Comparison of the Incidence of Capsular Formation in Two-Stage, Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using an Insertion Funnel and Sizer.
Journal
BioMed research international
ISSN: 2314-6141
Titre abrégé: Biomed Res Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101600173
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
06
05
2021
accepted:
30
06
2021
entrez:
2
8
2021
pubmed:
3
8
2021
medline:
22
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Capsular formation around breast implants can produce various complications, including erythema, tenderness, discomfort, and breast deformation. Moreover, the capsule is thought to be correlated with breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The proposed technique of capsule reduction can prevent some of these complications. Thus, the authors suggest a no-touch technique in two-stage, implant-based breast reconstruction. This study included 33 breasts (31 patients): 18 in group A and 15 in group B. The capsular thicknesses of the ADM, the chest wall, and the muscle of group A were significantly thinner than those in group B. Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated negative correlations between capsular thickness and age; underlying disease; lesion side; interval of two-stage implant insertion; size of the expander; and radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or hormone therapy. To reduce the incidence of capsular formation following breast reconstruction using prostheses, a no-touch technique that uses a funnel and sizer to avoid implant contact is both efficient and beneficial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34337008
doi: 10.1155/2021/3898585
pmc: PMC8286178
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3898585Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Jun Hyeok Kim et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Apr;145(4):901-911
pubmed: 32221199
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000 Feb;26(1):17-9
pubmed: 10718173
Cancer. 2012 Mar 15;118(6):1701-9
pubmed: 22025176
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Oct;66(10):1382-9
pubmed: 23764323
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Oct;96(5):1125-9
pubmed: 7568489
Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Jul;33(5):675-80
pubmed: 23757043
Biomaterials. 2003 Mar;24(6):1101-9
pubmed: 12504533
Acta Med Port. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(6):737-45
pubmed: 24388262
Int Wound J. 2017 Apr;14(2):414-419
pubmed: 27524677
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:254940
pubmed: 23956974
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar;143(3S A Review of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell L):51S-58S
pubmed: 30817556
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Feb;78(2):153-156
pubmed: 27464530
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 26;2018:3167037
pubmed: 29854742
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Apr;131(4):680-685
pubmed: 23542241
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun;127(6):2141-2150
pubmed: 21358562
Clin Plast Surg. 2015 Oct;42(4):605-13
pubmed: 26408447
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):82-91
pubmed: 19568048
Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Nov;32(8):956-63
pubmed: 22964141
Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Sep;42(5):532-43
pubmed: 26430623
J Immunol Res. 2018 Sep 20;2018:6784971
pubmed: 30327786
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6486859
pubmed: 29098159
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;39(3):306-15
pubmed: 25743110
Ann Surg. 1993 Jul;218(1):29-36
pubmed: 8328826
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020 Jun;46:151512
pubmed: 32315816
Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;116(24):5584-91
pubmed: 21136577