lim C, Lahat E, et al. Combined hepatic and portal vein embolization as preparation for major hepatectomy: a systematic review. HPB 2019; 21:1099–1106.
Alvarez FA, Castaing D, Figueroa R, et al. Natural history of portal vein embolization before liver resection: a 23-year analysis of intention-to-treat results. Surgery 2018; 163:1257–1263.
Hoekstra LT, van Lienden KP, Doets A, et al. Tumor progression after preoperative portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 2012; 256:812–818.
Kikuchi Y, Hiroshima Y, Matsuo K, et al. Remnant liver tumor growth activity during treatment associating liver partition and portal vein occlusion for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 21:1851–1858.
Kambakamba P, Linecker M, Schneider M, et al. Impact of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) on growth of colorectal liver metastases. Surgery 2018; 163:311–317.
Zhang J, Steib CJ. New evidence for liver venous deprivation: safety and feasibility for extended liver resections. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8:1259–11259.
Tomassini F, D’Asseler Y, Linecker M, et al. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy and kinetic growth rate predict liver failure after ALPPS: a multi-institutional study. HPB 2020; 22:1420–1428.
Olthof PB, Tomassini F, Huespe PE, et al. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy to evaluate liver function in associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: liver volume overestimates liver function. Surgery 2017; 162:775–783.
Sandström P, Røsok BI, Sparrelid E, et al. ALPPS improves resectability compared with conventional two-stage hepatectomy in patients with advanced colorectal liver metastasis: results from a Scandinavian multicenter randomized controlled trial (LIGRO trial). Ann Surg 2018; 267:833–840.
Hasselgren K, Ingvald Rosok B, Larsen PN, et al. ALPPS improves survival compared with TSH in patients affected of CRLM: survival analysis from the randomized controlled trial LIGRO. Ann Surg 2021; 273:442–448.