Contemporary Review on Craniectomy and Cranioplasty; Part 2: Material Selection and Plate Manufacture.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2022
01 May 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
3
8
2021
medline:
24
6
2022
entrez:
2
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cranioplasty materials include metals (ie, titanium); ceramics (ie, hydroxyapatite); polymers (ie, poly-methyl-metha-acrylate [PMMA]); and plastics (ie, polyether ether ketone). This paper aims to review their advantages and drawbacks. No ideal material currently exist, however, titanium implants are universally agreed to have lower infection rates than those reported for hydroxyapatite and PMMA implants; thus justifying their current wide use. These implants can be manufactured conventionally from medical grade titanium alloy Ti64 (titanium-aluminum-vanadium) in the form of plates ranging in thickness from 0.5 to 0.7 mm thick, or following the computer-aided design/manufacture principle. Surface finish of these implants is best achieved by electroplating.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34334754
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008040
pii: 00001665-900000000-92326
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Hydroxyapatites
0
Polymethyl Methacrylate
9011-14-7
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
842-845Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Honeybul S, Ho KM. Long-term complications of decompressive craniectomy for head injury. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28:929–935.
Hammon WM, Kempe LG. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty: 13 years experience with 417 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1971; 25:69–77.
Di Stefano C, Sturiale C, Trentini P, et al. Unexpected neuropsychological improvement after cranioplasty: a case series study. Br J Neurosurg 2012; 26:827–831.
Sarov M, Guichard JP, Chibarro S, et al. Sinking skin flap syndrome and paradoxical herniation after hemicraniectomy for malignant hemispheric infarction. Stroke 2010; 41:560–562.
Goldstein JA, Paliga JT, Bartlett SP. Cranioplasty: indications and advances. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 21:400–409.
Cabraja M, Klein M, Lehmann TN. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 26:E101-6.
Josan VA, Sgouros S, Walsh A, et al. Cranioplasty in children. Childs Nerv Syst 2005; 21:200–204.
Lee C, Antonyshyn OM, Forrest CR. Cranioplasty: indications, technique, and early results of autogenous split skull cranial vault reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1995; 23:133–142.
Eppley BL, Kilgo M, Coleman JJ III. Cranial reconstruction with computer-generated hard-tissue replacement patient-matched implants: indications, surgical technique, and long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109:864–871.
Manson PN, Crawley WA, Hoopes JE. Frontal cranioplasty: risk factors and choice of cranial vault reconstructive material. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77:888–904.
Rish BL, Dillon JD, Meirowsky AM, et al. Cranioplasty: a review of 1030 cases of penetrating head injury. Neurosurgery 1979; 4:381–385.
Lee B, Bickel K, Levin S. Microsurgical reconstruction of extensive scalp defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 1999; 15:255–262.
Leedy JE, Janis JE, Rohrich RJ. Reconstruction ofacquired scalp defects: an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116:54e–72e.
Longacre JJ, DeStefano GA. Reconstruction of extensive defects of the skull with split rib grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1957; 19:186–200.
Viterbo F, Palhares A, Modenese E. Cranioplasty: the autograft option. J Craniofac Surg 1995; 6:80–83.
Antonyshyn O, Colcleugh RG, Anderson C. Growth potential in onlay bone grafts: a comparison of vascularized and free calvarial bone and suture bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79:12–23.
Ducic Y. Titanium mesh and hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty: a report of 20 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60:272–276.
Weber RS, Kearns DB, Smith RJ. Split calvarium cranioplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113:84–89.
Grant GA, Jolley M, Ellenbogen RG, et al. Failure of autologous boneassisted cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg 2004; 100:163–168.
Netscher DT, Stal S, Shenaq S. Management of residual cranial vault deformities. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19:301–313.
Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72:778–785.
Ozaki W, Buchman SR. Volume maintenance of onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton: micro-architecture versus embryologic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102:291–299.
Chen NT, Glowacki J, Bucky L, et al. The roles of revascularization and resorption on endurance of craniofacial onlay bone grafts in the rabbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93:714–722.
Park HK, Dujovny M, Agner C, et al. Biomechanical properties of calvarium prosthesis. Neurol Res 2001; 23:267–276.
Kiyokawa K, Hayakawa K, Tanabe H, et al. Cranioplasty with split lateral skull plate segments for reconstruction of skull defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998; 26:379–385.
Tessier P. Autogenous bone grafts taken from the calvarium for facial and cranial applications. Clin Plast Surg 1982; 9:531–538.
Kubler N, Michel C, Zoller J, et al. Repair of human skull defects using osteoinductive bone alloimplants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1995; 23:337–346.
Chen TM, Wang HJ. Cranioplasty using allogeneic perforated demineralized bone matrix with autogenous bone paste. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49:272–277.
Elsalanty ME, Por YC, Wang Q, et al. Reconstruction of Cranial Defects: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis ofthe Effect of Supporting and Bone-enhancing Materials on New Bone Formation. Dana Point, CA: Plastic Surgery Research Council; 2006.
Chim H, Schantz FT. New frontiers in calvarial reconstruction: integrating computer-assisted design and tissue engineering in cranioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116:1726–1741.
Spetzger U, Vougioukas V, Schipper J. Materials and techniques for osseous skull reconstruction. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2010; 19:110–121.
Maier W. Biomaterials in skull base surgery. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 8:Doc07.
Cho YR, Gosain AK. Biomaterials in craniofacial reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2004; 31:377–385.
Neovius E, Engstrand T. Craniofacial reconstruction with bone and biomaterials: review over the last 11 years. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 2010; 63:1615–1623.
Neumann A, Kevenhoerster K. Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 8:Doc08.
Toth BA, Ellis DS, Stewart WB. Computer-designed prostheses for orbitocranial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81:315–324.
Eufinger H, Wehmoller M. Individual prefabricated titanium implants in reconstructive craniofacial surgery: clinical and technical aspects of the first 22 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102:300–308.
Durham SR, McComb JG, Levy ML. Correction of large (>25cm(2)) cranial defects with “reinforced” hydroxyapatite cement: technique and complications. Neurosurgery 2003; 52:842–845.
Mirabile JC, Pawl RP, Hart CR. Delayed infection following tantalum cranioplasty: case report. Mil Med 1974; 139:398–399.
Taggard DA, Menezes AH. Successful use of rib grafts for cranioplasty in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 2001; 34:149–155.
Blum KS, Schneider SJ, Rosenthal AD. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty in children: long-term results. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997; 26:33–35.
Chandler CL, Uttley D, Archer DJ, et al. Imaging after titanium cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg 1994; 8:409–414.
Al-Tamimi YZ, Sinha P, Trivedi M, et al. Comparison of acrylic and titanium cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg 2012; 26:510–513.
Hill CS, Luoma AM, Wilson SR, et al. Titanium cranioplasty and the prediction of complications. Br J Neurosurg 2012; 26:832–837.
Wiltfang J, Kessler P, Buchfelder M, et al. Reconstruction of skull bone defects using the hydroxyapatite cement with calvarial split transplants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62:29–35.
Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO, Milam SB. Reconstruction of bone using calcium phosphate bone cements: a critical review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57:1122–1126.
Moreira-Gonzalez AA, Parikh A, Siemionow M, et al. Biomechanical Analysis of Long-term Reconstruction of Full Thickness Skull Defects Using Hydroxyapatite Cement (Norian CRS and Fast Set Putty) in a Sheep Model. Dana Point, CA: Plastic Surgery Research Council; 2006.
Burstein FD, Cohen SR, Hudgins R, et al. The use of hydroxyapatite cement in secondary craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104:1270–1275.
Gomez E, Martin M, Arias J, et al. Clinical applications of Norian SRS (calcium phosphate cement) in craniofacial reconstruction in children: our experience at Hospital La Paz since 2001. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63:8–14.
Matic D, Phillips JH. A contraindication for the use of hydroxyapatite cement in the pediatric population. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110:1–5.
Wong RK, Gandolfi BM, St-Hilaire H, et al. Complications of hydroxyapatite bone cement in secondary pediatric craniofacial reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22:247–251.
Wong RKGB, St-Hilaire H, et al. Complications of hydroxyapatite bone cement in secondary pediatric craniofacial reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22:247–251.
Stefini R, Esposito G, Iaccarino C, et al. Use of ‘custom made’ porous hydroxyapatite implants for cranioplasty: postoperative analysis of complications in 1549 patients. Surg Neurol Int 2013; 4:12.
Gilardino MS, Cabiling DS, Bartlett SP. Long-term follow-up experience with carbonated calcium phosphate cement (Norian) for cranioplasty in children and adults. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123:983–994.
Andrzejak S, Fortuniak J, Wrobel-Wisniewska G, et al. Clinical evaluation of the polypropylene-polyester knit used as a cranioplasty material. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005; 147:973–976.
Rubin JP, Yaremchuk MJ. Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100:1336–1353.
Alibhai MK, Balasundaram I, Bridle C, et al. Is there a therapeutic role for cranioplasty? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42:559–561.
Liu JK, Gottfried ON, Cole CD, et al. Porous polyethylene implant for cranioplasty and skull base reconstruction. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 16:EC1.
Tark WH, Yoon IS, Rah DK, et al. Osteoconductivity of porous polyethylene in human skull. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23:78–80.
Lethaus B, Safi Y, ter Laak-Poort M, et al. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29:1077–1083.
Wang JC, Wei L, Xu J, et al. Clinical outcome of cranioplasty with high-density porous polyethylene. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23:1404–1406.
Hatamleh MM, Cartmill M, Watson J. Management of extensive frontal cranioplasty defects. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24:2018–2022.
Bartlett P, Carter LM, Russell JL. The Leeds method for titanium cranioplasty construction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 47:238–240.
Hatamleh M, Watson J. 3D innovations of cranioplasty plate construction: a case report. Smile Dent J 2011; 6:22–24.
Day RE, Guy DT, Kop AM, et al. The Royal Perth Hospital method for the design and manufacture of titanium cranioplasty plates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 50:376–377.
Sharma SD, Lim B, Bentley RP. Preservation of the temporalis muscle during cranioplasty. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 50:e36–e37.
Wiggins A, Austerberry R, Morrison D, et al. Cranioplasty with custommade titanium plates–14 years experience. Neurosurgery 2013; 72:248–256.
Puippe JC. Surface treatment oftitanium implants European cells and materials 2003; 5:32–33.
Hatamleh MM. Preparation and In vitro analysis of craniofacial titanium implants surfaces produced by additive 3D printing and conventional manufacturing. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2020; https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520970792
doi: 10.1177/1943387520970792
Hatamleh MM, Wu X, Alnazzawi A, et al. Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of cranioplasty titanium implants following different surface treatments. Dent Mater 2018; 34:676–683.
D’Urso PS, Earwaker WJ, Barker T, et al. Custom cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53:200–204.
Rotaru H, Stan H, Florian IS, et al. Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70:e169–e176.