The best of both worlds: Combining lineage-specific and universal bait sets in target-enrichment hybridization reactions.
Brassicaceae
Hyb‐Seq
combining probes
enrichment
phylogenomics
phylogeny
population biology
target enrichment
Journal
Applications in plant sciences
ISSN: 2168-0450
Titre abrégé: Appl Plant Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101590473
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
15
11
2020
accepted:
16
03
2021
entrez:
2
8
2021
pubmed:
3
8
2021
medline:
3
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Researchers adopting target-enrichment approaches often struggle with the decision of whether to use universal or lineage-specific probe sets. To circumvent this quandary, we investigate the efficacy of a simultaneous enrichment by combining universal probes and lineage-specific probes in a single hybridization reaction, to benefit from the qualities of both probe sets with little added cost or effort. Using 26 Brassicaceae libraries and standard enrichment protocols, we compare results from three independent data sets. A large average fraction of reads mapping to the Angiosperms353 (24-31%) and Brassicaceae (35-59%) targets resulted in a sizable reconstruction of loci for each target set (x̄ ≥ 70%). High levels of enrichment and locus reconstruction for the two target sets demonstrate that the sampling of genomic regions can be easily extended through the combination of probe sets in single enrichment reactions. We hope that these findings will facilitate the production of expanded data sets that answer individual research questions and simultaneously allow wider applications by the research community as a whole.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34336398
doi: 10.1002/aps3.11438
pii: APS311438
pmc: PMC8312739
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Hendriks et al. Applications in Plant Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Botanical Society of America.
Références
Appl Plant Sci. 2014 Aug 29;2(9):
pubmed: 25225629
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 1;26(5):589-95
pubmed: 20080505
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Syst Biol. 2021 May 13;:
pubmed: 33983440
Appl Plant Sci. 2015 Aug 14;3(8):
pubmed: 26312196
Syst Biol. 2019 Jul 1;68(4):594-606
pubmed: 30535394
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jan 09;9:1941
pubmed: 30687347
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017 Dec;117:111-123
pubmed: 28535985
Am J Bot. 2017 Jan;104(1):102-115
pubmed: 28104589
Gigascience. 2019 Apr 1;8(4):
pubmed: 30715311
Appl Plant Sci. 2020 Apr 14;8(4):e11337
pubmed: 32351798
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 1;25(11):1422-3
pubmed: 19304878
New Phytol. 2019 May;222(3):1638-1651
pubmed: 30735246
New Phytol. 2020 Feb;225(3):1355-1369
pubmed: 31665814
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 09;10:1655
pubmed: 31998342
Appl Plant Sci. 2019 Jun 13;7(6):e11254
pubmed: 31236313
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Oct;24(10):887-891
pubmed: 31477409
J Comput Biol. 2012 May;19(5):455-77
pubmed: 22506599
Appl Plant Sci. 2018 Apr 02;6(3):e1036
pubmed: 29732266
Appl Plant Sci. 2014 Feb 06;2(2):
pubmed: 25202605
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943